Year of publishing
2025
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the trends and indications for anterolateral complex augmentation during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) among international orthopaedic sports surgeons.
Methods: An electronically distributed survey was sent out to international surgeons with high-volume experience in complex ligament reconstructions and revision surgery attending the 2024 Freddie Fu Panther Sports Medicine Symposium. The survey was sent prior to the meeting with questions related to the use of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) or anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALL-R) during ACL-R. Sessions pertaining to anterolateral complex augmentation were held during the symposium to inform about current clinical practices among attendees.
Results: A total of 49 surgeons were identified from 5 different geographic regions prior to the meeting date and sent an electronic survey, of which 48 responded (98% response rate). Among surgeons who reported performing anterolateral complex augmentation procedures (n=45), a total of 39 (87%) respondents reported using only the LET technique, 2 (4%) using only the ALL-R technique, and 4 (9%) using both techniques during ACL-R. The most common indication for anterolateral complex augmentation was a high-grade pivot shift, which 39/43 (91%) of respondents ranked in their top 3 indications. In the setting of primary ACL-R, respondents added a LET when using hamstring tendon autograft in 38% of cases on average compared with 34% of cases when using either bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft or quadriceps tendon autograft. In the setting of revision ACL-R, a LET was added in an average of 68% of cases for a first-time revision ACL-R and 84% of cases for a multiple revision ACL-R.
Conclusion: The most common indication for ACL-R with anterolateral complex augmentation was a high-grade pivot shift and most respondents preferred LET over ALL-R. Respondents performed LET in a comparable percentage of cases of primary ACL-R using hamstring tendon, bone-patellar tendon-bone and quadriceps tendon autografts and this number increased with the number of revision ACL-Rs. Based on the results of this survey, surgeons may consider adding a LET in cases of revision ACL-R or in patients with a high-grade pivot shift.
Level of evidence: Level V.
Keywords: ACL; anterolateral ligament reconstruction; lateral extra-articular tenodesis; revision surgery; rotatory instability.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2025
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the most common orthopaedic sports medicine surgeries. Its prevalence in the sports medicine sphere is matched by the numerous options of different techniques. Chief among these is graft selection, which most commonly falls into 1 of 4 options: bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, hamstring tendon autograft (HT), quadriceps tendon autograft, and allografts. The most frequently used allografts include BPTB, HT, tibialis anterior or posterior tendon, and Achilles tendon. Each graft option possesses unique advantages and disadvantages. BPTB autograft demonstrates the fastest incorporation via bone-to-bone healing. It also yields a lower revision rate and greater return-to-sport rate compared with HT. However, because of donor-site morbidity, anterior knee pain and kneeling pain can occur. There is also a small risk of patellar fracture as well as patellar tendon rupture. HT autograft requires a smaller incision than BPTB and preserves the extensor mechanism. Patients are at risk for knee flexion weakness, saphenous nerve injury, and potential graft loosening over time secondary to bone tunnel widening. Quadriceps tendon autograft may be harvested with minimally invasive techniques. As with HT, the all soft-tissue composition allows use in skeletally immature patients. Although early studies show promise, knee extension weakness has been documented, and long-term outcomes are less clear. Allograft possesses no donor-site morbidity and reduced surgical time; however, allografts are associated with the greatest failure rate in young athletes and a lower return-to-sport rate compared with autografts. They also incur a greater financial cost than autografts. To be proficient at performing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, it is important that the sports medicine surgeon be well versed in the various graft options and the ideal patient populations for whom they are best used.
Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2025
Abstract
Backgroud: Allografts are preferred in certain cases of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions to avoid additional graft harvesting and to fill in enlarged tunnels. The clinical outcomes of quadriceps tendon-patellar bone allograft in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are not well-known. This study was performed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using quadriceps tendon-patellar bone allografts.
Methods: Patients who underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone allografts with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Their mean follow-up length was 33.5 ± 19.5 months. Outcomes including clinical scores (Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Tegner scale, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]), knee stability (physical examinations and knee arthrometer), return to sports, and any associated complications were assessed. Degrees of graft synovialization were also evaluated using arthroscopy.
Results: A total of 38 patients were reviewed and their age at the time of surgery and follow-up length were 37.2 ± 12.5 years (range, 17-66 years) and 2.8 ± 1.6 years, respectively. All clinical scores including KOOS, IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scale significantly improved at 2 years after surgery and 92.1% of the patients returned to sports. The mean preoperative side-to-side difference in knee arthrometer decreased from 4.5 ± 2.3 mm before surgery to 2.6 ± 1.5 mm after surgery (p < 0.001). Graft synovialization was observed in 13 of 16 patients (81.3%) who underwent second-look arthroscopy. Complication rate was 10.5% (n = 4). All complications were graft re-rupture and occurred at an average of 18 months after revision surgery.
Conclusions: Quadriceps tendon-patellar bone allograft showed satisfactory clinical outcomes in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and thus could be a good alternative when autograft harvesting is not optimal.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Quadriceps muscle.
Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association.
Year of publishing
2025
Abstract
Background: Arthrofibrosis is a complication of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and it is possible that graft choice such as the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft may be a risk factor. With the increasing popularity of the QT autograft, it is important to compare it with other graft choices.
Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to identify whether graft choice, QT versus bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft, is a risk factor for early return to the operating room for arthrofibrosis after ACLR. It was hypothesized that the rate of arthrofibrosis surgery would be higher for the QT autograft recipients.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted between January 2010 and November 2022. Skeletally mature patients who underwent primary ACLR with either QT or BTB autograft were considered for inclusion. Patients who received an alternate graft or those undergoing revision ACLR were excluded. The primary outcome of interest was return to the operating room for arthrofibrosis release (either manipulation under anesthesia or lysis of adhesions).
Results: Of 1726 included patients (1155 receiving a BTB autograft and 571 receiving a QT autograft), 5.2% (n = 60) of BTB recipients and 6.5% (n = 37) of QT recipients required subsequent arthrofibrosis. There was no significant association between graft type and subsequent arthrofibrosis (P = .275). There was a significant association with graft type and presence of a cyclops lesion (65.0% of BTB grafts and 40.5% of QT grafts; P = .018). After removing those patients with chronic tears who underwent ACLR at >1 year, patients who required arthrofibrosis were found to have a significantly shorter time between injury and ACLR (mean, 59.23 ± 48.46 days) than those who did not require arthrofibrosis (mean, 81.7 ± 72.63 days) (P≤ .01). Significantly more female patients (9.25%) than male patients (2.79%) required arthrofibrosis (hazard ratio, 3.82; P < .001), and patients who required arthrosis were significantly younger (mean, 22.52 ± 9.35 years) than those who did not (mean, 25.74 ± 10.83 years) (P = .001).
Conclusion: Study findings indicated no statistically significant difference in the rate of secondary arthrofibrosis surgery between patients who underwent ACLR with either QT or BTB autograft.
Keywords: ACL; biomechanics of ligament; general sports trauma; knee ligaments.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Year of publishing
2025
Abstract
Background: The use of quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been increasing since 2014. Studies have shown that QT is comparable to hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts in terms of outcomes, although QT autograft has lower rates of donor site morbidity. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been previously conducted on this topic, although none have focused solely on data of patients at least 5 years out from surgery.
Hypothesis/purpose: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to demonstrate that QT may not be superior to BTB and HT autografts and that long-term studies must be performed before recommending QT over other graft choices. It was hypothesized that there would be less available data at ≥5 years of follow-up for patients with QT than those with HT and BTB autografts, and that patient-reported outcomes would be similar between all 3 graft choices.
Study design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: The PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus (Elsevier), Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for studies that reported on QT, BTB, or HT outcomes at ≥5 years after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). In total, 27 studies were included; patient and outcome data were collected from each. Summary odds ratios were calculated for each outcome and compared between all graft types.
Results: The sheer volume of available patient data on QT autografts at ≥5 years after ACLR is vastly different from what is available on HT and BTB autografts (which have almost 3 times the amount of patient data as compared with QT). HT had the highest failure rate (12.7%), followed by QT (9.1%) and BTB (6.4%); summary odds ratios favored BTB over both QT and HT in terms of failure rate. Patient-reported outcomes were comparable between graft types, although some comparisons were not adequately powered.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis reveals critical information on the current state of the literature surrounding QT use in ACLR. Most notably, additional mid-term and long-term patient data are needed on those undergoing ACLR with QT autograft. There is not enough long-term outcome data on QT to recommend it over HT or BTB for primary ACLR.
Keywords: ACL; ACL reconstruction; meta-analysis; patient-reported outcomes; quadriceps tendon autograft.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
We report a case of a 12-years-old boy that underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and lateral meniscus repair. The all-epiphyseal, all-inside technique, with quadriceps tendon autograft and adjustable suspensory button fixation was utilized due to the open physes. Intraoperative fluoroscopy confirmed optimal position of the buttons, while arthroscopic evaluation of the graft showed proper tension, with full range of motion and knee stability. Nevertheless, routine radiographic evaluation of the knee, 6 h postoperatively, revealed tibial button migration through the tunnel into the knee joint, while the knee was unstable in clinical examination. The graft was removed and reloaded with extended buttons. The femoral socket was retained in the revision surgery while a new tibial socket was drilled with the transphyseal technique (all-inside technique). The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient returned to unrestricted activities at twelve months after revision surgery and remains fully active two years postoperatively. This is the first case of tibial button migration reported in the literature, with immediate migration after surgery, intra-articular position of the button and negative impact on graft tension. Failure to recognize and treat this detrimental complication could be catastrophic for the knee. The technique of the surgical treatment is also described. Surgeons should be aware of this rare complication, that could adversely affect the clinical outcome.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Case reports; Complications; Revision joint; Surgical fixation devices.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: There are currently no studies investigating the in vivo stiffness of the most commonly used autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using Shear wave elastography (SWE). We hypothesize that there are differences regarding the elastic properties between the three tendons commonly used for ACLR and that they are influenced by patient-related factors.
Materials and methods: 80 healthy subjects (25 females, 55 males, age: 25.33 ± 4.76 years, BMI: 23.76 ± 3.14 kg/m2, 40 semiprofessional athletes, athlete group [AG], age: 25.51 [19-29]; 40 healthy controls, control group [CG], age: 25.50 [20-29]) were recruited as participants. In addition to patient reported outcome scores, every participant underwent a standardized multimodal ultrasound protocol consisting of B-mode-ultrasound (B-US), Color Doppler-ultrasound (CD-US) and a SWE examination of the bilateral quadriceps tendon (QT), patellar tendon (PT) and semitendinosus tendon (ST).
Results: The highest shear wave velocity (SWV) were observed in ST (4.88 (4.35-5.52) m/s, ST vs QT, p = 0.005; ST vs PT, p < 0.001) followed by QT (4.61 (4.13-5.26) m/s, QT vs PT, p < 0.001) and PT (3.73 (3.30-4.68) m/s). Median QT, PT and ST stiffness was significantly higher in AG compared to CG. Male subjects tend to have stiffer QT and PT than female subjects. Positive correlation with SWV was obtained for age and activity level.
Conclusion: There are significant differences regarding in vivo tendon stiffness between the most frequently used autograft tendon options for ACLR. The quantitative information obtained by SWE could be of particular interest for graft choice for ACLR.
Keywords: Musculoskeletal ultrasound; Shear wave elastography; Tendon stiffness.
Copyright © 2024 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common orthopedic procedure, employing various grafts such as the hamstring tendon, bone-patellar bone, and quadriceps tendon. Fixation methods include suspensory loop with button, interferential screw, and cortical fixation. The optimal screw diameter for tibial tunnel fixation remains undefined, with choices ranging from 1mm smaller to 1-2 mm larger than the tunnel diameter. Screw-related complications such as breakage and thread flattening are concerns. This study was to determine the ideal screw diameter for secure graft fixation in the tibial tunnel during ACL reconstruction.
Materials and methods: A novel arthroscopic probe technique was utilized to assess tibial tunnel bone integrity. Bone quality was categorized into weak, strong, and very strong. Screw size selection, either equal to or 1-2 mm larger than the tunnel diameter, was based on bone quality. Screw lengths varied from 25 mm to 35 mm.
Results: The novel technique significantly reduced screw-related complications, from 9.6% (24 out of 248 patients) to 0.5% (l out of 187 patients). The need for additional cortical stabilization decreased from 14.5% (36 out of248 patients) to 1.6% (3 out of 187 patients).
Conclusion: The low-cost, efficient 2-min probe test is a secure and effective method for selecting interferential screws in ACL reconstruction, minimizing complications, and additional stabilization needs.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; biodegradable screw; graft fixation; tibial tunnel.
Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group.
Year of publishing
2024
Introduction
Studies are lacking that evaluate early postoperative pain after all-soft-tissue quadriceps tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), particularly in young patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in early postoperative pain between adolescent patients undergoing ACLR with quadriceps tendon versus hamstring autograft. A retrospective review was performed of 60 patients (mean age, 15.6 ± 1.3 years) who underwent ACLR using either quadriceps tendon ( n = 31) or hamstring ( n = 29) autografts between January 2017 and February 2020. Intraoperative and postoperative milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs), postanesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay and PACU pain scores were recorded. Pain scores and supplemental oxycodone use were recorded on postoperative days (POD) 1-3. Differences were compared between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, body mass index or concomitant meniscus repairs between the two groups ( P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in intraoperative MMEs, PACU MMEs or PACU length of stay between groups ( P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in maximum PACU pain scores (3.7 ± 3.0 vs. 3.8 ± 3.2; P = 0.89). Maximum pain scores on POD 1-3 were similar between groups ( P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in supplemental oxycodone doses between groups on POD 1-3 ( P > 0.05). Adolescent patients undergoing ACLR with quadriceps tendon and hamstring autografts have similar pain levels and opioid use in the early postoperative period.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2025
Abstract
While proven effective management of multiligament knee injury (MLKI) using allograft is often reported, it has shown an increased risk for graft failure compared with autograft and raises availability and cost issues. Osseous stock preservation and tunnel convergence avoidance led us to develop a compromise innovative surgical procedure using only ipsilateral autograft for anatomic reconstruction of Schenck III-L or higher MLKI. We report the description and early outcomes of our initial experience. Our strategy consisted of an anatomic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft and a "Versailles" reconstruction for the posterolateral corner, which we modified to reconstruct the anterolateral ligament in case of anteromedial rotatory instability, called "full lateral." A second-stage surgery was planned for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. Outcomes were Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores for functional status, Short Form 12 (SF-12) for quality of life, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Complications, full weight-bearing, return to work, and sport were also computed. Between March 2019 and August 2020, 10 patients were included. At follow-up, light pain was found in nine patients with a mean VAS of 1.2 ± 2.16 during the day. The mean Lysholm, Tegner, and subjective IKDC scores were good, with 61.2 ± 20.6, 2.8 ± 2.1, and 52.6 ± 20.4, respectively. However, quality of life was altered with poor SF-12 scores. In our first 10 patients with Schenck III-L or higher MLKI, our procedure using only ipsilateral autograft enabled correct daily knee functional activities while preserving osseous stock.
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2025
Abstract
Purpose: To identify trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), including graft choice, femoral tunnel drilling techniques, and augmentation techniques, and to assess how various surgeon factors impact these trends.
Methods: A retrospective review of primary ACLRs performed between 2014 and 2022 was completed using a multicenter institutional database. Patient demographic characteristics, graft type, femoral drilling technique, use of extra-articular tenodesis, and use of suture augmentation were recorded from the medical record. Surgeon fellowship training (sports trained vs non-sports trained), experience (high [minimum of 15 years in practice] vs low), and volume (high [minimum of 15 ACLRs/year] vs low) were used to stratify technique utilization. The z test for proportions was used to compare categorical variables. Pearson correlation analyses identified trends and assessed statistical significance, defined as P < .05.
Results: Our cohort consisted of 2,032 ACLRs performed in 2,006 patients. The average patient age was 28.3 ± 11.6 years, with more procedures performed in male patients (67.3%). The average length of surgeon experience was 19.7 ± 11.4 years, with an average annual procedural volume of 4.0 ± 5.4 ACLRs. Most surgeons were sports trained (n = 55, 64.7%), high experience (n = 44, 57.1%), and low volume (n = 80, 94.1%). There was an increasing annual proportion of ACLRs performed by sports-trained surgeons (R = 0.748, P = .020) and low-experience surgeons (R = 0.940, P < .001). Autograft reconstructions were most often performed by sports-trained (71.2%), low-experience (66.1%), and high-volume (76.9%) surgeons. There was an increasing proportion of autograft ACLRs that used quadriceps tendon among sports-trained (R = 0.739, P = .023), high-experience (R = 0.768, P = .016), and low-volume (R = 0.785, P = .012) surgeons. Independent drilling techniques were used in an increasing proportion of ACLRs performed by non-sports-trained (R = 0.860, P = .003) and high-volume (R = 0.864, P = .003) surgeons. Augmentation of ACLR with concomitant suture augmentation (n = 24, 1.2%) or extra-articular tenodesis (n = 6, 0.3%) was rarely performed.
Conclusions: In our multicenter institution, the quadriceps tendon autograft has been increasingly used in ACLR by sports-trained, low-volume, and high-experience surgeons. Independent drilling techniques have been increasingly used by non-sports-trained and high-volume surgeons.
Clinical relevance: Surgeons must stay current with the literature that affects their procedures to ensure that evidence-based medicine is being practiced.
Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2025
Abstract
Introduction: Aberrant knee mechanics during gait 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are associated with markers of knee cartilage degeneration. The purpose of this study was to compare loading during walking gait in quadriceps tendon, bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon autograft patients 6 months post-ACLR using loadsol single sensor insoles, and to evaluate associations between loading and patient-reported outcomes.
Methods: Seventy-two patients (13 to 40 yr) who underwent unilateral, primary ACLR with BPTB, quadriceps tendon, or hamstring tendon autograft completed treadmill gait assessment, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) survey, and the ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) survey 6 ± 1 months post-ACLR. Ground reaction forces were collected using loadsols. Limb symmetry indices (LSI) for peak impact force (PIF), loading response instantaneous loading rate (ILR), and loading response average loading rate (ALR) were compared between groups using separate analyses of covariance. Survey scores were compared between groups using one-way ANOVAs. The relationships between IKDC, ACL-RSI, and LSI were compared using Pearson's product moment correlation coefficients.
Results: There were no significant differences between graft sources for LSI in PIF, ILR, ALR, or impulse. Patient-reported knee function was significantly different between graft source groups with the BPTB group reporting the highest IKDC scores; however, there was no significant difference between groups for ACL-RSI score. There were no significant associations between IKDC score, ACL-RSI score, and biomechanical symmetry among any of the graft source groups.
Conclusions: Autograft type does not influence PIF, ILR, ALR, or impulse during walking 6 months post-ACLR. Limb symmetry during gait is not strongly associated with patient-reported outcomes regardless of graft source. Loadsols appear to be a suitable tool for use in the clinical rehabilitation setting.
Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Sports Medicine.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Given the increasing incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in skeletally immature patients, improving surgical outcome for ACL reconstruction has been at the forefront of orthopaedic pediatric and adolescent sports medicine research. This research has focused upon graft choice, modifiable risk factors, and nonmodifiable risk factors. Allograft is contraindicated in these patients, and bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts should be avoided (as bone plugs should be avoided near the open physis). Because of the greater failure rates of hamstring tendon autograft in this cohort, especially in the older cohort of skeletally immature athletes treated with a complete transphyseal ACL reconstruction, our preferred graft choice is quadriceps tendon autograft. Rehabilitation is a modifiable risk factor, and we emphasize a need for return to sport assessment before release for sports. Nonmodifiable risk factors in this skeletally immature cohort include recurvatum, increased anterior translation (>7 mm), high-grade pivot shift, increased lateral posterior tibial slope, high velocity marrow edema patterns involving the lateral femoral condyle and lateral tibial plateau, Beighton score >4, and the eighth- and ninth-grade athletes. When these findings are present in an athlete who plans to return to pivoting and contact/collision sports, we indicate a lateral extra-articular tenodesis in the form of a modified Lemaire procedure.
Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
The gold standard for surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries is reconstruction. There are a variety of graft options, from autograft to allograft, using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB), hamstrings, quadriceps, or Achilles, and, in the case of a multiligamentous knee injury (MLKI), allograft may be preferred to decrease operative time and graft harvest morbidity. The BioBrace (ConMed, New Haven, CT) is a bioinductive collagen scaffold designed to provide an environment for soft tissue remodeling with time zero biomechanical support and can be used to augment graft reconstructions in the case of concerns for allograft strength, healing, or width. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe the technique for performing an ACL reconstruction with BioBrace-augmented allograft in the setting of a MLKI, with special consideration for 2 methods of graft preparation (BTB and soft tissue).
© 2023 The Authors.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: Despite a growing body of literature regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), there remains a wide diversity in surgical technique and clinical practice across providers.
Purpose: To (1) describe current ACLR practice preferences among members of the Herodicus society and (2) determine whether these preferences are influenced by years in practice and overall surgical volume.
Study design: Cross-sectional study.
Methods: A 24-question survey investigating surgeons' practices and preferred ACLR surgical techniques was sent via email to all active Herodicus Society members. Survey responses were subdivided by years of experience and overall ACLR annual case volume. Descriptive statistics were compiled and chi-square testing was utilized to determine the significance of experience and case volume on survey responses.
Results: Of the 113 invited Herodicus Society members who perform ACLR, 69 (61%) completed the survey. Respondents had a mean ± SD of 30.9 ± 9.8 years of experience in clinical practice and performed a mean of 96.0 ± 50.7 primary and 21.6 ± 16.9 revision ACLR annually. Of revision cases, 72.1% were performed using a single-stage technique. Mean frequency of graft usage by surgeon was bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (58.6%), quadriceps autograft (14.6%), hamstring tendon autograft (14.0%), and allograft (11.8%). The plurality of surgeons responded that they used anterolateral augmentation "rarely" in primary ACLR (39.1%) and "sometimes" in revision ACLR (31.9%), with the majority performing lateral extra-articular tenodesis (66.7%) rather than anterolateral ligament reconstruction (14.5%). Most surgeons would not allow a 20-year-old football player to return before 7 months after ACLR (71.0%) but highly valued return-to-sports testing to determine readiness (94.2%). Higher volume surgeons performed single-stage revision ACLR at a significantly higher rate (79.8% vs 62.9%, P = .02) and significantly differed in return-to-sports criteria, with a greater proportion relying primarily on biometric testing (P = .01).
Conclusion: The survey demonstrated that, in the Herodicus Society, a wide range of preferences exist regarding ACLR surgical technique. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft is the most frequent primary ACLR graft choice. Most participants have not embraced newer techniques such as anterolateral or suture tape augmentation. Return to sports is generally not allowed before 7 months and heavily factors-in return-to-sports testing metrics, suggesting that purely time-based criteria for return to sports is not modern practice among elite sports medicine surgeons.
Keywords: ACL; ACLR; Herodicus Society; graft choice; knee ligaments.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: The extensor apparatus of the knee is of paramount importance in generating the torque needed for a countermovement jump (CMJ), especially in jumping athletes. In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) procedures, graft harvesting from the extensor apparatus may dramatically affect extensor strength and jumping performance.
Hypothesis: The focused jump training of professional jumping athletes would increase the likelihood of restoring jumping performance after ACLR, despite the graft choice (autologous bone-patellar tendon-bone [BPTB] or hamstring [HS] tendon).
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: A retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data was carried out. Only professional athletes were included, and all surgical procedures were performed by a single experienced surgeon. Data collection considered the type of surgery, sports activity, and functional evaluation at 3 months after surgery. From the functional evaluation, data on single-leg hop (SLH) test, triple hop (TH) test, and CMJ were extracted. Limb symmetry index (LSI) for maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the quadriceps and for each of the jumping tests was calculated. Multiple analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models were used to assess mean differences among groups for the LSI in CMJ, SLH, and TH and estimate the effect of confounders.
Results: From a subsequent series of 208 athletes, 44 professional athletes were included for data collection. Of these, 26 were male and 18 were female. A jumping sport (basketball, volleyball) was played by 17 athletes, while a running sport (soccer, judo, rugby, tennis, ski) was performed by 27 athletes. The mean time from injury to surgery was 17.8 ± 14.5 days. At 90 days from surgery, the overall mean LSI for CMJ was 85.3% ± 8.9%, for SLH was 92.2% ± 6.4%, and for TH was 90.8% ± 6.1%. When ANCOVA was fitted using the interaction term with BPTB autograft and jumping sport, a nonsignificant effect on LSI for CMJ (P = .56), SLH (P = .72), and TH (P = .98) was observed.
Conclusion: The results of the present investigation on professional athletes showed that no difference occurred within the study cohort in overall jumping performance between jumping and running athletes undergoing ACLR either with BPTB or with HS tendon grafts. Although some evidence suggests that quadriceps strength may be dramatically affected by the harvesting of BPTB, the overall performance of the jump was not compromised.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; graft choice; jumping performance; knee; professional athlete.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: Selecting an appropriate graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction requires consideration of a patient's preferences, goals, age, and physical demands alongside the risks and benefits of each graft choice.
Purpose: To determine the most popular ACL reconstruction grafts among patients and the most important factors influencing their decisions.
Study design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction between October 2022 and April 2023 completed a survey either before (nonconsult group) or after (consult group) speaking with their surgeon, who provided an evidence-based description of the pros and cons of an allograft and the following autografts: bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), hamstring tendon (HT), and quadriceps tendon (QT). Patient characteristics, graft choice, information influencing their graft choice, and surgeon recommendation were collected and compared between the groups.
Results: Among the 100 included patients, 59.0% were male, and the mean age was 28.3 ± 10.4 years. The most popular grafts were the BPTB (56.0%), followed by the QT (29.0%), HT (8.0%), and allograft (7.0%). No significant difference was observed in the graft selection between the consult group (n = 60; BPTB, 46.7%; QT, 38.3%; HT, 8.3%; allograft, 6.7%) and nonconsult group (n = 40; BPTB, 70.0%; QT, 15.0%; HT, 7.5%; allograft, 7.5%) (P = .0757). In the consult group, 81.7% of patients selected the graft recommended to them by their surgeon. The top 2 graft selection reasons were usage in professional athletes and failure rates, while the top 2 ACL surgery concerns were returning to their desired level of athletics and graft failure risk. Among the 93 patients who researched their ACL graft options before their visit, the most popular information source was some form of media (72.0% [67/93]).
Conclusion: The study findings underscore the importance of patient preference and surgeon recommendation in a patient's graft selection and highlight the need to be cognizant of the information sources available to patients when researching their graft options.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; allograft; autograft; graft.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Case: A 14-year-old adolescent girl and 18-year-old man underwent right anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts via partial-thickness harvest. While both patients initially recovered well, later they experienced a painful snapping in their knee localized to the lateral QT, just proximal to the patella. Surgical completion of the previous partial-thickness defect with imbrication provided resolution of symptoms at 4 and 9 months postoperatively, respectively.
Conclusion: We present a snapping QT as a rare complication of partial-thickness QT harvest for ACL reconstruction. Surgical completion of the partial-thickness defect with imbrication resolved the snapping sensation in these two cases.
Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
The idea of using quadriceps tendon autograft (QT) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction first came into being in the 1990s; it was, however, not widely recognized and has resurfaced only in recent times. Because sufficient technological supports have not been developed to enable an optimal artificial graft, autologous grafts are still the most dependable option. The major reason for choosing QT instead of hamstring or patellar tendon to get autologous grafts is that it seems to cause the fewest donor site problems. Two commonly applied ways of using the quadriceps are partial and full thickness; another option is superficial. Our technique for harvesting the superficial part of the QT, which starts proximal to the fused point of the 3 layers, is aimed at circumventing premature cutting of the graft.
© 2024 The Authors.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common procedure for injuries to this ligament, especially in athletes. There are different types of grafts used, and the choice depends on several factors. Autologous grafts, from the patients themselves, are the most common option, with rapid incorporation and a lower failure rate. Allografts from donors have their role in specific cases. Synthetic grafts, used in the 1980s, have advantages such as the absence of morbidity at the donor site, but studies have shown long-term complications. Hybrid grafts, combining autologous grafts and allografts, have gained interest, allowing a larger diameter and reducing morbidity. Peroneus longus tendon autograft has received attention, with positive results, good knee function and less hypotrophy of the thigh at the donor site. Autologous quadriceps tendon graft has gained popularity, with results comparable to patellar and flexor tendon grafts, lower morbidity at the donor site and a lower rate of re-rupture. The choice of graft has evolved, with autologous flexor grafts being preferred for less active patients and patellar grafts with bone fragments for high-performance athletes. Allografts, synthetic and hybrid grafts have their role in specific circumstances. The choice must be based on scientific evidence, considering advantages and disadvantages. ACL reconstruction is a complex procedure that requires individual considerations to select the most appropriate graft.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; grafting; knee.
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common in sports and often require surgical intervention, e.g., ACL reconstruction (ACLR), aimed at restoring knee stability and enabling a return to pre-injury activity levels. The choice of graft is crucial, impacting biomechanical properties, clinical outcomes, and complication rates, and is especially important in revision surgeries after graft failure. Over the past 30 years, trends in graft selection have evolved towards more individualized approaches, considering factors such as patient activity level, prior injuries, and tissue availability. In Europe, autografts like hamstring tendon (HT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB), and quadriceps tendon (QT) are preferred, with the increasing use of QT grafts. This review synthesizes the current literature on graft selection and its influence on ACLR outcomes.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament injury; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; bone patellar tendon autograft; graft selection; hamstrings autograft; individualized approach; quadriceps tendon autograft.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: The reported incidence of posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis (PTOA) after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) varies considerably. Further, there are gaps in identifying which patients are at risk for PTOA after ACLR and whether there are modifiable factors.
Purpose: To (1) determine the incidence of PTOA in a primary ACLR cohort and (2) identify patient and perioperative factors associated with the development of PTOA after primary ACLR.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Data from the Kaiser Permanente ACLR Registry were used to conduct a cohort study. Patients who had undergone primary ACLR without a previous diagnosis of osteoarthritis were identified (2009-2020). The crude incidence of PTOA was calculated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator with a multistate model. The association of patient and operative factors with the development of PTOA after primary ACLR was modeled as a time to event using multistate Cox proportional hazards regression. Models stratified by age (<22 and ≥22 years) were also conducted because of the effect modification of age.
Results: The study sample included 41,976 cases of primary ACLR. The incidence of PTOA was 1.7%, 5.1%, and 13.6% at 2, 5, and 10 year follow-ups, respectively. Risk factors for PTOA that were consistently identified in the overall cohort and age-stratified groups included a body mass index ≥30 versus <30 and an allograft or quadriceps tendon autograft versus a hamstring tendon autograft. Patients presenting with knee pain after ACLR were further identified when considering postoperative factors. Other risk factors for PTOA in the overall cohort included age ≥22 versus <22 years, bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring tendon autograft, hypertension, cartilage injury, meniscal injury, revision after primary ACLR with concomitant meniscal/cartilage surgery, multiligament injury, other activity at the time of injury compared with sport, and tibial tunnel drilling technique rather than the anteromedial portal.
Conclusion: Knee pain after ACLR may be an early sign of PTOA. Surgeons should consider the adverse associations of a higher body mass index and an allograft or quadriceps tendon autograft with the development of PTOA, as these were factors identified with a higher risk, regardless of a patient's age at the time of primary ACLR.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; knee pain; posttraumatic osteoarthritis; quadriceps tendon; registry.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the biomechanical effects of tape-reinforced graft suturing and graft retensioning for all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (ASTQT) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in a full-construct human cadaveric model.
Methods: Harvested cadaveric ASTQT grafts were assigned to either (1) double-suspensory adjustable-loop cortical button device (ALD) fixation in which both graft ends were fixed with a suspensory fixation device with (n = 5) or without (n = 5) tape-reinforced suturing or (2) single-suspensory distal tendon fixation in which only the patellar end was fixed with an ALD (n = 5) or fixed-loop cortical button device (FLD) (n = 5). All specimens were prepared using a No. 2 whipstitch technique, and tape-reinforced specimens had an integrated braided tape implant. Graft preparation time was recorded for double-suspensory constructs. Samples were tested on an electromechanical testing machine using a previously published protocol simulating rehabilitative kinematics and loading.
Results: Tape-reinforced graft suturing resulted in greater graft load retention after cycling (11.9% difference, P = .021), less total elongation (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)], 5.57 mm [3.50-7.65 mm] vs 32.14 mm [25.38-38.90 mm]; P < .001), greater ultimate failure stiffness (mean [95% CI], 171.9 N/mm [158.8-185.0 N/mm] vs 119.4 N/mm [108.7-130.0 N/mm]; P < .001), and less graft preparation time (36.4% difference, P < .001) when compared with unreinforced specimens. Retensioned ALD constructs had less cyclic elongation compared with FLD constructs (mean total elongation [95% CI], 7.04 mm [5.47-8.61 mm] vs 12.96 mm [8.67-17.26 mm]; P = .004).
Conclusions: Tape-reinforced graft suturing improves time-zero ASTQT ACLR construct biomechanics in a cadaveric model with 83% less total elongation, 44% greater stiffness, and reduced preparation time compared with a whipstitched graft without tape reinforcement. ALD fixation improves construct mechanics when compared with FLD fixation as evidenced by 46% less total elongation.
Clinical relevance: Tape-reinforced implants and graft retensioning using ALDs improve time-zero ACLR graft construct biomechanics in a time-zero biomechanical model. Clinical studies will be necessary to determine whether these implants improve clinical outcomes including knee laxity and the incidence of graft rupture.
Copyright © 2023 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: New techniques are being developed to decrease the failure rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts and prevent revision surgery. One such technique involves high-strength suture tape (ST), also referred to as internal bracing. Recent literature has highlighted the use of ST for ACL reconstruction, but no study has compared ST augmentation between graft types.
Purpose: To compare the use of ST augmentation for ACL reconstruction based on the type of graft used (ie, bone-patellar tendon-bone [BPTB], quadriceps, hamstring).
Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 5.
Methods: An online search of multiple databases was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and was completed April 2022 to identify studies related to ST augmentation of ACL grafts.
Results: Of 926 studies identified, 10 met inclusion criteria. Five studies (50%) used hamstring tendon (HT), 3 (30%) used quadriceps tendon (QT), 1 (10%) used BPTB, and 1 (10%) used both HT and QT grafts. HT autografts augmented with ST had decreased dynamic and peak elongation (15%-56%), increased load to failure, and increased initial and final dynamic stiffness compared with controls. There was no significant difference in postoperative physical examination findings (range of motion, Lachman, pivot shift), except that ST-augmented grafts had significantly less laxity after surgery compared with HT alone (0.8 vs 1.9 mm; P < .05). QT allografts with ST augmentation showed increased graft strength. Human QT autograft studies showed higher Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score scores compared with controls. BPTB allografts with ST augmentation had decreased cyclic displacement by 31% (P = .015) and increased load (758 ± 128 N; P < .001) and stiffness (156 ± 23 N/mm; P = .003) compared with nonaugmented groups. The complication rate was low or showed no increase in the ST augmentation groups compared with control groups.
Conclusion: HT, QT, and BPTB grafts augmented with ST demonstrate an effective method for ACL reconstruction. All graft types with ST augmentation showed no evidence of clinical disadvantage, with some studies indicating significant biomechanical or clinical advantages compared with conventional ACL reconstruction.
Keywords: ACL; allograft; internal brace; suture tape augmentation.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the healing of the quadriceps tendon donor site after partial thickness graft harvesting through ultrasound imaging at a short-term follow-up of 6-month following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to investigate the clinical outcomes.
Methods: Between March 2019 and August 2020, 61 knees were retrospectively included in this study. Intraoperatively, the length, width and thickness of the harvested QT graft were measured. At a 6-month follow-up, patients were assessed by one of five radiologists, following the same protocol to calculate the defect volume, and patients performed a self-evaluation of pain on the Visual Analogue Scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS).
Results: Intraoperatively, the QT grafts had a volume of 4635.4 ± 912.5 mm3. Postoperatively, ultrasound was performed at 6.5 ± 0.7 months, and the defect volume was 323.3 ± 389.2 mm3, representing a healing rate of 93% ± 9% of the donor site. At a minimum 6-month follow-up, IKDC was 61.6 ± 16 and KOOS was 70.2 ± 16.6. Age was significantly associated with the healing rate (β: -0.005; p = 0.032).
Conclusion: At 6 months follow-up, the defect size of the QT donor site had healed by 93 ± 9% leaving a mean defect volume of 323.3 mm3 according to ultrasound measurements. This suggests that the QT has a high capacity for healing after graft harvesting, with 10 patients reaching full defect closure 6 months after surgery. The clinical relevance of these findings is that the quadriceps tendon donor site has high rates of healing, but surgeons should be aware of lower healing rates in older patients.
Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.
Keywords: ACLR; QT; donor site morbidity; ultrasound.
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a devastating injury to athletes of all ages. The current gold standard treatment following complete rupture of the ACL is reconstruction of the torn ligament with autograft or allograft tendon. Commonly used tendon grafts include patellar tendon, hamstring tendon, and quadriceps tendon. Although ligaments and tendons have similar collagen and proteoglycan compositions, they maintain a unique composition and arrangement of cells to serve their unique biomechanical needs. Therefore, following ACL reconstruction (ACLR), the implanted tendon tissue undergoes a process of remodeling which is termed "ligamentization". The process of ligamentization is divided into three main phases, which include the early healing phase, the proliferative phase, and the maturation phase. Following the process of ligamentization, the graft tissue closely mimics the appearance of ligament tissue on an ultrastructural level. Successful outcome following ACLR is contingent upon adequate remodeling of the tissue as well as healing of the graft within the bone tunnels in the femur and tibia. Choice of graft has individual implications regarding their associated risk of complications, failure, and infection. The purpose of this review is to summarize the process of ligamentization and graft healing and to discuss how graft type influences the rate and types of complications, failures, and infections.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL); complications; graft healing; ligamentization; reconstruction.
2024 Annals of Joint. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the infection rate following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (ASTQT) autograft.
Methods: All primary ASTQT autograft ACLRs within a single surgeon's prospectively collected database from 2011 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. No topical antibiotics were administered and no graft-soaking with antibiotics was performed during the study period. Patients who underwent multiligament knee reconstruction or a cartilage restoration procedure were excluded. Patients who underwent a subsequent procedure, including irrigation and debridement (I&D) of the knee joint, were included. Case-specific data, including fluid culture analysis, antibiotics (type, route of administration and duration), time to debridement and method of debridement, were collected. Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze demographics, incidence and possible association between the need for I&D and concomitant meniscus surgery.
Results: Out of 1053 cases (mean age: 20.2 ± 6.3, 44.6% female), four patients (0.38%) (mean age: 18.5 ± 4.0, 25% female) underwent subsequent I&D (arthroscopic I&D only [n = 1], graft harvest site I&D only [n = 1], combined graft harvest site and arthroscopic I&D [n = 1] and tibia wound and arthroscopic I&D [n = 1]). There was no significant difference with regard to demographics. No joint fluid cultures returned positive; one wound culture returned positive for Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus from their graft harvest site. The time to I&D ranged from 18 to 23 days. Concomitant meniscectomy or meniscal repair was not associated with requiring surgical I&D. All patients who underwent I&D were prescribed antibiotics for a minimum of 10 days and a maximum of 31 days (mean: 16.25 days). Three patients (75%) who underwent I&D ultimately returned to sport. One patient was lost to follow-up. ACL grafts were retained in all patients.
Conclusion: The incidence of culture-positive septic arthritis following ASTQT autograft ACLR is 0%, while the overall need for I&D of 0.38% is low and not related to concomitant meniscal procedures or patient-specific factors.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Keywords: all‐soft tissue quadriceps tendon; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; infection; quadriceps tendon autograft; septic arthritis.
© 2024 European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: To compare patient-reported outcomes measurements and subsequent surgical interventions in patients treated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using either quadriceps tendon autograft with a patellar bone block (bQT) or soft tissue only (sQT).
Methods: All ACLRs performed between January 2010 and March 2022 were prospectively followed for 24 months and retrospectively evaluated. All primary ACLRs with full 24 months of follow-up data, without any previous surgery or any additional ligamentous interventions, were matched for major ACL risk factors, including sex, age, Tegner activity level [TAL], pivoting sports, and concomitant injuries. Patient-reported outcomes measurements (Lysholm score, visual analog scale for pain, and TAL) and subsequent surgical interventions were registered after 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the influence of graft type, age, preinjury TAL, sex, pivoting sports, and concomitant interventions on the need to undergo subsequent surgery.
Results: After matching, 246 patients were included in the final analysis. Both groups did not differ regarding any preoperative patient demographics or intraoperative details. At final follow-up, no significant differences in mean Lysholm score (sQT: 90.8 ± 10.6, bQT: 91.8 ± 10.6, P = .46), median TAL (sQT: 6 [1-10], bQT: 6 [1-10], P = .53), and visual analog scale for pain (sQT: 0.7 ± 1.1, bQT: 0.7 ± 1.2, P = .70) were reported between both groups. A total of 70.3% (sQT-A: 70.7%, bQT: 69.9%, P = .89) of patients returned to or exceeded their preinjury activity level. In terms of revision ACLR, there was no statistically significant difference between bQT (3.3%) and sQT (4.1%). Similarly, no difference was observed in contralateral ACLR (bQT: 7.3% sQT: 11.4%). Regression analysis indicated that none of the studied factors, including the use of a patellar bone block, influenced subsequent surgery, revision ACLR, or contralateral ACLR.
Conclusions: Harvesting an additional patellar bone block in quadriceps tendon ACLR does not seem to affect postoperative patient-reported outcomes, ACL revision, or contralateral ACL reconstruction rates.
Level of evidence: Level III, cohort study.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
This technical note aimed to present a straigthforward method for harvesting quadriceps tendon autografts with the use of a simple vaginal speculum and direct visualisation of a scope. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autografts has gained popularity in recent years, with many harvesting techniques that use different harvesting systems available on the market. These techniques vary from transverse to longitudinal skin incisions and from open to minimally invasive approaches and have a learning curve, as with the majority of surgical procedures. The technique proposed in this technical note is minimally invasive, can be easily reproduced by any surgeon irrespective of their experience, has a short learning curve, requires no additional cost or technical support during the procedure and creates a stable working space that allows for freedom of manipulation of surgical instruments and the arthroscope.
Keywords: Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Arthroscopic Surgery; Autografting; Greece; Knee; Quadriceps Muscle.
© Copyright 2024, Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, All Rights Reserved.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is pivotal for restoring knee stability and function in individuals with ACL injuries. While bone-patellar tendon-bone (PT), hamstring tendon (HT), and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts are commonly employed, their comparative effectiveness remains a subject of ongoing research. This study aims to comprehensively compare the functional outcomes, knee stability, revision rates, and incidence of anterior knee pain associated with these autografts.
Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, adult male participants undergoing primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction were randomized into three groups (PT, HT, QT) using a computer-generated sequence with allocation concealment. Blinded assessments were conducted at 2-, 6-, and 12-months post-surgery to evaluate knee function, stability, and patient satisfaction. The rehabilitation protocol was standardized across groups, including specific exercises and cryotherapy, to minimize postoperative swelling and pain.
Results: A total of 75 participants were followed for 12 months post-surgery. While significant improvements in knee function and stability were observed across all groups, there were no statistically significant differences between the autograft types in terms of revision rates or the incidence of anterior knee pain. Detailed statistical analysis revealed effect sizes and confidence intervals, substantiating the clinical relevance of the findings.
Conclusion: PT, HT, and QT autografts each provide favorable outcomes for ACL reconstruction without significant differences in efficacy up to one year postoperatively.Level of Evidence: Level 2 (Randomized Clinical Trial).
Keywords: Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Hamstring Tendon; Patella Tendon Graft; Quadriceps Tendon; Tendon Graft.
© 2024 Iran University of Medical Sciences.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common, particularly among athletes, and often result in knee instability and decreased functionality. Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is the standard treatment, typically using a patellar tendon bone graft (PTBG) or hamstring tendon graft (HTG). The central quadriceps tendon graft (QTG) has been proposed as a superior alternative due to its structural properties.
Methodology: This study involved patients undergoing ACL reconstruction using the central quadriceps tendon graft. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Tegner Lysholm knee score were assessed at preoperative and postoperative intervals of two weeks, three months, and six months. Statistical analysis compared these scores over time.
Results: Among the subjects, 90.6% were male and 9.4% were female. Injuries primarily resulted from sports activities and road traffic accidents (46.9% each). Right-side injuries were more prevalent (65.6%). The mean time from injury to surgery was 9.37 months. The mean graft size was 8.75 mm, and the mean tourniquet time was 105.94 minutes. Preoperative tests showed positive results for anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot shift tests in most patients, which were negative postoperatively. Significant improvements in knee flexion and Lysholm knee scores were observed. Preoperative knee flexion ranged from 0-100° to 0-120°, improving to 0-120° to 0-130° six months postoperatively. The mean Lysholm knee score improved from 47.06 preoperatively to 93.16 at six months. Excellent outcomes were seen in 78.1% of the patients, with 21.9% achieving good outcomes.
Conclusion: The central quadriceps tendon graft is an effective option for ACL reconstruction, offering excellent functional outcomes and low complication rates. It shows promise as a better alternative to traditional graft types, although further research is necessary to confirm these findings.
Keywords: acl reconstruction; anterior cruciate ligament; arthroscopy; knee stability; quadriceps tendon graft; sports injuries; tegner lysholm knee score.
Copyright © 2024, Parameshwar et al.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: Rectangular tunnel and graft have been recently designed to closely resemble the native anatomy in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study was performed to compare the short-term clinical outcomes between rectangular and round femoral tunnels in ACLR using quadriceps tendon-patellar bone (QTPB) autografts.
Methods: A total of 78 patients who underwent primary ACLR with QTPB autografts performed by three senior surgeons and had at least 1 year of postoperative follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent rectangular tunnel ACLR (n = 40) were compared to those treated with the conventional round tunnel ACLR (n = 38). Outcomes including knee stability, clinical scores, quadriceps strength, associated complications, postoperative knee range of motion, and cross-sectional area of the graft were assessed.
Results: Significant improvements in knee stability and clinical scores were observed after surgery in both groups (all p < 0.001). The postoperative measurements of knee stability and clinical scores were not significantly different between the two groups. Knee extension strength deficit at 60°/sec was significantly less in the rectangular tunnel group than in the round tunnel group at postoperative 6 months (41.7% vs. 48.9%, p = 0.032). The cross-sectional area of the partial-thickness QTPB graft was approximately 60% of the full-thickness QTPB graft.
Conclusions: In the short-term, rectangular tunnel ACLR was comparable to round tunnel ACLR with QTPB autograft despite the smaller cross-sectional area. Additionally, the rectangular tunnel ACLR allowed partial-thickness grafting technique, which could subsequently reduce early donor site morbidity.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Quadriceps muscle.
Copyright © 2024 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reinjury risk is high in young athletes, with graft failure rates as high as 23%. The optimal autograft choice to minimize reinjury risk in this population is unclear.
Purpose: To compare graft failure rates between bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), hamstring tendon (HT), and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts in patients aged ≤18 years with a minimum follow-up (FU) of 24 months.
Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature between database inception and March 2022 encompassed PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Studies on autograft ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using HT, QT, or BPTB autograft in patients ≤18 years old with a minimum FU of 2 years were included. Graft failure rates were pooled and estimated using random-effects models via the inverse variance method and logit transformations. Meta-analyses were used to estimate failure rates and pairwise comparisons were conducted by autograft type when appropriate.
Results: A total of 24 studies comprising 2299 patients (HT: n = 1237, 44.8% female, 59.1-month mean FU; BPTB: n = 913, 67.3% female, 79.9-month mean FU; QT: n = 149, 36.4% female, 35.3-month mean FU) were included. HT exhibited the highest failure rate at 11.8% (95% CI, 9.0%-15.4%); failure rates for BPTB and QT were 7.9% (95% CI, 6.2%-10.0%) and 2.7% (95% CI, 1.0%-7.5%), respectively. HT had a significantly higher failure rate than both BPTB (Q = 5.01; P = .025) and QT (Q = 7.70; P = .006); BPTB had a significantly higher failure rate than QT (Q = 4.01; P = .045). Male patients were less likely than their female counterparts to experience graft failure after HT ACLR (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.95).
Conclusion: While the HT remains a common choice for ACLR, the current aggregate data indicate that BPTB and QT demonstrated significantly lower failure rates than HT ACLR in adolescent athletes ≤18 years old. The QT demonstrated the lowest failure rate in adolescents but also the lowest proportion of patients represented due to a paucity of published QT data, indicating a need for future studies with larger sample sizes that include QT autografts, reduced risk of bias, and consistent reporting on skeletal maturity and surgical technique to better determine the ideal autograft for active athletic populations ≤18 years old.
Keywords: ACL; adolescent; athlete; graft failure; knee.
© 2024 The Author(s).
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: The ideal graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) in young athletes has a high return-to-sport (RTS) rate and a low reinjury rate. Quadriceps tendon autografts are being used with increasing frequency for ACLR in this population, despite a paucity of evidence to support their use.
Purpose: To report the RTS rate, ipsilateral reinjury rate, and contralateral ACL injury rate in a young athletic population undergoing primary ACLR using an all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (ASTQT) autograft.
Study design: Cases series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: Patients aged 14 to 22 years who underwent primary ACLR using an ASTQT autograft by a single surgeon between January 1, 2005, and April 30, 2020, were identified via electronic medical records and contacted ≥24 months after ACLR to complete a survey regarding subsequent ipsilateral or contralateral ACL injuries and RTS. Patients who had undergone previous ACLR (ipsilateral or contralateral) were excluded.
Results: A total of 656 patients (330 male, 326 female; mean age, 17.9 years) were identified, and 395 patients completed the survey (60.2%; 174 male, 221 female; mean age, 17.8 years) with a mean follow-up of 73 ± 29 months (range, 24-139 months). The RTS rate was high (male: 87.7%; female: 82.8%; P = .19). Male and female patients had similar rates of revision ACLR (male: 12.6%; female: 10.0%; P = .40) and contralateral ACL injuries (male: 13.8%; female: 11.3%; P = .46).
Conclusion: A high RTS rate and similar rates of ipsilateral and contralateral ACL injuries were found for male and female patients in a young athletic population undergoing primary ACLR using an ASTQT autograft. These results help one to better understand the utility of ASTQT grafts to support successful ACLR in young athletic populations, for which ASTQT grafts appear to yield favorable outcomes.
Keywords: ACL; athlete; pediatric; quadriceps tendon autograft; reinjury; return to sport; young adult.
Year of publishing
2025
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (r-ACLR) using hamstring tendon (HT) autografts with those using either quadriceps tendon (QT) or bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts or allografts.
Methods: Three databases were searched on 8 August 2023. The authors adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on demographics, surgical details, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), rates of instability, failure and return to sport (RTS) were extracted.
Results: Eleven studies comprising 859 patients were included in this review. Five studies compared HT and QT autografts. One study each reported greater IKDC scores (p = 0.04) and Tegner scores (p = 0.04) in the QT group, while one study each reported higher anterior translation (p = 0.04), rates of positive pivot shift (p = 0.03) and rates of failure (p = 0.03) in the HT group. Six studies compared HT and BPTB autografts with one study each reporting greater Lysholm scores (p = 0.02) and less side-to-side anterior laxity (p < 0.01) in the BPTB group. Two studies compared HT autografts with allografts with only one study reporting a faster time to RTS in the HT group than the allograft group (p < 0.001). All other comparisons were not significant.
Conclusions: HT autografts result in either similar or inferior outcomes in r-ACLR when compared to QT or BPTB autograft options. Allografts resulted in similar outcomes to HT autografts apart from greater time to RTS for r-ACLR.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; graft; hamstring; reoperation; revision.
© 2024 The Author(s). Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft has become increasingly popular for primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Although there are a variety of techniques available for performing quadriceps tendon autograft harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, a minimally invasive, all-soft tissue harvest technique can result in a reproducible, reliable graft while minimizing donor-site morbidity. In this Technical Note, we describe our preferred technique for quadriceps tendon autograft harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
© 2024 The Authors.
Year of publishing
2024
Background: Both adductor canal block (ACB) and local infiltration (LI) are effective for postoperative pain management after arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). While LI is a more straightforward procedure, its effectiveness remains debated.
Purpose: To evaluate morphine consumption within 48 hours after ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft, comparing ACB and LI; secondary objectives: to evaluate pain levels, patient satisfaction, quadriceps strength, range of knee motion, and complications.
Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods: Patients undergoing primary ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft were randomized to receive either ACB (0.25% bupivacaine; 20 mL) or LI at the surgical wound, graft harvest area, and intra-articular injection. The LI group received morphine (3 mg), ketorolac (30 mg), and tranexamic acid (1 g). Morphine consumption within 48 hours was monitored using an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device.
Results: A total of 48 patients were analyzed (n = 24 in each group); baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The LI group consumed significantly less morphine than the ACB group at 6 hours (median [interquartile range, IQR], 3 mg [0-4.8 mg] for the LI group vs 5.5 mg [2-9] for the ACB group; P = .003). However, no significant differences were observed in morphine consumption at other time points. Additionally, no significant difference was found in cumulative morphine consumption at 48 hours between the groups (median [IQR], 21.5 mg [11-34.5 mg] for the ACB group vs 16.5 mg [8.5-21.8 mg] for the LI group; P = .137). Postoperative pain scores, quadriceps strength, and patient satisfaction were similar between the 2 groups.
Conclusion: Morphine consumption at 48 hours postoperatively was comparable between the LI and ACB groups, and no significant group differences were found in postoperative pain, quadriceps strength, or patient satisfaction.
Registration: TCTR20190320003 (Thai Clinical Trial Registry).
Keywords: adductor canal block; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; local analgesia; morphine consumption; postoperative pain control.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: To identify prognostic factors associated with a delayed return-to-sport (RTS) time in amateur athletes who return to full participation after a primary isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed among athletes who underwent ACL reconstruction between October 2014 and October 2021. Inclusion criteria were any amateur athletes with an ACL reconstruction who had a documented RTS and greater than 1-year follow-up. Nonathletes, those with multiligamentous knee injury, and those missing documented RTS timelines were excluded. RTS was defined as participation in athletics at a level equivalent to or greater than the preinjury level participation. Demographic and prognostic factors, including previous knee surgery, meniscal involvement, level of participation, surgical approach, and graft type, were recorded along with RTS time and analyzed via Poisson regression.
Results: In total, 91 athletes, average age 18.8 (± 6.7) years, who underwent ACL reconstruction at a single institution from 2014 to 2021 were identified with an average follow-up time of 4.6 (± 2.5) years (range 1.1, 9.0). Meniscal involvement (1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.15, P < .001) and previous knee surgery (1.43; 95% CI 1.29-1.58; P < .001) were related to a delayed RTS. Quadriceps tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts, as well as allograft, showed a significant association with a longer RTS time when compared with hamstring autograft (1.16, 95% CI 1.13-1.20, P < .001; 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, P = .020; 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.19, P = .004, respectively), as did anteromedial portal drilling, when compared with the outside in approach for femoral drilling (1.19, 95% CI 1.16-1.23, P < .001).
Conclusions: Previous knee surgery, anteromedial femoral drilling, quadriceps tendon autograft, and meniscus tear were most associated with a delayed timeline for RTS among young athletes who were able to return.
Level of evidence: Level IV, prognostic case series.
© 2024 The Authors.
Year of publishing
2024
Purpose: To evaluate ≥2-year patient outcomes after primary all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft (ASTQ) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with suture tape augmentation (STA) in skeletally mature high school and collegiate athletes.
Methods: All high school and collegiate athletes who underwent primary ASTQ ACLR with STA with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were administered validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) pre- and postoperatively. The minimal clinically important difference was calculated for each PROM based on this study population and applied to the individual patient. Return to sport, subsequent surgical intervention including contralateral ACLR, and KT-1000 arthrometer measurements for knee laxity were collected. Complications were assessed by physical examination, radiologic studies, or obtained via telephone.
Results: In total, 60 patients were included in the final data analysis, with a mean age of 16.8 years (95% confidence interval 13-23) and mean final follow-up of 37.1 months (95% confidence interval 33.1-41.1). Twelve patients (20%) required subsequent surgery on the ipsilateral knee, which included 7 patients having a subsequent meniscal procedure and 3 patients who underwent arthrolysis. None sustained a graft failure, and 6 patients sustained a contralateral ACL injury necessitating surgery. All PROMs improved at the final follow-up (P < .001). In addition, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements significantly improved postoperatively at 1-year clinical follow-up (P < .001). Most patients obtained the minimal clinically important difference thresholds for each PROM at the final follow-up. There were 48 patients (80%) who participated in pivoting sports. The return-to-sport rate at same level was 54 patients (90%), with 6 patients (10%) not returning to the same level because of graduation.
Conclusions: ASTQ ACLR with STA in a young athletic patient population may result in a low graft failure rate while maintaining satisfactory patient outcomes at short-term follow-up, including a return to sport at the same level of 90%.
Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.
Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: To compare return-to-sport (RTS) rates, graft failure rates, and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (R-ACLR) with additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) versus isolated R-ACLR.
Methods: A retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent R-ACLR with or without a modified Lemaire LET procedure was performed. Seventy-four patients with at least 2 years of follow-up who had high-grade positive pivot-shift test findings were included. Concomitant procedures such as meniscectomy and meniscal repair were collected, along with any complications and/or graft failure. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score were collected. The ability to RTS was defined as fully, partially, or not returned.
Results: Of the patients, 39 underwent isolated R-ACLR (mean age ± standard deviation, 29.2 ± 12.2 years) whereas 35 underwent an additional LET procedure (mean age, 24.6 ± 7.4 years). The mean length of follow-up in the R-ACLR group was 56.6 ± 26.5 months compared with 44.3 ± 17.6 months in the R-ACLR-LET group (P = .02) (range, 24-120 months). Patient-reported outcome measures were higher in the R-ACLR-LET group, with the KOOS Activities of Daily Living (93.5 ± 2.0 vs 97.2 ± 1.6, P = .03) and KOOS Sport (63.0 ± 3.6 vs 74.3 ± 3.8, P = .05) subdomain scores reaching the level of statistical significance. No differences were found in the other KOOS subdomain scores or the International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Failure rates were not significantly different between the groups (12.8% for R-ACLR vs 11.4% for R-ACLR-LET, P = .99). There were 13 patients (72.2%) in the R-ACLR group and 14 patients (60.8%) in the R-ACLR-LET group who did not RTS.
Conclusions: R-ACLR with additional LET showed similar failure and RTS rates to isolated R-ACLR after failed ACLR. The R-ACLR-LET group showed better functional results with significantly higher KOOS subdomain scores for activities of daily living, as well as sports and recreation. However, this study was unable to recommend the modified Lemaire LET procedure to be routinely used in R-ACLR patients.
Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.
Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction between methods using quadriceps tendon with bone (QTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) in patients with hyperextension of the knee.
Methods: The medical records of patients with knee hyperextension greater than 8° who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between October 2010 and October 2020 with follow-up for at least 2 years (median, 3 years; interquartile range [IQR], 2.0-4.6 years) were retrospectively reviewed. Side-to-side difference in anterior translation, pivot-shift test grade, Lysholm score, and graft intensity using the Howell grade on magnetic resonance imaging at final follow-up were compared between the QTB and HT groups.
Results: The HT and QTB groups consisted of 42 patients and 21 patients, respectively. The overall mean age was 21.5 years (range, 14-48 years), and the median Tegner Activity Scale score was 6 (range, 3-9). Postoperatively, the median side-to-side difference in anterior translation was 1.75 mm (IQR, 1-3 mm) in the HT group and 1.0 mm (IQR, 0-1.75 mm) in the QTB group (P = .01). Pivot-shift testing showed grade 0 in 74.7%, grade 1 in 18.7%, and grade 2 in 6.6% of patients in the HT group and grade 0 in 85.7% and grade 1 in 14.3% of those in the QTB group (P = .03). The median postoperative Lysholm score was 99 in both groups. Graft signal intensity showed a significant between-group difference: grade I in 52%, grade II in 36%, and grade III in 12% of patients in the HT group versus grade I in 85.7%, grade II in 9.5%, and grade III in 4.8% of those in the QTB group (P = .03).
Conclusions: In patients who underwent ACL reconstruction for hyperextension of the knee, QTB yielded better clinical outcomes than HT with respect to anterior stability, rotational stability, and graft signal intensity on median 2-year follow-up magnetic resonance imaging.
Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective case-control study.
Copyright © 2023 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the validity and informational value of teaching material regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft provided on the YouTube video platform.
Methods: An extensive systematic search of the YouTube video platform was performed, and all videos that met the criteria were included in the analysis. The analysis of the video content was performed using the DISCERN instrument, Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score (GQS). The duration of the videos, the date of publication, and the number of likes and views were recorded. Furthermore, videos were categorized based on the source (physicians, companies, patients), the subject (surgical technique, patient experience and overview [overview videos were videos in which multiple aspects were analyzed]), and the type of content (educational or subjective patient experience).
Results: A total of 88 videos were included in the analysis. Seventy-one (80.7%) videos were published by physicians, 15 (17.0%) by patients, and 2 (2.3%) by companies. The majority of the videos described various surgical techniques (59%-67.0%), 80.7% of the videos (72%-81.8%) had an educational nature, and the remaining 18.2% described patient experiences. The mean length of the videos was 8.21 ± 7.88 minutes. The mean number of views was 3,988.51 ± 9,792.98 (range 9-56,047), whereas the mean numbers of comments and likes were 30.07 ± 70.07 (range 0-493) and 4.48 ± 14.22 (range 0-82), respectively. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 27.43 ±11.56 (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.01-29.85; range: 17-68), 1.22 ± 0.85 (95% CI 1.04-1.40; range 0-3), and 1.82 ± 0.93 (95% CI 1.63-2.01; range 1-4), respectively. For all scores, videos published by physicians had greater quality (DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS) (P < .05). Among all of the analyzed videos, overview videos were of the highest quality (P < .05).
Conclusions: YouTube is a fast and open-access source of mass information. The overall quality of the videos on ACLR performed using QT autograft was unsatisfactory, demonstrating low educational quality and reliability. Currently, YouTube cannot be recommended as a reliable source of information on ACLR with the QT.
Clinical relevance: Surgeons treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries should take special care when suggesting outside sources for patients to use to further educate themselves about this procedure. Due to the poor quality of the content, orthopaedic health care professionals should alert patients about the inaccuracies of YouTube videos addressing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the quadriceps tendon. Additionally, health care practitioners should attempt to offer patients better options.
Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Quadriceps tendon autografts are an increasingly popular choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, with decreased donor-site morbidity alongside good patient outcomes. Although harvesting of the tendon can be done in a minimally invasive fashion, this introduces some difficulty with visualization and consistency of graft sizing. The purpose of this Technical Note and video is to provide a method of quadriceps tendon autograft harvesting using the Quadriceps Tendon Harvest Guide System (QUADTRAC) in a single-bundle ACL reconstruction.
© 2023 The Authors.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
We present a technique for the combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction using the superficial layer quadriceps tendon graft. Anatomic reconstruction is achieved with outside-in femoral tunnel drilling. The femoral drill guide has an intra-articular placement at the femoral footprint of the ACL and an extra-articular placement at the femoral ALL attachment. This surgical technique does not need any special instruments and consists of 3 bone tunnels. The long length and customized superficial quadriceps tendon graft is harvested in a minimally invasive manner and allows an accessible and low-cost reconstruction of both ligaments.
© 2024 The Authors.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether there are patient-reported outcome differences in bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), quadriceps tendon (QT), and hamstring (HS) grafts of comparable size.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of global registry data to include all patients who had an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with BPTB, QT, or HS autograft of at least 9 mm in diameter between 2010 and 2021 with complete 1- and 2-year outcome scores. We compared 1- and 2-year postoperative outcome scores (visual analog scale [VAS], Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] pain, Marx Activity Rating Scale [MARS], Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey [VR-12]) between BPTB, QT, and HS of the same size graft.
Results: In total, 2,318 subjects were included in the analysis, and all graft types showed improved patient-reported outcome measures at 1 and 2 years postoperatively when compared with baseline. The KOOS pain score for the BPTB group was significantly better than the HS (between-group difference = 2.71, P < .01) and QT (between-group difference = 2.51, P < .01) groups at 1 year, and the BPTB group was better than HS (between-group difference = 1.88, P < .01) at 2 years. However, the differences were small and not clinically meaningful. When we compared graft type, there were no differences in the percentage of patients who reached Minimal clinically important difference, or clinical scores VAS or MARS at 2-year follow-up.
Conclusions: There is no clinically meaningful difference in KOOS-pain, VR-12, VAS, and MARS at 1 and 2 years postoperatively in patients having anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with BPTB, HS, or QT if graft size is at least 9 mm in diameter.
Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: The quadriceps tendon (QT) has recently gained increasing interest as an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) graft due to minimally invasive harvesting techniques and low donor site morbidity. QT grafts can be used both with a patella bone block and as complete soft tissue grafts. However, it is unknown whether the QT graft type affects clinical outcomes. This study used data from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry (DKRR) to compare revision rates, knee stability and subjective clinical outcomes in patients who underwent ACLR with QT graft with bone block (QT-B) or soft tissue only (QT-S).
Methods: Patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction with QT autografts documented in the DKRR were included and divided into the QT-B (n = 925) and QT-S (n = 659) groups. The clinical outcome was evaluated using objective-instrumented knee stability, pivot shift test, knee injury osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and Tegner activity scores for the two cohorts performed at the 1-year follow-up. The overall revision rates were determined as well.
Results: Revision rates at 2 years were equally low in both graft groups at 2.8%. Similarly, post-operative knee laxity was equal at 1.5 (1.4) and 1.6 (1.4) mm side-to-side laxity, respectively. However, QT-B exhibited a reduced post-operative positive pivot shift of 22% compared with 31% for QT-S. Although the subjective outcomes were equal for the KOOS and Tegner activity scale scores at the 1-year follow-up, reduced improvements in KOOS were observed for QT-B compared to QT-S.
Conclusion: ACL with a QT autograft harvested either with a bone block or as a soft tissue graft exhibited comparable revision rates and sagittal knee stability. Furthermore, ACL reconstruction using a QT graft with a bone block achieved better rotational stability with less pivot shift than ACL reconstruction using complete soft tissue QT grafts.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; clinical outcomes; hamstring tendon; patellar tendon; quadriceps tendon.
© 2024 The Author(s). Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: This study sought to quantify the tunnel widening associated with quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and compare it to bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts.
Methods: A retrospective review of each ACLR performed at a single academic institution from 2011 to 2021 were reviewed. Subjects with repeat ipsilateral knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies performed after ACLR were included. Two reviewers independently measured the maximum diameter of the femoral and tibial tunnels 1 cm from the aperture. Tunnel widening was calculated as the difference between the initial drilled diameter and the measured diameters.
Results: Seventy-five patients (38 BTB and 37 QT autografts) were identified including 42 females and 33 males. With respect to graft type (QT vs. BTB), there was no statistically significant difference in median patient age (19.0 (16.0-31.5) years vs. 20.0 (16.8-30.0) years respectively; p = n.s.) or median time to MRI (12.0 [9.0-19.5] months vs. 13.0 [7.0-43.3] months respectively, p = n.s.). Mean tunnel diameter changes or widening was statistically significantly greater for QT autografts than BTB autografts at the tibial tunnel: (0.4 [±0.6] mm] vs. -0.4 [±1.1 mm; p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean tunnel diameter change was also significantly greater at the femoral tunnel for QT compared to BTB. (0.2 [±0.6] mm vs. -0.4 [±0.8] mm; p < 0.001) However, no patients with QT grafts demonstrated tibial or femoral tunnel diameters >12 mm.
Conclusion: Although QT autografts had a statistically significant greater amount of tunnel widening compared to BTB autografts; the mean tibial and femoral net widening of 0.4 mm and 0.2 mm, respectively, does not meet previously reported clinically significant values. Thus, the tunnel widening presented in this study is unlikely to affect clinical outcomes and should not preclude the use of either graft.
Level of evidence: Level III (Retrospective comparative study).
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; bone–patellar tendon–bone graft; quadriceps tendon graft; tunnel widening.
© 2024 European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: Despite increasing use of quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), limited data exist regarding its outcomes in high-risk adolescent athletes.
Purpose: To (1) report the outcomes after QT ACLR in adolescent athletes and (2) identify patient-related and surgery-related factors that may influence failure rates after QT ACLR.
Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: All patients aged 14 to 17 years who underwent primary anatomic, transphyseal, single-bundle QT ACLR between 2010 and 2021 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included for analysis. Demographic and surgical data as well as preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Marx activity scores were collected retrospectively. All patients were also contacted to assess postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including IKDC and Marx activity scores, and return-to-sports (RTS) data. Outcomes of interest included rates of revision ACLR and ipsilateral complications, contralateral ACL tears, difference in pre- and postoperative PROs, and rates of RTS. Patient and surgical characteristics were compared between groups who required revision ACLR versus those who did not.
Results: A total of 162 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 89 adolescent athletes (mean age 16.2 ± 1.1 years, 64% female) were included for analysis at mean follow-up of 4.0 years. Postoperative IKDC scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores (88.5 vs 37.5; P < .001), whereas Marx activity scores decreased postoperatively (14.3 vs 12.2; P = .011). Successful RTS occurred in 80% of patients at a mean time of 9.7 ± 6.9 months, and 85% of these patients returned to the same or higher level of sports. The most common reasons for failure to RTS included lack of time (n = 7, 70%) and fearing reinjury in the operative knee (n = 5, 50%). The overall revision ACLR rate was 10% (n = 9), and contralateral ACL tears occurred in 14% (n = 12) of patients. The overall ipsilateral knee reoperation rate was 22.5% (n = 20). No statistically significant differences in patient or surgical characteristics were observed between patients who underwent revision ACLR and those who did not.
Conclusion: At a minimum 2-year follow-up after QT ACLR, adolescent athletes experienced significantly improved postoperative IKDC scores, high rates of RTS, and low rates of graft failure, despite a relatively high ipsilateral reoperation rate. Surgeons may utilize this information when identifying the optimal graft choice for adolescent athletes who have sustained an ACL injury and wish to return to high level of sporting activities.
Keywords: ACL; adolescent athletes; general; knee ligaments; quadriceps tendon.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: Quadriceps tendon autograft (QTA) has recently gained popularity in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures in pediatric patients. The addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) to an ACL reconstruction (ACLR) has been found to reduce the risk of ACL retear in high-risk patients.
Purpose: To (1) compare ACL graft maturity using signal intensity ratios (SIRs) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in skeletally immature patients undergoing ACLR with QTA either with or without concomitant LET and (2) evaluate LET safety by calculating the physeal disturbance-related reoperation rate in the ACLR+LET group.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: The records of patients aged ≤18 years who underwent ACLR between 2015 and 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients undergoing ACLR with QTA who had open distal femoral and proximal tibial physes on MRI scans and a minimum 2-year follow-up data were included. SIR values were measured on sagittal MRI scans by averaging the signal at 3 regions of interest along the ACL graft and dividing by the signal of the posterior cruciate ligament at its insertion. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate differences in SIR values at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively in patients who underwent ACLR alone versus ACLR+LET.
Results: Overall, 29 patients were included in the study: 16 patients in the ACLR+LET group and 13 patients in the ACLR-only group. There were no significant differences in SIR values between groups at the 6-month or 1-year postoperative timepoints. At 2 years postoperatively, the median SIR of the ACLR+LET group was significantly lower than that of the ACLR-only group on both univariate (1.33 vs 1.86, respectively, P = .0012) and multivariate regression analyses adjusting for both sex and surgical technique (β = -0.49 [95% CI, -0.91 to -0.05]; P = .029). There were no cases of reoperation for physeal disturbance in patients who underwent ACLR+LET.
Conclusion: The addition of LET to an ACLR with QTA was associated with lower average SIR values and thus improved graft maturity at 2 years postoperatively compared with ACLR alone in skeletally immature patients. The addition of LET to an ACLR was found to be safe in skeletally immature patients.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; pediatrics; quadriceps tendon autograft; sports.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: Quadriceps tendon (QT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are widely used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but the optimal autograft choice remains controversial. This study assessed the treatment effects of QT versus BPTB and HT autografts for ACLR.
Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published from inception until July 2022. Effect estimates were presented as odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. All pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model.
Results: Twenty-one studies (3 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 3 prospective studies, and 15 retrospective studies) involving 2964 patients with ACLR were selected for meta-analysis. Compared with the HT autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of graft failure (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23-0.93; P = 0.031). Compared with the BPTB autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of donor site pain (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.10-0.24; P < 0.001). Moreover, the QT autograft was associated with a lower side-to-side difference than that observed with the HT autograft (WMD: - 0.74; 95% CI: - 1.47 to - 0.01; P = 0.048). Finally, compared with the BPTB autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of moderate-to-severe kneecap symptoms during sports and work activities (OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.05-0.37; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that the QT autograft can be defined as a safe and effective alternative choice for ACLR, but its superiority is yet to be proven by RCTs and prospective studies. Level of evidence Level III.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Bone–patellar tendon–bone; Hamstring tendon autografts; Meta-analysis; Quadriceps tendon autograft.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft is an increasingly utilized technique that confers less donor site morbidity and comparable outcomes to other historically used graft options. The graft harvest and implantation process present vast variability-particularly regarding the achievement of adequate graft site visualization, consistently attaining a uniform and appropriately sized graft, and subsequent reconstruction of the ACL with the all-soft tissue graft. The purpose of this Technical Note and video is to describe and demonstrate minimally invasive quadriceps tendon autograft harvesting using the Quadriceps Tendon Harvest Guide System (QUADTRAC), and its subsequent implantation within a single-bundle ACL reconstruction with suspensory fixation.
© 2023 The Authors.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether femoral tunnel length (FTL) affects clinical or functional outcomes following primary Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with single-bundle quadriceps tendon autograft, both with and without a patellar bone block.
Methods: An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was carried out via OVID. Data pertaining to study characteristics, patient demographics, surgical techniques, femoral tunnel length, and subjective/objective clinical outcomes was abstracted. Studies were stratified into two groups based on FTL; a short femoral tunnel (S-FT) group of ≤25 mm, and a long femoral tunnel (L-FT) group of >25 mm. There was a high degree of heterogeneity between studies, prohibiting meta-analysis.
Results: Seven studies comprising 368 total patients with a mean age of 30.3 years (range: 23.4-34 years) were included for analysis. The S-FT group included 126 patients and the L-FT group 242 patients. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant postoperative improvements across both subjective and objective clinical and functional outcomes. Average complication rates were 11.9% (range: 0%-29%) in the S-FT group and 4.5% (range: 1%-14%) in the L-FT group. Ranges of re-rupture rates were 0%-2% and 0%-3% for the S-FT and L-FT groups, respectively (n.s.).
Conclusion: Both S-FT and L-FT groups demonstrated comparable postoperative outcomes following primary ACLR with single bundle quadriceps tendon autograft. There were slightly superior, although non-significant, outcomes reported with short femoral tunnel length, however, this may have been confounded by the variation in surgical technique used.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; arthroscopy; autograft; femoral tunnel length; knee; quadriceps tendon.
© 2024 The Author(s). Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Revision of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction presents numerous challenges not encountered in the primary setting and therefore requires thorough preoperative planning. Addressing tunnel widening is the primary concern, and therefore the appropriate graft choice is pivotal. Quadriceps tendon autograft recently has gained popularity for its dimensions and the possibility to harvest a bone block from the patella that can fill potential tunnel bone defects. Adjunctive procedures to isolated ACL reconstruction such as lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) may help in sharing the loads with the neoligament, with recent findings recommending LET in the revision setting. The technique presented in this Technical Note describes a 1-stage revision ACL combined with LET using a quadriceps tendon autograft with a bone plug.
© 2024 The Authors.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: Anatomic rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ART-ACLR) can mimic the fiber arrangement of the native ACL and restore normal knee biomechanics, compared with the conventional round tunnel ACLR. ART-ACLR using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft can provide satisfactory clinical outcomes; however, some issues such as secondary ACL injury and donor-site morbidity, including postoperative anterior knee pain (AKP), remain to be solved. Due to these issues, quadriceps tendon-bone (QTB) grafts have recently become more popular.
Purpose: To compare the 2-year clinical outcomes of ART-ACLR with BPTB and QTB autografts.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: A total of 134 patients underwent primary ART-ACLR with BPTB (n = 70) or QTB (n = 64). All patients had a minimum follow-up period of 2 years postoperatively. Outcome evaluations included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), side-to-side differences (SSDs) with the KT-1000 knee arthrometer, rate of secondary ACL injury, and incidence of AKP.
Results: Regarding age, sex, height, weight,and concomitant procedures, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. All clinical scores significantly improved from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively and further increased throughout the 2-year postoperative period in both groups. The IKDC and all subscales of the KOOS, except Sport and Recreation, were equivalent between the BPTB and QTB groups at each postoperative time point. There were no significant differences in the SSD value of KT-1000 arthrometer between the 2 groups. The rates of secondary ACL injury were 10.0% on the ipsilateral side and 2.9% on the contralateral side in the BPTB group and 3.1% on the ipsilateral side and 4.7% on the contralateral side in the QTB group, with no significant difference between both groups. The incidence of AKP was 17.1% and 4.9% in the BPTB group and QTB group, respectively, with significance of P = .02).
Conclusion: The clinical scores, SSD value of the KT-1000 arthrometer, and secondary ACL injury rates were equivalent between the BPTB and QTB groups. However, the incidence of AKP was significantly lower in the QTB group, suggesting that QTB could be a favorable graft for ACLR.
Keywords: ACL; anatomic; bone–patellar tendon–bone; knee ligaments; knee, meniscus; quadriceps tendon–bone; rectangular tunnel.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft is a reliable graft option that has recently increased in use. Varying harvesting and graft preparation techniques available and improved technology and implant design continue to make quadricep tendon preparation more efficient and reproducible. In this Technical Note, we describe our preferred technique for all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft preparation after harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
© 2024 The Authors.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Several graft choices have been described for surgeons performing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft has been referred to as the gold standard with which other grafts are compared. Hamstring autograft has been widely used when a soft-tissue graft is desired, such as when physes are open with significant growth remaining, but with greater revision rate than bone-patella tendon-bone in young athletes. Allograft tissue is discouraged in younger patients due to increased re-rupture rate. More recently, quadriceps autograft has been described as another soft tissue graft. Quadriceps tendon grafts do show promise as a soft-tissue graft alternative with a potential drawback of decreased knee extension strength, although longer-term follow-up studies are necessary to evaluate its use in the pediatric population.
Copyright © 2023 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are a common occurrence among athletes and active individuals, often necessitating surgical intervention for optimal recovery. The choice of graft material for ACL reconstruction remains a topic of debate, with various options available, including quadriceps tendon (QT), patellar tendon bone allograft (PTBA), and cadaver graft (CG). This paper aims to provide an extensive review and comparison of the efficacy, outcomes, and complications associated with these graft types based on recent research. A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted to identify relevant studies published in the past six years. The findings suggest that while each graft type has its advantages and limitations, there is no definitive superior choice. Factors such as patient age, activity level, comorbidities, and surgeon preference should be considered when selecting the most appropriate graft for ACL repair surgery. QT grafts are associated with lower donor-site morbidity compared to patellar tendon grafts. However, QT grafts may have a higher risk of graft rupture and decreased knee flexion strength. PTBA grafts, compared to QT grafts, have a higher risk of donor-site morbidity but a lower risk of graft rupture and improved knee stability. CG grafts have lower donor-site morbidity compared to PTBA grafts but may have a higher risk of graft rupture and decreased knee flexion strength compared to PTBA grafts. In conclusion, the choice of graft material for ACL reconstruction is a complex decision that requires careful consideration of various factors, including patient age, activity level, comorbidities, and surgeon preference. While each graft type has its advantages and limitations, there is no definitive superior choice. Therefore, it is essential to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of each graft type to ensure optimal outcomes for patients undergoing ACL repair surgery.
Keywords: acl injury; acl tear; anterior cruciate ligament (acl) injuries; anterior cruciate ligament (acl) reconstruction; athlete's knee; injury; knee ligamentous reconstruction; ligament reconstruction; sport's knee injury.
Copyright © 2024, Krumbach et al.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
The selection of graft type for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains a topic of debate, taking into consideration patient characteristics, as well as the type and level of sports involvement. The aim of this scoping review was to investigate patient characteristics that might influence the selection of graft type for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. PubMed and Scopus were searched to identify articles for inclusion. All included studies focused on one or more patient characteristics involved in the decision-making process regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft, including the hamstrings tendon (HT), patellar tendon (BPTB) and quadriceps tendon (QT). Out of the 1,977 initial studies, 27 studies were included in this review. The BPTB graft seems to be the preferred choice in young patients, females, and athletes-especially those engaged in pivoting sports. The HT graft seems to be the preferred choice in less active and older patients, along with those involved in sports where knee extensors are vital. The HT graft is not preferable in patients with a small body height and graft diameter. Moreover, surgeon preferences were also of importance for graft selection. The success of a specific graft type in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is highly dependent on the patient's characteristics and type of sport. Patient characteristics such as age, gender, body height, graft diameter, and the patient's activity level should all be considered when choosing the appropriate graft type.
Keywords: Age; Body height; Gender; Graft selection; Patient characteristics; Type and level of sports activity.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: Bone patella-tendon bone (BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are the most used grafts in primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions (ACLR) in Norway. Quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has gained more popularity during the past years. The purpose of this study is to compare revision rates and patient-reported outcomes of primary QT with BPTB and HT autograft ACL reconstructions in Norway at 2-year follow-up. It was hypothesized that there would be no difference in 2-year revision rates between all three autografts.
Methods: Data included primary ACLR without concomitant ligament surgeries, registered in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register from 2004 through 2021. Revision rates at 2 years were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) for revision were estimated using multivariable Cox regression analysis with revision within 2 years as endpoint. Mean change in patient-reported outcome was recorded preoperatively and at 2 years through the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subcategories 'Sport' and 'Quality of Life' was measured for patients that were not revised and analysed with multiple linear regression.
Results: A total of 24,790 primary ACLRs were identified, 10,924 with BPTB, 13,263 with HT and 603 with a QT graft. Patients in the QT group were younger (23.5 years), more of them were women (58.2%) and over 50% had surgery <3 months after injury. The QT group had the highest prevalence of meniscal injuries (61.9%). Revision estimates at 2-years were 3.6%, 2.5% and 1.2% for QT, HT and BPTB, respectively (p < 0.001). In a Cox regression analysis with QT as reference, BPTB had a lower risk of revision (HR 0.4, 95% Cl 0.2-0.7, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the revision risk between QT and HT (HR 1.1, 95% Cl 0.7-1.8, n.s.). The two most common reported reasons for revision were: traumatic graft rupture and nontraumatic graft failure. There were no differences between the groups in change of KOOS in subcategories 'Sport' and 'Quality of Life' at 2-years follow-up.
Conclusion: The 2-year risk of revision after ACLR with QT was higher than BPTB and similar to HT. No difference was found between the groups in patient-reported outcomes. This study provides valuable insights for both surgeons and patients when making decisions about the choice of autografts in primary ACL reconstructions.
Level of evidence: Level II.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; clinical outcomes; hamstring tendon; patellar tendonn; quadriceps tendon; revision rate.
© 2024 The Authors. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.
Year of publishing
2024
Background: Variation in stiffness, fixation methods, and donor-site morbidity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with different graft types and with anterior cruciate ligament suture repair (ACLSR) can lead to differences in dynamic knee laxity and consequent differences in posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) development.
Purpose: To compare the incidence of PTOA between different graft types used for primary ACLR and between primary ACLR and ACLSR. It was hypothesized that the incidence of PTOA would vary between ACLR with different autografts and allografts and between ACLR and ACLSR.
Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods: A search of the literature was performed to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing radiographic evidence of PTOA after ACLR between different graft types-hamstring tendon (HT) autograft, bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, quadriceps tendon autograft, and allograft-and between ACLR and ACLSR. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Study quality was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score. A meta-analysis was performed to determine whether there was a difference in the incidence of PTOA between the different graft types and between ACLR and ACLSR.
Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis-HT: 440 patients (mean follow-up, 9.7 years); BPTB: 307 patients (mean follow-up, 11.8 years); allograft: 246 patients (mean follow-up, 5 years); ACLSR, 22 patients (5 years). No study reporting the incidence after ACLR with quadriceps tendon was included. The study quality ranged from 70 to 88. The meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in the incidence of PTOA between graft types used for ACLR and between ACLR and ACLSR (risk ratios: HT vs BPTB, 1.05; HT vs allograft, 0.81; BPTB vs allograft, 0.82; HT vs ACLSR, not estimable [P > .05 for all]). The combined number of patients with PTOA in all studies per graft type showed that patients who underwent ACLR with a BPTB autograft had the highest percentage of PTOA (HT, 23.4%; BPTB, 29.6%; allograft, 8.1%; ACLSR, 0%). However, excluding studies with a follow-up <5 years resulted in similar outcomes for patients with an HT autograft and a BPTB autograft.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis reported no difference in the incidence of PTOA between graft types used for ACLR and between ACLR and ACLSR. More research is necessary to make a reliable conclusion about which technique is associated with the lowest incidence of PTOA after ACL surgery.
Keywords: allograft; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; anterior cruciate ligament repair; bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft; hamstrings tendon autograft; osteoarthritis; quadriceps tendon autograft.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: The potential intra-articular effects of ≥1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with independent suture tape augmentation (STA) are not fully understood.
Purpose: To investigate whether incorporating suture tape in an all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft (QTA) ACLR leads to satisfactory patient outcomes while having no intra-articular side effects as determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: Included were 25 patients with a mean age of 19.9 years (95% CI, 17.3-22.5 years) who underwent QTA ACLR with STA between 2016 and 2019. All patients underwent MRI at ≥1 year postoperatively and had at least a 2-year follow-up (mean, 28 months [95% CI, 26.5-29.5 months]) that included physical examination with anterior laxity testing with KT-1000 arthrometer, radiographs, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). At the final follow-up, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for applicable PROMs were applied to each patient. Postoperative graft and joint integrity were assessed using the Howell classification and the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) joint effusion/synovitis grade. The Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the chi-square or the Fisher exact test for categorical variables were used for statistical analyses.
Results: The MRI assessment of the grafts demonstrated intact grafts in all patients. Overall, 96% of patients demonstrated grades 0 or 1 MOAKS for joint effusion/synovitis. All patient outcomes significantly improved from preoperatively to the final follow-up (P < .001), except for the Marx score, which decreased significantly (14.2 [95% CI, 12.7-15.8] vs 9.72 [95% CI, 7.3-12.2]; P = .0014). At least 68% of the patients achieved the MCID threshold, and 92% achieved the PASS threshold for all applicable PROMs.
Conclusion: QTA ACLR with STA did not demonstrate adverse intra-articular changes on MRI at ≥1 year postoperatively. In addition, STA did not appear to negatively affect PROMs.
Keywords: Howell grade; Osteoarthritis Knee Score; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; anterior cruciate ligament/posterior cruciate ligament ratios; magnetic resonance imaging; suture tape augmentation.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of hamstring tendon (HT) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients aged 50 years or older in terms of patient-reported functional outcomes, graft failure rates, complications, return to sports activity, and sports preference.
Methods: Between 2010 and 2022, prospectively collected data were obtained from an institutional database. Patients aged 50 years or older who underwent primary arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with either HT or QT autograft and had a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Patients with concomitant meniscal, cartilage, and medial collateral ligament injuries were also included. Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction, those undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with a graft other than HT or QT autograft, and those with contralateral knee injuries or ipsilateral osteoarthritis (Ahlbäck stage ≥2) were excluded. Patients were evaluated in terms of the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level, and visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain before injury and at 2-year follow-up, as well as graft failure, QT rupture, and return to sport. The Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze unpaired samples, whereas the Friedman test was used to analyze variables over time. The χ2 statistic test was used to determine differences in categorical data between groups.
Results: The number of patients in the QT and HT groups was 85 and 143, respectively. In the QT and HT groups, the mean age was 54.4 years (range, 50-65 years) and 56.4 years (range, 50-65 years), respectively, and 49% and 51% of patients were men, respectively. The 2 groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, sex, time from injury to surgery, and concomitant injuries. No significant differences in preinjury patient-reported outcome measures, consisting of the Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, and VAS pain score, were found between the 2 groups (P > .05). At the 2-year follow-up, the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level, and VAS pain score improved to preinjury levels and no significant differences in preinjury and 2-year follow-up functional scores were noted between the 2 groups (P > .05). Furthermore, at the 2-year follow-up, the Lysholm score and VAS pain score did not show significant differences (P = .390 and P = .131, respectively) between the QT and HT groups. Similarly, no differences in Tegner activity level were observed between the HT and QT groups at the 2-year follow-up. No significant differences in terms of the minimal clinically important difference were detected between the 2 groups for the Lysholm knee score (P = .410) and Tegner activity level (P = .420). The 2 groups did not differ in terms of patients' percentage of sports participation at baseline and at the 2-year follow-up (P > .05). A significant decrease (P = .01) in participation in skiing/snowboarding was reported in the HT group at the 2-year follow-up compared with baseline (116 patients [81%] vs 98 patients [69%]). No case of graft failure or QT rupture was reported in either group.
Conclusions: Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using HT or QT autografts in athletically active patients aged 50 years or older provides satisfactory patient-reported functional outcomes and allows recovery of the preinjury level of activity.
Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Copyright © 2024 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Introduction: Historically, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures in the paediatric age group were managed conservatively with bracing, casting, activity modification, and physical therapy. However, most of these patients had to reduce their sports activities, and secondary damages to the affected knee were prevalent.
Source of data: Published scientific literature in Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases.
Areas of agreement: ACL reconstruction in children with open physes patients is debated. Any damage to the physes around the knee could lead to growth abnormalities and axial deviation of the knee.
Areas of controversy: Different grafts are available and suitable for ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients; however, which graft performs better remains unclear.
Growing points: This systematic review compared bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), hamstring tendon (HT), and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts for ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. The joint laxity, Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sport, and complications were compared.
Areas timely for developing research: In skeletally immature patients, HT, BPTB, and QT autografts for ACL reconstruction yielded good outcomes. Comparative studies are strongly required to establish the most suitable autograft.
Keywords: ACL; anterior cruciate ligament; autograft; skeletally immature patients; tears.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Purpose: To retrospectively compare strength outcomes of individuals undergoing postoperative rehabilitation following quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with and without blood flow restriction therapy.
Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing ACLR with QT autograft with a minimum of two quantitative postoperative isometric strength assessments via an electromechanical dynamometer (Biodex) was included. Demographics, surgical variables and strength measurement outcomes were compared between patients undergoing blood flow restriction therapy as part of postoperative rehabilitation versus those who did not.
Results: Eighty-one (81) patients met the inclusion criteria. No differences were found in demographic and surgical characteristics between those who received blood flow restriction compared with those who did not. While both groups had improvements in quadriceps peak torque and limb symmetry index (LSI; defined as peak torque of the operative limb divided by the peak torque of the nonoperative limb) over the study period, the blood flow restriction group had significantly lower mean peak torque of the operative limb at first Biodex strength measurement (95.6 vs. 111.2 Nm; p = 0.03). Additionally, the blood flow restriction group had a significantly lower mean LSI than those with no blood flow restriction at the second Biodex measurement timepoint (81% vs. 90%; p = 0.02). No other significant differences were found between the strength outcomes measured.
Conclusions: Results of this study show that the 'real world' clinical implementation of blood flow restriction therapy to the postoperative rehabilitation protocol following QT autograft ACLR did not result in an increase in absolute or longitudinal changes in quadriceps strength measurements. A better understanding and standardisation of the use of blood flow restriction therapy in the rehabilitation setting is necessary to delineate the true effects of this modality on strength recovery after QT autograft ACLR.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Keywords: ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction; Biodex; blood flow restriction therapy; knee extension strength.
Year of publishing
2024
Asbtract
Background: The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is increasing, and quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft is gaining popularity for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction.
Purpose: To evaluate the differences in the patient-reported functional outcomes, concomitant injuries, and graft failure in primary versus revision ACL surgery using QT autograft.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: A total of 376 patients with primary ACL reconstruction and 138 patients with revision ACL reconstruction were retrospectively retrieved from a prospectively collected ACL registry. A minimally invasive technique was used for QT autograft harvesting. The surgical procedure and rehabilitation protocol were identical in both groups. To maintain a homogeneous cohort for the study, the groups were matched by age, sex, and preinjury outcome scores (Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level, and visual analog scale [VAS] for pain). Initial baseline assessments of outcome scores were compared with scores collected at the 2-year postoperative mark.
Results: The mean age of the primary group and revision group was 32.9 ± 10.2 years (range, 18-55 years) and 32.3 ± 9.9 years (range, 19-55 years) respectively. Significant preinjury to postoperative improvements were noted in Lysholm (88.2 ± 16.4 vs 83.5 ± 15.0; P = .007) and VAS pain (0.9 ± 1.3 vs 1.5 ± 1.6; P = .001) scores after primary ACL reconstruction compared with revision reconstruction. However, no significant difference was found in Tegner activity level (6.7 ± 1.8 vs 5.9 ± 1.8; P > .430). Primary ACL injury was associated with significantly higher concomitant medial collateral ligament injuries (P = .019), while the revision group was associated with significantly higher concomitant cartilage (P = .001) and meniscal (P = .003) injuries. A significantly higher graft failure rate was noted in the revision group compared with the primary ACL reconstruction group (13.0% vs 5.6%; P = .005).
Conclusion: Both primary and revision ACL reconstruction with QT autograft had acceptable functional outcomes. The primary group had better outcomes than the revision group, possibly due to the lower prevalence of meniscal and cartilage injuries in the primary group compared with the revision group. The revision group was associated with higher graft failure than the primary group. QT autograft is a viable graft choice for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction.
Keywords: ACL; QT autograft; anterior cruciate ligament; quadriceps graft; revision ACL.
Year of publishing
2025
Abstract
The management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries continually evolves, with new interest in all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft, as well as new interest in suture tape augmentation of the graft, particularly in high-risk patients with young age; female sex; lower-limb alignment, tibial, or femoral abnormalities; hyperlaxity; concomitant meniscal and/or additional ligamentous injuries; or participation in high-risk sports. Load-sharing suture tape enhances the biomechanical stability of the reconstructed ACL, especially during the initial ingrowth and ligamentization phase, and biomechanical evidence highlights a reduced risk of graft elongation and failure under the loads encountered during daily physical activities and sport. Optimal tape tensioning could be achieved in knee hyperextension, when the ACL is at maximal length, to avoid overconstraint. The published 2-year outcomes of this technique are excellent. Current comparative studies, however, have not shown superiority. Additional controlled studies and studies with longer-term follow-up are needed, as well as comparison to extra-articular tenodesis augmentation.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: There are various reported complications after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) necessitating additional surgery in skeletally immature patients, regardless of technique and autograft type.
Purpose: To analyze the rate and type of complications encountered with soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft (QTA) for ACLR in patients ≤18 years as well as the overall rate of second surgery, unrelated to the use of the QTA.
Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: A total of 141 patients ≤18 years who underwent ACLR with a QTA and had minimum 6-month follow-up were included. All patients underwent ACLR by utilizing a full-thickness soft tissue QTA. Complications associated with the QTA harvest site and use of QTA were reported.
Results: The mean age of the included cohort (84 men, 57 women) was 14.8 ± 1.6 years. The average follow-up was of 2.0 ± 1.2 years. A total of 30 (21%) patients had a subsequent complication that required surgical intervention; in 11 (8%) patients, the complication was specifically associated with the use of a QTA, whereas in 19 (13%) patients, the complication was related to the ACLR. In addition, 13 (9%) patients underwent a contralateral ACLR procedure. Of the QTA-related complications, 2 patients developed osteochondritis dissecans (OCD)-like lesions in the superior aspect of the patella, 2 patients had injured their quadriceps extensor mechanism and required surgical repair, and 8 patients had a subsequent procedure to remove nonabsorbable sutures used for donor site quadriceps tendon closure. One of the patients who underwent the removal of nonabsorbable sutures also had an arthroscopic debridement of patellar chondral damage.
Conclusion: We reported complications encountered with soft tissue QTA for ACLR. The complication rate for QTA harvest was 8%. However, given that the removal of nonabsorbable sutures from the donor site was caused by the surgical technique used, the revised nonsuture-related complication rate for QTA graft harvest was 2%. Although the use of a QTA has recently gained popularity due to its high return-to-sport and low graft-failure rates, surgeons should be aware of the complications associated with using this graft type.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; complication; pediatrics; quadriceps tendon autograft; return to sport.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is most commonly performed with hamstring tendon (HT) or bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts, although the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has recently increased in popularity. This systematic review and meta-analysis review compares QT and HT autografts for primary ACLR with a sole focus on randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods: A prospective protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023427339). The search included MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science until February 2024. Only comparative RCTs were included. The primary outcome was the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score. Secondary outcomes included: other validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), objective strength scores, complications, and return to sport and work.
Results: From 2,609 articles identified, seven were included (n = 474 patients). This meta-analysis did not identify a significant difference in post-operative IKDC scores (5 articles; p = 0.73), Lysholm scores (3 studies; p = 0.80) or Tegner activity scales (2 studies; p = 0.98). There were no differences in graft failure rates (4 studies; p = 0.92) or in overall adverse events (4 studies; p = 0.83) at 24 months post-ACLR as per meta-analysis. Donor site morbidity scores were significantly lower in the QT group (MD -4.67, 95% CI -9.29 to -0.05; 2 studies, 211 patients; p = 0.05, I2 = 34%).
Conclusion: There were no differences between QT and HT in PROMs, graft failure rates or overall complications based on low- to moderate-quality evidence. There may possibly be lower donor site morbidity with the QT autograft, however, the evidence is not sufficient to draw definitive conclusions.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Autograft; Hamstring tendon; Meta-analysis; Quadriceps tendon; Systematic review.
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Over the last 12 years identification of specific risk factors (age, activity level, and laxity) for failure of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have led to comparisons of the patellar tendon (PT) and hamstring (HS) tendon grafts. The PT has proved superior in most of these studies. During this same time period, there has been increased clinical/research interest in the quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction. This has led to direct comparison to the HS and QT autografts. Again, the HS tendon appears inferior in measured outcomes to the quadriceps tendon. Increased laxity measurements seem to correlate with the decreased evidence of radiographic healing on magnetic resonance imaging. If this is the case, it may indeed be the final nail in the coffin for HS graft use in young at-risk athletic populations.
Year of publishing
2024
Background: The use of quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts has increased in the past 10 years. However, there remains a dearth of large studies examining the effects of graft selection on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) that includes QT grafts.
Purpose: To evaluate the risk of subsequent surgical outcomes, including revision and reoperation, for a large cohort of patients with primary ACLR according to autograft selection.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: Data from a US health care system ACLR registry were used to conduct a cohort study. Primary isolated autograft ACLRs were identified (2012-2021). The exposure of interest was autograft type: QT, bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the risk of aseptic revision (defined as a subsequent surgery where removal and replacement of the original graft for noninfectious reasons was required) and risk of aseptic reoperation (defined as any subsequent surgery for noninfectious reasons where the graft was left intact) according to autograft selection.
Results: The study sample comprised 21,973 ACLRs performed by 290 surgeons at 53 hospitals. QT, BPTB, and HT autografts were used in 1103 (5.0%), 9519 (43.3%), and 11,351 (51.7%) ACLRs, respectively. In adjusted models, no significant differences were observed in revision risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.60-1.89; P = .837) or reoperation risk (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.70-1.43; P = .993) within 4 years of follow-up when comparing QT ACLR with BPTB ACLR. Additionally, no differences in 4-year revision (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.34-1.12; P = .111) or reoperation (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.85-1.80; P = .262) risks were observed when comparing QT ACLR with HT ACLR. HT ACLRs were noted to have a higher risk of revision (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.25-1.84; P < .001) compared with BPTB ACLRs but a lower risk of reoperation (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98; P = .024).
Conclusion: In this large multicenter study using data from an ACLR registry, the authors found no difference in the risk of revision or reoperation when QT was compared with BPTB or HT autograft with the numbers available, but they did find a 1.5 times higher risk of revision when HT autograft was compared with BPTB autograft. Surgeons may use this information when choosing the appropriate graft for ACLR in their patients.
Keywords: ACLR; BPTB; graft selection; hamstring; patellar tendon; quadriceps
Year of publishing
2024
Abstract
Background: The rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture in active, skeletally immature patients is increasing. Although hamstring tendon autograft (HTA) was previously deemed the gold standard, recent studies have shown HTA to have a high failure rate in this high-risk population of young competitive athletes, and quadriceps tendon autograft (QTA) has yielded excellent preliminary outcomes in some studies examining this population.
Purpose: To evaluate 3-year clinical and patient-reported functional outcomes of primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with soft tissue QTA in skeletally immature patients.
Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: Skeletally immature patients who underwent ACLR with a full-thickness soft tissue QTA were included. Preoperative patient and surgical data were collected. The ACLR technique was selected predicated upon skeletal age and included all-epiphyseal and complete transphyseal techniques. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years with successive clinical visits or were contacted via telephone. Patients who did not have minimum 2-year follow-up after 3 contact attempts via telephone were excluded. Information regarding return to sports (RTS) and concomitant or subsequent surgical procedures was collected. Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC), Hospital for Special Surgery Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores were collected.
Results: Of 85 adolescent patients aged 11.1 to 17.6 years (mean age, 14.1 ± 1.2 years), 2 patients were determined to be lost to follow-up after 3 failed contact attempts. Of the patients included in this study (N = 83), 26 patients (31%) underwent all-epiphyseal and 57 patients (69%) underwent complete transphyseal ACLR. Additionally, 48 patients (58%) underwent concomitant lateral extra-articular tenodesis using the iliotibial band with a modified Lemaire technique. The mean follow-up time was 3.7 ± 1.2 years (range, 2-7 years). Twenty (24%) patients had subsequent surgical procedures, of which 3 (4%) were due to graft failures. At a mean 3-year follow-up, the mean Pedi-IKDC, HSS Pedi-FABS, and SANE scores were 90, 23, and 94 respectively; the RTS rate was 100%; and the rate of RTS at the previous level of performance was 93%.
Conclusion: Use of a soft tissue QTA for ALCR in a high-risk skeletally immature population of athletes resulted in excellent postoperative outcomes with low rates of graft failure and high return to sport rates.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; knee; pediatric; quadriceps tendon autograft.
Year of publishing
2020
Abstract
Purpose: Quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft ACL reconstruction was hypothesized to possess less anterior knee laxity, pivot shift laxity, and lower failure rates than hamstring tendon (HT) autografts.
Methods: Terms "hamstring tendon autograft" and "ACL reconstruction" or "quadriceps tendon autograft" and "ACL reconstruction" were searched in Embase and PubMed. Inclusion criteria required that studies included patients treated for primary ACL injury with reconstruction using either a QT autograft (Group 1) or a HT autograft (Group 2) and instrumented anterior knee laxity assessment. Extracted information included surgical fixation method, graft type, graft thickness or diameter, single vs. double bundle surgical method, publication year, time between the index knee injury and surgery, % women, initial and final subject number, subject age, follow-up length, side-to-side anterior knee laxity difference, Lysholm Score, Subjective IKDC score, anterior knee laxity side-to-side difference grade, ipsilateral pivot shift laxity grade, and failure rate. The Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies was used to evaluate study methodological quality.
Results: The QT group (Group 1) had 17 studies and the HT group (Group 2) had 61 studies. Overall, Group 2 had greater pivot shift laxity (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.59, p = 0.005). Group 2 suspensory femoral fixation had greater pivot shift laxity (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.01-1.58, p = 0.02) than Group 1 compression femoral fixation. Group 2 compression femoral fixation also had more anterior knee laxity (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.52, p = 0.01) than Group 1 compression femoral fixation and higher failure rates based on initial (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.4, p = 0.002) and final (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.32-2.71, p = 0.0003) subject number. Failure rate for HT compression femoral fixation was greater than suspensory femoral fixation based on initial (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.52-2.84, p < 0.0001) and final (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.63-3.16, p < 0.0001) subject number.
Conclusions: Overall, QT autografts had less pivot shift laxity and lower failure rates based on final subject number than HT autografts. Compression QT autograft femoral fixation had lower pivot shift laxity than suspensory HT autograft femoral fixation. Compression QT autograft femoral fixation had less anterior knee laxity and lower failure rates than compression HT autograft femoral fixation. Suspensory HT autograft femoral fixation had lower failure rates than compression HT autograft femoral fixation. Greater knee laxity and failure rates may be related to a combination of HT autograft diameter and configuration (tissue quality and dimensions, strands, bundles, and suturing method) variability and fixation mode.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Laxity; Patient outcome; Reconstruction.
Year of publishing
2021
Abstract
Background: We developed a quadriceps-tendon graft technique using a double-layered, partial-thickness, soft tissue quadriceps tendon graft (dlQUAD) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This technique allows simple femoral loop button fixation and a limited harvest depth of the quadriceps tendon.
Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing revision ACLR using the dlQUAD technique compared with a hamstring tendon graft (HT).
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: A total of 114 patients who underwent revision ACLR between 2017 and 2018 were included in this retrospective case series. At a mean follow-up of 26.9 ± 3.7 months (range, 24-36), 89 patients (dlQUAD: n = 43, HT: n = 46) were clinically examined. In addition, patients completed the Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Postoperative failure of the revision ACLR was defined as a side-to-side difference (SSD) in Rolimeter testing ≥5 mm or a pivot-shift grade of 2 or 3.
Results: Nine patients (10.1%) were identified with a failed revision ACLR. There was a significantly lower failure rate with dlQUAD versus the HT group (2.3% vs 17.4%; P = .031). The mean postoperative SSD was significantly less in the dlQUAD group (1.3 ± 1.3 mm [range, 0-5] vs 1.8 ± 2.2 mm [range, 0-9]; P = .043). At the latest follow-up, Tegner and IKDC scores significantly improved in the dlQUAD group compared with the HT group (Tegner: 5.8 ± 1.8 vs 5.6 ± 1.5; P = .043; IKDC: 83.8 ± 12.2 vs 78.6 ± 16.8; P = .037). The pain VAS score was also significantly reduced in the dlQUAD group compared with the HT group (0.9 ± 1.1 vs 1.6 ± 2.0; P = .014).
Conclusion: The dlQUAD and HT techniques both demonstrated significant improvement of preoperative knee laxity and satisfactory patient-reported outcome measures after revision ACLR. Compared with the HT grafts, the dlQUAD technique showed lower failure rates and small increases in Tegner and IKDC scores.
Keywords: quadriceps tendon graft; revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; soft tissue.
© The Author(s) 2021.
Year of publishing
2019
Abstract
Background: The objective of the study was to compare the results of a primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using the press-fit fixation technique for a quadriceps tendon (QT) graft to a standard quadrupled hamstring (HT) graft with interference screw fixation.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study with a 12-month follow up provided data for 92 patients. Exclusion criteria were accompanying ligament injuries and contralateral ACL injury. Patients who suffered a graft failure, which was defined as a side-to-side difference of > 3 mm, or infection were rated 'D' according to the IKDC and excluded from further evaluation. Forty-six patients underwent primary ACLR using the press-fit fixation technique for autologous bone QT graft. These patients were matched in terms of age, gender, accompanying meniscus tear and cartilage injury to 46 patients who underwent standard HT graft with interference screw fixation. Patients were evaluated according to the Lachman test, Pivot-Shift test, IKDC score, Tegner score, Rolimeter measurements, one-leg hop test, thigh circumference and donor side morbidity.
Results: No significant differences in Tegner score (p = 0.9), subjective or objective IKDC score (p = 0.9;p = 0.6), knee stability (Lachman Test p = 0.6; Pivot-Shift Test p = 0.4; Side-to-Side Difference p = 0.4), functioning testing (One-Leg Hop Test p = 0.6; Thigh Circumference p = 0.4) or donor side morbidity (p = 0.4) were observed at the follow up. The Lachman test was negative for 85% of the QT group and 83% of the HT group. The Pivot Shift Test was negative for 80% of the QT group and 85% of the HT group. The mean side-to-side difference was 1.6 ± 0 .2mm in both groups. The one-leg hop test revealed a collateral-side jumping distance of 96.2 ± 8.5% for the QT group and 95.5 ± 8.5% for the HT group. The thigh circumference of the injured leg was 98.3 ± 3.0% on the uninjured side in the QT group and 99.7 ± 3.0% in the HT group. A knee walking test resulted in no discomfort for 90% of the QT group and 85% of the HT group. The graft failure rate was 7.3% in the QT group and 9.8% in the HT group.
Conclusion: QT grafts fixated using the press-fit technique are a reliable alternative for primary ACL surgery.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Press-fit fixation; Quadriceps tendon.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Case: A healthy adolescent male patient initially presented with complete rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) after a plant-twist injury during a high school football game. Four weeks after ACL reconstruction with autograft bone-patella tendon-bone, the patient slipped and fell, sustaining hyperflexion of the knee, resulting in rupture of the ipsilateral quadriceps tendon.
Conclusion: Although this rare complication has previously been reported in the adult population, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first known report of an adolescent patient sustaining a quadriceps tendon rupture after ACL reconstruction.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Recently there has been growing interest in the quadriceps tendon (QUAD) as a valid option for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACLR). The aims of the study is to compare the outcomes achieved in anatomic ACLR involving QUAD vs. Hamstring (HT) autografts. A total of 52 consecutive patients underwent an ACLR, 25 patients with QUAD graft and 27 with HT graft. The same surgical technique, fixation method and postoperative protocol were used in both groups. The following parameters were evaluated: functional status (Lysholm, Tegner, subjective IKDC scores), joint stability (Lachman and pivot shift tests), surgical reoperation rate, complications, degree of satisfaction and return to previous level of activity. Descriptive statistics were analysed using the Student's t-test. Forty four patients were evaluated (20 QUAD, 24 HT), with a mean follow-up of 27.4 months. Two patients were re-operated in the QUAD group (including one ACL revision), and one patient in the HT group required an ACL revision. There were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative scores: Lysholm (96.05 vs. 96.05), IKDC (86.2 vs. 91.2) and Tegner (6 vs. 5) scales. The percentage of negative Lachman and pivot shift tests was similar in the two groups (45% vs. 50% and 40% vs. 45.8%, respectively). There were no significant differences between the groups in the degree of satisfaction (95.8% vs. 80%, p = .16) or in the percentage who returned to their previous level of activity (62.5% vs. 45%, p = .17). The use of a QUAD graft in ACL reconstruction leads to similar clinical and functional outcomes to those obtained with HT.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Purpose: Effects of suture preparation on graft contamination remain unknown in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of allograft contamination at different time points of graft preparation and investigate differences in contamination between different sites of the allografts.
Methods: Fourteen hamstring tendon (HT), 9 quadriceps tendon (QT), and 9 bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) allografts were harvested, sterilised, and stored following routine procedures. Graft suture preparation was performed with baseball stitching for soft tissue and bone drilling for bone plug. The time was recorded simultaneously. The graft was kept moist in a standard operating room environment for 30 min after the initiation of preparation. The specimens were obtained from the middle and both ends of each graft for culture at three different time points: pre-suturing, post-suturing, and 30 min after the initiation of preparation. A total of 192 specimens were transferred to the microbiology laboratory for culture, identification, and semi-quantitative assessment. Culture results were classified as negative, poor, and abundant based on the extent of growth. Contamination level was recorded as low or high corresponding to culture results of poor or abundant.
Results: The duration of suture preparation was 348, 301, and 246 s for HT, QT, and BTB (P = 0.090). The specimens had a positive culture rate of 41/192 (21.4%), of which 21 were from the ends and 20 from the middle. More positive samples with abundant bacterial growth were detected from the ends than from the middles post-suturing (7/8 vs. 1/7, P = 0.010) and at 30 min (6/11 vs. 0/11, P = 0.012). The total graft contamination rate was significantly higher at 30 min (19/32, 59.4%) than pre-suturing (4/32, 15.6%) and post-suturing (9/32, 28.1%) (P < 0.001). The contamination rate with abundant bacterial growth was higher post-suturing (7/32, 21.9%) than pre-suturing (0%). No statistically significant differences were found among the three types of allografts.
Conclusion: The contamination rate increases significantly at 30 min compared with pre-suturing and post-suturing. Suture preparation may have introduced the high-level contamination, to which the ends of the graft were more prone than the middle. Therefore, routine prophylactic decontamination after suture preparation should be considered, especially for the ends of the grafts.
Keywords: Allograft; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Contamination; Suture preparation.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Background: Although the infection rates for bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (BTB), hamstring tendon autograft (HT), and allograft have been reported previously, there are limited data available for a large cohort of individuals undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using quadriceps tendon autograft (QT).
Purpose: The aims of this study are (1) to compare rates of septic arthritis after primary and revision ACLR with QT, BTB, HT, and allograft and (2) to evaluate the association between an infection after ACLR and potential risk factors in a large single-system analysis.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: All ACLR cases performed by 10 high-volume sports medicine fellowship-trained ACL surgeons between January 2000 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Minimum follow-up was 90 days after ACLR, and all multiligament reconstructions were excluded. Demographic information, surgical variables, infection characteristics, and rate of ACL graft retention were collected for all included patients. Independent samples t test, chi-square test, or Fisher exact tests with adjusted Benjamini-Hochberg post hoc procedure were used for group comparisons.
Results: In total, 6652 patients were included in this study. The most commonly used graft was allograft (n = 2491; 37.4%), followed by HT (n = 1743; 26.2%), BTB (n = 1478; 22.2%), and QT (n = 940; 14.1%). The overall postoperative rate of septic arthritis was 0.34% (n = 23). Septic arthritis rates based on graft type were 0.74% (n = 13) for HT, 0.24% (n = 6) for allograft, 0.20% (n = 3) for BTB, and 0.10% (n = 1) for QT. While a statistically significant difference with regard to graft type (P= .01) was observed, no significant relationships were found between postoperative septic arthritis and age, sex, revision ACLR, ACLR surgical technique, and accompanying intra-articular procedures for all septic arthritis patients (P > .05). The average time from the onset of the symptoms of infection to surgical irrigation and debridement (I&D) was 2 days (minimum, 0; maximum, 6). ACL grafts were retained during I&D procedures in all patients with postoperative septic arthritis.
Conclusion: The postoperative rate of septic arthritis was 0.1% after use of the QT autograft. While graft choice may affect rates of septic arthritis after ACLR, patient characteristics, ACLR technique, revision ACLR, and accompanying intra-articular procedures during ACLR were not associated with postoperative septic arthritis with the numbers available for analysis.
Keywords: ACLR; graft; infection; quadriceps tendon; septic arthritis.
Year of publishing
2020
Abstract
Purpose: To determine and compare the incidence of post-operative septic arthritis following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (R-ACLR) with autologous quadriceps tendon (with patellar bone block) compared to autologous hamstring tendons (semitendinosus and gracilis).
Methods: A total of 1638 isolated R-ACLR with either autologous hamstring tendons (n = 1004, 61.3%) or quadriceps tendon (n = 634; 38.7%) were performed between 2004 and 2017 and were retrospectively analysed with regard to the occurrence of post-operative septic arthritis. The technique of R-ACLR did not significantly change during the years of the study. All patients received pre-op i.v.antibiotics, but no presoaking of the grafts in vancomycin was performed in the years of the study. The individual decision of graft choice was based on graft availability, tunnel position and the presence of tunnel widening. Generally, hamstring tendons were preferred. There were no clinically relevant differences between the groups regarding gender or age. Routine follow-up examination was performed 6 weeks after the index operation (follow-up rate 96.5%), and patients unsuspicious for septic arthritis at that time were classified as non-infected.
Results: Fourteen patients with septic arthritis were identified, resulting in an overall incidence of 0.85%. There was one patient with septic arthritis in the quadriceps tendon group (incidence: 0.16%) and 13 patients in the hamstring tendons group (incidence: 1.29%), respectively. The difference was significant (p = 0.013).
Conclusion: In this series, the incidence of post-operative septic arthritis after R-ACLR was lower when quadriceps tendon graft was used compared to hamstring tendon grafts.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: ACL; Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Complication; Graft; Hamstrings; Infection; Quadriceps; Revision; Septic arthritis; Tendon.
Year of publishing
2021
Abstract
The quadriceps tendon is gaining preference as an autograft over conventional grafts for the primary reconstruction of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments and of the medial patello-femoral ligament. In the past, the use of the quadriceps tendon was associated with considerable morbidity and less favourable outcomes compared to other grafts, specifically due to post-operative weakness of the quadriceps and other complications such as patellar fracture and rupture of the extensor apparatus. These problems are partially ascribable to the graft harvesting method used (large incision, bone block>2cm, and full-thickness tendon harvesting). Recent technical advancements have made reproducible harvesting of quadriceps grafts possible, thereby largely preventing the complications. In this study we describe an original quadriceps tendon harvesting technique in which a minimally invasive approach allows the collection of a sufficiently long graft, while sparing the deep layer of the quadriceps tendon. This technique decreases intra-operative morbidity and improves the post-operative outcomes.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Minimally invasive surgery; Quadriceps tendon.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
1997
Abstract
We present a retrospective study of 24 patients with chronic injury of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) treated by arthroscopically assisted reconstruction with bone-tendon-bone patellar autograft. At a mean follow-up of 26.5 months (range 24-53 months) the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation form, Lysholm and Tegner rating systems were used to evaluate symptoms, functional limitations during sports and daily activities, and changes in activity level. At the final IKDC evaluation we found 6 patients (25%) with grade A (normal), 13 patients (54.2%) with grade B (nearly normal), 3 patients (12.5%) with grade C (abnormal) and 2 patients (8.3%) with grade D (severely abnormal). The average side-to-side difference, as measured by the KT-2000 arthrometer, was 8.38 (+/-1.95) preoperatively and 4.08 (+/-2.09) mm postoperatively at 89 N with the knee flexed at a neutral quadriceps knee angle of approximately 70 degrees. The worst results significantly correlated with the time elapsed from injury to surgery (P < 0.001). The preoperative Lysholm score was 56+/-12 (range 41-79) and at follow-up 94+/-8 (range 76-100). The Tegner activity score improved for all patients after surgical treatment. Average preinjury score was 7.4 (range 4-9), decreasing to 3.40 (range 2-7) preoperatively and increasing to 5.4 (range 4-9) postoperatively. At follow-up, 12 patients (50%) regained to their preinjury scores after surgery. Our study suggests that this arthroscopic technique, which allows a more precise placement of tunnels, can improve the results of the PCL reconstruction with a bone-tendon-bone autograft.
Year of publishing
2020
Abstract
Background: To demonstrate and compare results obtained with the transtibial double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction technique using two types of autografts in isolated and combined PCL lesions.
Methods: Fifty-two patients with isolated or combined PCL injuries underwent double-bundle PCL reconstruction and were retrospectively evaluated. Among them, 34 were reconstructed using ipsilateral quadriceps and semitendinosus tendon grafts, and 18 were reconstructed using bilateral hamstring tendon grafts. The criteria for outcome evaluation were: objective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, posterior stability (posterior drawer test and KT-1000TM), and rate of complications, comparing the two types of grafts and comparing isolated PCL and combined lesions. The minimum follow-up was two years.
Results: Significant improvements were found in all evaluation methods between the pre- and postoperative periods (all P < .05), with no observed differences between the graft type that was used (all P > .05). The whole sample had the following results: objective IKDC score, 96.2% classified as A/B; Lysholm score, 98.1% rated as good or excellent; and KT-1000, 98.1% with a side-to-side difference of up to five millimeters (65.4% with 0 to two millimeters). The complication rate was 9.6%, with no differences between the graft type that was used (P = .585). No significant difference was observed when comparing the results between isolated PCL injuries and combined injuries (all P > .05).
Conclusions: The proposed PCL reconstruction technique presented satisfactory results in both isolated and combined PCL lesions, and there were no differences between different types of autografts used.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Year of publishing
2021
Abstract
Background: Hamstring tendon autograft (HTA) is a common graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) in skeletally immature patients. Recently, the use of quadriceps tendon autograft (QTA) has shown superior preliminary outcomes in this population.
Purpose: To evaluate graft maturity by comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity of HTA versus QTA used in primary ACLR.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: All patients under the age of 18 years who underwent a primary ACLR by the senior authors using either an HTA or a QTA were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 70 skeletally immature patients (37 in the HTA group and 33 in the QTA group) with an available MRI at 6 and 12 months postoperatively were included. Signal intensity ratio (SIR) was measured on sagittal MRI by averaging the signal at 3 regions of interest along the ACL graft and dividing by the signal of the tibial footprint of the posterior cruciate ligament. Statistical analysis was performed to determine interrater reliability and differences between time points and groups.
Results: Age, sex, and type of surgery were not associated with any differences in SIR. There was no significant difference in SIR between groups on the 6-month MRI. However, the SIR of the QTA group was significantly less than in the HTA group on the 12-month MRI (2.33 vs 2.72, respectively; P = .028). Within the HTA group, there was no significant difference in SIR at either MRI time point. In the QTA group, there was a significant decrease in SIR between the 6-month and 12-month postoperative MRI (2.70 vs 2.33, respectively; P = .045).
Conclusion: These findings suggest improved graft maturation, remodeling, and structural integrity of the QTA compared with the HTA between 6 and 12 months postoperatively. This provides evidence that, at 1 year postoperatively, QTA may have a superior rate of incorporation and synovialization as compared with the HTA.
Keywords: MRI; adolescents; anterior cruciate ligaement; quadriceps tendon autograft; semitendinosus tendon; signal intensity.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Quadriceps tendon (QT) graft is a versatile graft for anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Advantages of quadriceps tendon autograft are the superior quality of graft, customization of graft size, reduced anterior knee pain, reduced risk of neurovascular injury, reduced incidence of arthrofibrosis compared to BPTB graft, preservation of ACL agonists, i.e., hamstrings, implantation of thicker graft and better patella mobility. Considering its advantages over other available autografts, its popularity is now increasing among surgeons. Conventionally, quadriceps tendon graft is harvested by an open technique, which produces an ugly scar and delays rehabilitation. In this article, we describe a minimally invasive technique of quadriceps tendon graft harvesting with a 2-2.5-cm vertical skin incision. Our technique does not require any specialized instrumentation, unlike other reported minimally invasive QT graft harvesting techniques, as we harvest the graft with a close tendon stripper.
Year of publishing
2022
No Abstract available
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Purpose: To determine factors associated with localized anterior arthrofibrosis (cyclops lesion), such as graft size, warranting early reoperation for lysis of adhesions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (ASTQT) autograft.
Methods: All primary ASTQT autograft ACLRs within a single surgeon's prospectively collected registry with minimum 6-month follow-up were included. Patients who underwent multiligament knee reconstruction or cartilage restoration procedures were excluded. Localized anterior arthrofibrosis was defined as the requirement for a second procedure to achieve debridement and lysis of adhesions owing to the inability to regain terminal extension within 6 months of ACLR. The sex-specific incidence of arthrofibrosis was evaluated relative to age, weight, femoral and tibial tunnel sizes, meniscal repair, and meniscectomy by a binary logistic regression.
Results: This study included 721 patients (46% female patients). There were 52 cases of localized anterior arthrofibrosis (7.2%). Female patients had a greater incidence of arthrofibrosis than male patients. Male patients with a femoral tunnel diameter of 9.25 mm or greater had an increased incidence of arthrofibrosis compared with those with a diameter of less than 9.25 mm, whereas a similar cutoff was not found to be statistically significant for female patients. Concomitant meniscal repair was associated with an increased risk of arthrofibrosis.
Conclusions: Female sex and concomitant meniscal repair were associated with an increased localized anterior arthrofibrosis incidence. Furthermore, ASTQT with a femoral tunnel diameter of 9.25 mm or greater in male patients was associated with an increased incidence of arthrofibrosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective, comparative prognostic trial.
Copyright © 2022 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Purpose: To contribute to future quadriceps tendon harvest and fixation guidelines in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by comparing 2-year patient-reported subjective knee outcome scores and incidence of graft-related complications between the shorter harvest all-inside tibial-femoral suspensory fixation (TFSF) approach versus the longer harvest standard tibial interference screw fixation technique.
Methods: Patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with all soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft from January 2017 to May 2019 were identified for inclusion. Patients were matched into 2 cohorts of 62 based on reconstruction technique. All patients completed baseline and minimum 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner Activity Level, and Lysholm questionnaires and were queried regarding subsequent procedures and complications to the operative knee.
Results: Average graft length for the all-inside TFSF was 69.55 (95% confidence interval 68.99-70.19) mm versus 79.27 (95% confidence interval 77.21-81.34) mm in the tibial screw fixation cohort (P = .00001). Two-year Lysholm scores were greater in the TFSF cohort (P = .04) but were not clinically significant. There was no difference in 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee (P = .09) or Tegner (P = .69) scores between cohorts, but more patients in the TFSF cohort returned to or exceeded their baseline activity level compared with the tibial screw fixation cohort (73% vs 61%, P = .25). Seven patients in the TFSF cohort versus 13 in the tibial screw fixation cohort reported anterior knee pain or kneeling difficulty (P = .22). There were no differences in reported complications.
Conclusions: All-inside soft-tissue quadriceps tendon autograft with TFSF resulted in clinically comparable subjective outcome scores at 2 years to tibial screw fixation. There were also no differences in complications or reports of anterior knee pain or kneeling difficulty. All-inside TFSF can be a viable alternative to tibial screw fixation for all-soft tissue quadriceps autograft.
Level of evidence: III, comparative therapeutic trial.
Copyright © 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
Year of publishing
2023
Purpose: Although the outcomes of ACL reconstruction are generally satisfying, there are several patients who do not regain their pre-injury sporting level and suffer persistent symptoms. Orthopaedic practice has evolved significantly over the last five years to address these drawbacks. The aim of the present survey was to analyze the changes in the approach to ACL reconstruction among a population of young ESSKA surgeons dedicated to ACL surgery.
Methods: The survey was uploaded on the ESSKA website and was accessible to members under the age of 45. The ESSKA society has 1035 U45 members involved in multiple aspects of Orthopaedic practice. One hundred and forty questionnaires were returned. Several aspects of ACL surgery were investigated at baseline and 5 years prior. They included general details such as the volume of ACL reconstructions per surgeon per year, the graft choice in cases of low and high demanding patients, the technique for femoral tunnel drilling and the preferred device for femoral fixation. The approach to the management of damage to peripheral structures, as well as meniscal ramp and root tears were also investigated.
Results: Hamstrings and quadrupled semitendinosus were the preferred graft choice in low-demanding patients (92.9%) while quadriceps tendon is gaining popularity in contact sport practitioners (from 4.3 to 10.7%). The percentage of surgeons using femoral screws had decreased from 37.9 to 29.3 while the percentage of those who used buttons increased from 52.9 to 69.3%. Extra-articular procedures (antero-lateral ligament (ALL) or lateral tenodesis have become popular. The percentage of surgeons who perform an additional peripheral reconstruction rose from 28.5 to 71.5%. Of those who perform the meniscal repair more than 50% of patients rose from 14.3 to 27.9%. Similarly, the percentage of surgeons who performed a medial meniscus ramp lesion repair rose from 29.4 to 54.7%. While the percentage of those who choose to perform a transtibial pull-out repair of lateral meniscus root tears significantly rose from 17.9 to 59.3%.
Conclusions: The present survey among under 45 years old ESSKA surgeons yields some notable findings. The new evidence on the impact of injuries on peripheral structures and menisci is stimulating surgeons towards a more anatomic approach if identified at the time of ACL reconstruction. This evidence will probably influence future research and decision-making.
Level of evidence: IV.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Fixation device; Graft choice; Ramp lesion; Root lesion.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament rupture represents a career-threatening injury for professional soccer players.
Purpose: To analyze the pattern of injury, return to play (RTP), and performance of a consecutive series of elite professional soccer players after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: We evaluated the medical records of 40 consecutive elite soccer players who underwent ACLR by a single surgeon between September 2018 and May 2022. Patient age, height, weight, body mass index, position, injury history, affected side, RTP time, minutes played per season (MPS), and MPS as a percentage of playable minutes before and after ACLR were retrieved from medical records and from publicly available media-based platforms.
Results: Included were 27 male patients (mean ± SD age at surgery, 23.2 ± 4.3 years; range, 18-34 years). The injury occurred during matches in 24 players (88.9%), with a noncontact mechanism in 22 (91.7%). Meniscal pathology was found in 21 patients (77.8%). Lateral meniscectomy and meniscal repair were performed in 2 (7.4%) and 14 (51.9%) patients, respectively, and medial meniscectomy and meniscal repair were performed in 3 (11.1%) and 13 (48.1%) patients, respectively. A total of 17 players (63.0%) underwent ACLR with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and 10 (37.0%) with soft tissue quadriceps tendon. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis was added in 5 patients (18.5%). The overall RTP rate was 92.6% (25 of 27). Two athletes moved to a lower league after surgery. The mean MPS% during the last preinjury season was 56.69% ± 21.71%; this decreased significantly to 29.18% ± 20.6% (P < .001) in the first postoperative season and then increased to 57.76% ± 22.89% and 55.89% ± 25.8% in the second and third postoperative seasons. Two (7.4%) reruptures and 2 (7.4%) failed meniscal repairs were reported.
Conclusion: ACLR in elite UEFA soccer players was associated with a 92.6% rate of RTP and 7.4% rate of reinjury within 6 months after primary surgery. Moreover, 7.4% of soccer players moved to a lower league during the first season after surgery. Age, graft selection, concomitant treatments, and lateral extra-articular tenodesis were not significantly associated with prolonged RTP.
Keywords: ACL injury; ACL reconstruction; LET; associated injuries; elite athletes; return to play; soccer.
© The Author(s) 2023.
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes, graft failure, quadriceps rupture and sports preference after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in patients older than 50 years who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft.
Methods: Between 2010 and 2020, prospectively collected data were obtained from an institutional database. Patients older than 50 years with primary arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were included. Patients undergoing a revision ACL reconstruction or undergoing a primary ACL reconstruction using a graft other than a QT autograft, and patients with a contralateral knee injury or osteoarthritis (Ahlbäck stage 2 or higher) were excluded. A minimally invasive technique was used for QT autograft harvesting. Patients were evaluated for pre-injury and 2-year follow-up Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, graft failure, quadriceps tendon rupture, and return to sport.
Results: A total of 57 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the cohort was 54.9 ± 5.2 (range 50-75). Of the 57 reconstructions, 16 (28%) were isolated ACL reconstructions, while 41 (72%) were complex reconstructions (concomitant meniscus, cartilage and/or collateral ligament injuries). At the 2-year follow-up Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level and VAS for pain improved to pre-injury level and no significant difference was noted between pre-injury and 2-year follow-up functional scores (n.s.). No case of graft failure or quadriceps tendon rupture was reported. No significant difference was noted in the pre-injury and postoperative sports preference (n.s.) and all patients return to their desired sports activity.
Conclusion: Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction by using QT autograft in highly active older patients provides satisfactory patient-reported functional outcomes and allows recovery of the pre-injury level of activity. QT autograft is a good graft option in patients older than 50 years.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Keywords: ACL; Anterior cruciate ligament; Functional outcome; Over 50 years; Quadriceps Graft.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Background: Numerous individual, temporal, injury- and surgery-specific factors impact the functional capacity during rehabilitation, return to sports (RTS), and re-injury prevention after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Purpose: This multicentre cohort study evaluated the isolated and interactive contributions of time between injury and surgery, time since reconstruction, age, gender, pain, graft type, and concomitant injuries as to inertial sensor-assessed motor function after ACL reconstructions in multiple linear mixed model regressions.
Methods: Anonymized data were retrieved from a nationwide German registry. In this cohort study, patients with an acute unilateral ACL rupture, with or without concomitant ipsilateral knee injuries, and having passed an arthroscopically assisted anatomic reconstruction were included. Potential predictors were age [years], gender/sex, time since reconstruction [days], time between injury and reconstruction [days], concomitant intra-articular injuries (isolated ACL tear, meniscal tear, lateral ligament, unhappy triad), graft type (hamstrings, patellar, or quadriceps tendon autograft), and pain during each measurement (visual analogue scale 0-10 cm). Repeated inertial motion unit-assessments of a comprehensive battery of classic functional RTS test were performed in the course of the rehabilitation and return to sports: Joint position sense/kinesthesia (Angle reproduction error [degrees]), Dynamic Balance Composite score [cm] of the Y-Balance test), drop jumps (Knee displacement [cm]), Vertical hop (Hopping height [mm]), Speedy jumps (Duration [seconds]), Side hops (Number of hops [n]), single leg hop for distance (hopping distance [cm]). Repeated measures multiple linear mixed models investigated the impact and nesting interaction of the potential predictors on the functional outcomes.
Results: Data from 1441 persons (mean age 29.4, SD 11.8 years; 592 female, 849 male) were included. Most had an isolated ACL rupture: n = 938 (65.1%). Minor shares showed lateral ligament involvement: n = 70 (4.9%), meniscal tear: n = 414 (28.7%), or even unhappy triad: n = 15 (1%). Several predictors such as time between injury and reconstruction, time since reconstruction (estimates for ndays ranged from + .05 (i.e., an increase of the hopping distance of 0.05 cm per day since reconstruction occurs) for single leg hop for distance to + 0.17 for vertical hopping height; p < 0.001), age, gender, pain, graft type (patellar tendon graft: estimates between + 0.21 for Y-balance and + 0.48 for vertical hop performance; p < 0.001), and concomitant injuries contribute to the individual courses of functional abilities of the reconstructed side after ACL reconstruction. The unimpaired side was mostly influenced by sex, age, the time between injury and reconstruction (estimates between - 0.0033 (side hops) and + 0.10 (vertical hopping height), p < 0.001)), and time since reconstruction.
Conclusions: Time since reconstruction, time between injury and reconstruction, age, gender, pain, graft type, and concomitant injuries are not independent but nested interrelating predictors of functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. It might not be enough to assess them isolated; the knowledge on their interactive contribution to motor function is helpful for the management of the reconstruction (earlier reconstructions should be preferred) deficit-oriented function-based rehabilitation (time- and function based rehabilitation instead of solely a time- or function based approach) and individualized return to sports strategies.
Keywords: Functional test; Graft type; Re-injury; Rehabilitation; Return to play; Return to sport.
© 2023. The Author(s)
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a comprehensive complications profile for quadriceps tendon-autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (QT ACL-R).
Methods: A traditional and grey literature search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, and many grey literature sources were searched from inception to May 29, 2022. All studies were searched and screened in duplicate with included studies being of all levels of evidence, reporting complications, and with patients of all ages undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft in the last 15 years. Studies were excluded if they had cadaveric or animal subjects or were reviews. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using MINORS criteria for non-randomised studies and Cochrane's RoB 2.0 for randomised studies. Data were summarised with weighted event rates generated under a random-effects model.
Results: A total of 55 studies (5315 reconstructions) were included: 32 used quadriceps tendon with bone block (B-QT), 19 used all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (S-QT), and four did not report the QT graft subtype used. Included patients had an age range of 6.2-58 years and an average reported follow-up time of 28.1 months (range, 6-90 months) for non-randomised studies and 34.3 months (range, 0.233-120 months) for randomised studies. Pooled incidence rates for clinically relevant major complications included contralateral ACL injury at 6.0%, postoperative meniscal issues at 5.4%, cyclops lesions at 4.8%, graft failure at 4.1%, patellar fracture at 2.2%, hardware removal at 1.7%, infection at 1.5%, and donor-site quadriceps tendon rupture at 0.7%. Pooled incidence rates for clinically relevant minor complications included anterior knee pain at 9.7%, kneeling pain at 9.5%, sensation deficits at 4.4%, loss of extension at 4.2%, donor-site tendinopathy at 3.9%, cosmetic issues at 1.8%, and hematoma at 1.5%.
Conclusions: QT ACL-R resembles other graft types in its rates and types of postoperative complications. In this exploratory systematic review, no complications of QT ACL-R were found to be disproportionately represented in the literature. This graft type should remain an option with comparable complication rates to other graft choices.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Registration: This study was preregistered under PROSPERO with preregistration code CRD42022302078.
Keywords: ACL; Complications; Quadriceps tendon; Reconstruction.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the influence of surgeon-related factors and clinic routines on autograft choice in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
Methods: Data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry (SNKLR), 2008-2019, were used to study autograft choice (hamstring; HT, patellar; PT, or quadriceps tendon; QT) in primary ACLR. Patient/injury characteristics (sex, age at surgery, activity at time of injury and associated injuries) and surgeon-/clinic-related factors (operating volume, caseload and graft type use) were analyzed. Surgeon/clinic volume was divided into tertiles (low-, mid- and high-volume categories). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess variables influencing autograft choice in 2015-2019, presented as the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: 39,964 primary ACLRs performed by 299 knee surgeons in 91 clinics were included. Most patients received HT (93.7%), followed by PT (4.2%) and QT (2.1%) grafts. Patients were mostly operated on by high-volume (> 28 ACLRs/year) surgeons (68.1%), surgeons with a caseload of ≥ 50 ACLRs (85.1%) and surgeons with the ability to use ≥ two autograft types (85.9%) (all p < 0.001). Most patients underwent ACLR at high-volume (> 55 ACLRs/year) clinics (72.2%) and at clinics capable of using ≥ two autograft types (93.1%) (both p < 0.001). Significantly increased odds of receiving PT/QT autografts were found for ACLR by surgeons with a caseload of ≥ 50 ACLRs (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.11-1.79), but also for injury during handball (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.02-1.67), various other pivoting sports (basketball, hockey, rugby and American football) (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.24-2.03) and a concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury (OR 4.93, 95% CI 4.18-5.80). In contrast, female sex (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.97), injury during floorball (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.91) and ACLR by mid-volume relative to high-volume surgeons (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53-0.73) had significantly reduced odds of receiving PT/QT autografts.
Conclusion: An HT autograft was used in the vast majority of cases, but PT/QT autografts were used more frequently by experienced surgeons. Prior research has demonstrated significant differences in autograft characteristics. For this reason, patients might benefit if surgery is performed by more experienced surgeons.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Keywords: Caseload; Concomitant injuries; Hamstring; Knee; Ligament reconstruction; Operating volume; Patellar; Quadriceps; Surgical technique.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Postoperative patient satisfaction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is influenced mainly by the degree of pain, the need for reoperation, and functional performance in daily activities and sports. Graft choice has shown to have an influence on postoperative outcomes after ACL-R. While patient reported outcomes measurements do not differ between graft options, evidence shows that normal knee kinematics is not fully restored after ACL-R with an increase in postoperative anterior tibial translation (ATT). Postoperative graft rupture rates seem to favor bone-patella-tendon-bone (BPTB) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts over HT or allografts. While return to sports rates seem comparable between different graft types, postoperative extensor strength is reduced in patients with BPTB and QT whereas flexion strength is weakened in patients with HT. Postoperative donor site morbidity is highest in BPTB but comparable between HT and QT. With all graft options having advantages and drawbacks, graft choice must be individualized and chosen in accordance with the patient.
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is critical, as it remains one of the most easily adjustable factors affecting graft rupture and reoperation rates. Commonly used autografts, including hamstring tendon, quadriceps tendon and bone-patellar-tendon-bone, are reported to be biomechanically equivalent or superior compared to the native ACL. Despite this, such grafts are unable to perfectly replicate the complex anatomical and histological characteristics of the native ACL. While there remains inconclusive evidence as to the superiority of one autograft in terms of graft incorporation and maturity, allografts appear to demonstrate slower incorporation and maturity compared to autografts. Graft fixation also affects graft properties and subsequent outcomes, with each technique having unique advantages and disadvantages that should be carefully considered during graft selection.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Background: The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) in children and adolescents has increased significantly, and many such patients are at increased risk for ACL retear. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) may be performed in conjunction with ACLR to reduce the risk of ACL retear.
Purpose: To evaluate the 2-year clinical outcomes of ACLR with soft tissue quadriceps tendon (QUAD) autograft performed with a concomitant LET using a modified Lemaire technique in skeletally immature patients.
Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: A consecutive series of adolescent patients who underwent QUAD autograft ACLR and LET with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up data were analyzed retrospectively. ACLR techniques, including all-epiphyseal and complete transphyseal, were indicated based on skeletal age. Outcome measures included return to sports, concomitant or subsequent surgical procedures, and multiple patient-reported outcome measures, including Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC), and Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS) scores.
Results: The final cohort included 49 consecutive adolescent patients aged 11 to 16 years (mean, 14.2 ± 1 years) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. One patient was lost to follow-up. Of the patients included in the study (N = 48; 27 male, 21 female), 98% participated in high-risk competitive sports. Two (4%) patients were undergoing revision ACLR. Thirty-eight (79%) patients underwent complete transphyseal, and 10 (21%) patients underwent all-epiphyseal ACLR. Sixteen (33%) patients had subsequent surgical procedures, including 5 contralateral ACLR, 4 meniscal surgery, 4 QUAD autograft scar revision, 4 irrigation and debridement (2 patients, 2 each), and 3 hardware removal (2 for hemi-epiphysiodesis and 1 tibial socket button removal) procedures. The rate of graft rupture was 0%. At a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 1.2 years (range, 2-7 range), the mean SANE score was 93, the mean Pedi-IKDC score was 89, and the mean HSS Pedi-FABS score was 23. The return-to-sports rate was 100%.
Conclusion: An LET performed concomitantly with an ACLR is safe and should be considered as a concomitant procedure for adolescent patients with nonmodifiable risk factors who are at high risk of retear.
Keywords: ACL; knee ligament; lateral extra-articular tenodesis; pediatric sports medicine; return to sports.
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the functional and graft survivorship outcomes of the three most common autograft options for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR)-hamstring tendon (HT), bone-patella-tendon-bone (BPTB), and quadriceps tendon (QT).
Methods: Patients captured by the New Zealand ACL registry who underwent a primary ACLR from 2014 to 2020 were considered for the study. Patients with associated knee injury (including meniscus, chondral, osseous, and additional ligamentous injury) and previous knee surgery were excluded. Comparison was made between HT, BPTB, and QT autografts with respect to Marx and KOOS (Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) scores at minimum 2 years follow-up. In addition, graft survivorship was evaluated by comparing all-cause revision per 100 graft years and revision-free proportion at 2 years post-surgery.
Results: 2,582 patients (1,921 HT, 558 BPTB, 107 QT) were included in the study. Differences in adjusted functional outcomes between HT and BPTB were found at 12 months (mean Marx; HT 6.2; BPTB 7.1; P < 0.001) (mean KOOS Sport and Recreation; HT 75.1; BPTB 70.5; n.s.) and 24 months (mean KOOS Sports and Recreation; HT 79.2; BPTB 73.9; P < 0.001). QT was comparable to HT and BPTB in all functional scores at 12 months and 2 years. No statistically significant differences were found in revision rate between all three autograft groups up to 2 years post-surgery (revision rate per 100 graft years; HT 1.05; BPTB 0.80; QT 1.68; n.s. HT vs. BPTB; n.s. HT vs. QT; n.s. QT vs. BPTB).
Conclusions: QT was found to be comparable to both HT and BPTB in all functional scores and revision rates up to 2 years post-surgery.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Autograft; Bone-patella-tendon-bone; Functional outcomes; Hamstring tendon; KOOS; Knee osteoarthritis outcome score; Marx scores; Quadriceps tendon; Revision; Survivorship.
© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to synthesize and quantitatively assess the outcomes of ACL Revision using a quadriceps tendon (QT) graft and to compare them with those of ACL Revisions performed with hamstring tendons (HT) graft.
Methods: A comprehensive search based on the PRISMA protocol was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception until February 2022. Clinical studies reporting the outcomes of ACL Revision with QT autograft were included. Subjective and Objective IKDC, Tegner activity level, Lysholm knee score, KOOS score, VAS for pain, knee laxity (KT-1000/2000 arthrometer, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test), and graft failure were assessed. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed and a quality assessment of the included studies was carried out with the MINORS score.
Results: Seven studies met the selection criteria and were included in the systematic review for the qualitative synthesis of data. A pooled mean of all the variables was provided for the 7 studies, while 3 studies included a control group of ACL Revision with HT and were included in a meta-analysis. A total of 420 participants with a mean age of 28.9 ± 10.5 years and a mean postoperative follow-up of 39.3 ± 16.4 months were assessed. Of these, 277 patients underwent ACL Revision with QT and 143 patients underwent ACL Revision with HT. In the QT group, average graft failure was 9.8% compared to 17.4% in the HT group. KOOS Sport and pivot-shift test showed better postoperative outcomes in QT than HT, although it was not statistically significant (p = 0.052).
Conclusion: The QT autograft was associated with an improved trend of rotatory laxity, PROMs and failure rate compared to HT autograft after revision ACL reconstruction. The QT autograft for revision ACL reconstruction is supported by the current literature. It is a viable graft that should be considered for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Keywords: ACL; Anterior cruciate ligament; Hamstring tendon; Meta analysis; Quadriceps tendon; Systematic review.
© 2023. The Author(s)
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the 5-year clinical and functional outcomes of the soft-tissue quadriceps tendon (QT) with those of the hamstring tendon (HT) autograft.
Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either soft-tissue QT or double-tendon HT autograft with at least 5 years of follow-up was conducted. Surgical technique included anteromedial portal creation for the femoral tunnel and transtibial technique for the tibia. Graft fixation was achieved with interference composite screws for the QT and combination of interference composite screw and suture button for the HT cohort. The 2 groups were compared for differences in outcomes, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, return to sport, and complications.
Results: A total of 37 patients with QT autograft and 46 HT autografts were included in the study, with a mean follow up of 69.9 months and 70.9 months, respectively. The QT group demonstrated a larger graft size on average (9.64 mm vs 7.90 mm, P < .001). The IKDC and Lysholm scores were similar between the 2 groups at 2-years' postoperatively. At 5 years' postoperatively, the QT group demonstrated significantly greater IKDC (P = .018) and Lysholm (P = .007) scores. The cohorts demonstrated similar rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference thresholds at both 2 and 5 years' postoperatively. The 2 groups also demonstrated comparable rates of return to sport, time to return, and postoperative complications.
Conclusions: Although the QT autograft demonstrated increased patient-reported outcome scores when compared with the HT at 5 years' postoperatively, there was no clinically significant difference between the cohorts at 2 or 5 years' postoperatively. The QT autograft is an effective alternative to HT autograft with noninferior results to the HT autograft at mid-term follow-up.
Level of evidence: III, retrospective comparison study.
Copyright © 2022 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the radiographic effect of quadriceps tendon harvest on patellar height and to determine whether closure of a quadriceps graft harvest defect resulted in a significant change in patellar height compared to nonclosure.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively enrolled patients. The institutional database was queried and all patients who underwent quadriceps autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 2015 and March 2020 were included. Graft harvest length in millimeters and final graft diameter after preparation for implantation were obtained from the operative record and demographic data were obtained from the medical record. Radiographic analysis was performed of eligible patients using standard ratios of patellar height: Insall-Salvati (IS), Blackburn-Peele (BP), and Caton-Deschamps (CD). Measurements were performed using digital calipers on a digital imaging system by 2 postgraduate fellow surgeons. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were performed at 0° according to a standard protocol. Postoperative radiographs were performed 6 weeks postoperatively in all cases. Preoperative patellar height ratios were compared with postoperative patellar height ratios for all patients using t-tests. Subanalysis was then performed to compare the effect of closure of with nonclosure on patellar height ratios using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Interrater reliability between the 2 reviewers was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient calculation.
Results: In total, 70 patients met final inclusion criteria. There were no statistically significant changes from pre- to postoperative values for either reviewer for IS (reviewer 1, P = .47; reviewer 2, P = .353), BP (reviewer 1, P = .98; reviewer 2, P = .907), or CD (reviewer 1, P = .107; reviewer, 2 P = .188). The closure and nonclosure groups were adequately powered and no statistically significant demographic differences between the closure and nonclosure groups was identified for sex (P = .066), age (P = .343), weight (P = .881), height (P = .42), laterality (P = 1), meniscal repair (P = .332), graft diameter (P = .068), or graft length (P = .183). According to the repeated measures analysis of variance, closure of the quadriceps defect had no significant impact on any of the knee ratios. However, reviewer identity had a significant influence on the CD ratio. Intraclass correlation coefficient analysis revealed excellent agreement between reviewers for the IS (0.982) and BP (0.954) ratios, but only moderate-to-good agreement for the CD (0.751) ratio.
Conclusions: Harvest of quadriceps tendon graft does not result in radiographic changes in patellar height. Furthermore, closure of the quadriceps defect does not appear to result in radiographic changes in patellar height.
Level of evidence: III, retrospective comparative trial.
© 2022 The Authors.
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Objectives: To compare clinical and functional outcomes of patients after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using quadriceps tendon- (QT-A) and hamstring tendon (HT-A) autograft with a minimum follow-up (FU) of 5 years.
Methods: Between 2010 and 2014, all patients undergoing ACLR were recorded in a prospectively administered database. All patients with primary, isolated QT-A ACLR and without any concomitant injuries or high grade of osteoarthritis were extracted from the database and matched to patients treated with HT-A. Re-rupture rates, anterior-posterior (ap) knee laxity, single-leg hop test (SLHT) performance, distal thigh circumference (DTC) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were recorded. Between group comparisons were performed using chi-square-, independent-samples T- or Mann-Whitney-U tests.
Results: 45 QT-A patients were matched to 45 HT-A patients (n = 90). The mean FU was 78.9 ± 13.6 months. 18 patients (20.0%/QT-A: N = 8, 17.8%; HT-A: n = 10, 22.2%; p = .60) sustained a graft rupture and 17 subjects (18.9%/QT-A: n = 9, 20.0%; HT-A: n = 8, 17.8%; p = .79) suffered a contralateral ACL injury. In high active patients (Tegner activity level ≥ 7) rerupture rates increased to 37.5% (HT-A) and 22.2% (QT-A; p = .32), respectively. Patients with graft failure did not differ between both groups in terms of mean age at surgery (QT-A: 26.5 ± 11.6 years, HT-A: 23.3 ± 9.5 years, p = .63) or graft thickness (mean graft square area: QT-A: 43.6 ± 4.7 mm2, HT-A: 48.1 ± 7.9 mm2, p = .27). No statistical between-group differences were found in ap knee laxity side-to-side (SSD) measurements (QT-A: 1.9 ± 1.2 mm, HT-A: 2.1 ± 1.5 mm; p = .60), subjective IKDC- (QT-A: 93.8 ± 6.8, HT-A: 91.2 ± 7.8, p = .17), Lysholm- (QT-A 91.9 ± 7.2, HT-A: 91.5 ± 9.7, p = .75) or any of the five subscales of the KOOS score (all p > .05). Furthermore, Tegner activity level (QT-A: 6(1.5), HT-A: 6(2), p = .62), VAS for pain (QT-A: 0.5 ± 0.9, HT-A: 0.6 ± 1.0, p = .64), Shelbourne-Trumper score (QT-A: 96.5 ± 5.6, HT-A: 95.2 ± 8.2, p = .50), Patient and Observer Scar -Assessment scale (POSAS) (QT-A: 9.4 ± 3.2, HT-A: 10.7 ± 4.9, p = .24), SSD-DTC (QT-A: 0.5 ± 0.5, HT.- A: 0.5 ± 0.6, p = .97), return to sports rates (QT-A: 82.1%, HT-A: 86.7%) and SLHT (QT -A: 95.9 ± 3.8%, HT-A: 93.7 ± 7.0%) did not differ between groups. Donor-site morbidity (HT-A n = 14, 46.7%; QT-A n = 3, 11.5%; p = .008) was statistically significantly lower in the QT-A group. Five patients (11.1%) of the HT-group and three patients (6.7%) in the QT-group required revision surgery (p = .29).
Conclusion: Patient-reported outcome measures, knee laxity, functional testing results and re-rupture rates are similar between patients treated with QT- and HT- autografts. However, patients with QT-autograft have a smaller tibial postoperative scar length and lower postoperative donor-site morbidity. There is a tendency towards higher graft rupture rates in highly active patients treated with HT autograft.
Level of evidence: II.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Autograft; Donor-site morbidity; Graft rupture; Hamstring tendon; Quadriceps tendon.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2021
Introduction
Purpose: To compare subjective outcomes and complications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using either bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data identified consecutive cohorts of patients undergoing ACLR with either BPTB or QT autograft. Patients with less than 12-month follow-up and those undergoing concomitant osteotomies, cartilage restoration, and/or other ligament reconstruction procedures were excluded. Pre- and postsurgical patient-reported outcomes including International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Tegner, and Marx were compared between groups. Complications requiring reoperation were recorded.
Results: One hundred nineteen patients met inclusion criteria, including 39 QT autografts and 80 BPTB autografts. Demographic information was comparable between groups. Mean follow-up was comparable between groups (QT 22.4 ± 10.6 months vs BPTB 28.5 ± 18.5 months, P = .06). At minimum 12-month follow-up (range 12.0-100.8 months), patients in both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in International Knee Documentation Committee (QT 60.0%, P< .0001; BPTB 57.7%, P < .0001), all Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score domains, PROMIS Mobility T-Score (QT 27.2%, P = .0001; BPTB 23.2%, P < .0001), PROMIS Global Physical Health (QT 14.4%, P = .002; BPTB 13.4%, P = .001), PROMIS Physical Function (QT 29.6%, P < .0001; BPTB 37.1%, P < .0001), PROMIS Pain Interference (QT -16.5%, P < .0001; BPTB -20.8%, P < .0001), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, (QT 76.9%, P < .0001; BPTB 73.3%, P < .0001), Tegner (QT 92.9%, P = .0002; BPTB 101.4%, P < .0001), and Marx (QT -26.6%, P = .02; BPTB -32.0%, P = .0002) with no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Overall postoperative reoperation rate did not differ between groups (QT 12.8% vs BPTB 23.8%, P = .2). Revision ACL reconstruction rate did not differ between groups (QT 5.1% vs BPTB 7.5%, P = .6).
Conclusions: Patients undergoing autograft ACLR with either BPTB or QT demonstrated significant subjective improvements in patient-reported outcomes from preoperative values and no statistically significant differences in outcomes between the groups. Complication and revision ACLR rates were similar between the 2 groups.
Level of evidence: III, retrospective cohort study.
© 2021 The Authors.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Importance: A paucity of clinical evidence surrounds the effect of the knee flexion angle during tibial fixation of the graft during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While biomechanical studies have recently sought to revive this area of study in both single- and double-bundle graft populations, they have done so using variants of the hamstring graft. This does not shed light on the optimal fixation of other autograft options, namely, the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft.
Objectives: To determine the effect of the knee flexion angle during tibial graft fixation on functional and clinical outcomes following ACL reconstruction using single-bundle QT autograft, inclusive of both soft-tissue and bone-plug graft types.
Evidence review: An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was carried out from database inception to June 2020. Following study screening, patient demographics and fixation technique as well as both subjective and objective clinical outcomes were abstracted. Studies were divided based on the knee flexion angle during tibial fixation of the graft. The low knee flexion angle (L-KFA) group included patients with a tibial fixation angle of < 30° of flexion, and the high knee flexion (H-KFA) group included those with a tibial fixation of exactly 30° of flexion. The data were qualitatively synthesized due to significant heterogeneity across the included studies.
Findings: Sixteen studies (1,169 patients) were included for analysis. There were 675 patients in the L-KFA group (mean age range, 18.7-34.5 years) and 494 patients in the H-KFA group (mean age range, of 23.2-32.1 years). Both groups yielded statistically significant improvements from preoperative to postoperative scores across several functional and clinical outcomes. Return to pre-injury activity levels ranged from 64% to 81% in L-KFA studies and from 73.3% to 86.7% in H-KFA studies. All-cause graft failure rates ranged from 1.4% to 4.3% in L-FKA studies and from 0%-10.7% in H-KFA studies.
Conclusion: Both low- and high-knee flexion angles during tibial graft fixation produce improved postoperative clinical and functional outcomes with comparable outcomes across groups. There is inconclusive evidence to recommend the ideal knee flexion angle for graft fixation in primary ACLR.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Arthroscopy; Autografts; Knee; Quadriceps tendon.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Objectives: This study was designed to evaluate, compare the mid-term functional outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using different autografts and assess the cause of failure of primary ACLR in an Omani population with kneeling customs.
Materials and methods: Patients with failed primary ACLR who underwent revision ACLR using autografts were included in this retrospective study. The cause of primary ACLR failure and the functional outcome was assessed using the Tegner-Lyholm knee score and compared among bone patella tendon-bone (BPTB), quadriceps tendon (QT), semitendinosus gracilis (STG) autografts used.
Results: One hundred two patients (102 male) were included in the study with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Thirty-one patients underwent revision with BPTB, 34 with STG and 19 with QT autografts. Majority of the patients (70.23%) achieved good-to-excellent functional outcome based on their Tegner-Lysholm scores. The functional outcome of different autografts was comparable to each other based on Kruskal-Wallis test. The causes of primary ACLR failure were failure due to trauma in 58.33% of patients, technical failure in 22.61% of patients, and nontraumatic failure in 19.04% of patients.
Conclusions: The functional outcome of revision ACLR in this Middle Eastern Asian Omani population was good-to-excellent, with the patients experiencing no difficulty in performing activities of daily living, including kneeling activities. The outcome of different autografts, BTPB, QT, STSG is similar in high knee flexion patients with no autograft found to be superior. The findings of this study add to the literature on functional outcomes after primary and revision ACLR in a customary kneeling population.
Keywords: ACL; Autografts; High flexion; Kneeling; Oman; Outcomes; Revision.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Introduction: Comparable data of functional outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either hamstring- or quadriceps tendon grafts is controversial. This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to provide data comparing both grafts regarding the functional outcome.
Materials and methods: A two centre trial involving symptomatic patients 18 years of age or older with an anterior cruciate ligament tear was conducted. We randomly assigned 27 patients to quadruple hamstring tendon reconstruction and 24 to quadriceps tendon reconstruction. The patients were evaluated preoperatively, at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery. The primary outcome parameter was the side-to-side knee laxity measured with an arthrometer. Secondary outcomes included results in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm Scores and isokinetic testing of strength in knee extension and flexion.
Results: Forty-four patients (86%) completed the 2-year follow-up. There was significantly improved knee stability at all time intervals with no difference between the two study groups. The manual side-to-side displacement improved by 4.7 ± 3.0 mm in patients with hamstring tendon reconstruction and 5.5 ± 2.9 mm in patients with quadriceps tendon reconstruction. In addition, muscle strength and outcome scores (IKDC and Lysholm Score) did not show any differences between the hamstring tendon group and the quadriceps tendon group. Patients in the hamstring tendon group returned to their pre-injury activity level after 95.2 ± 45.5 days while patients in the quadriceps tendon group needed 82.1 ± 45.6 days.
Conclusion: Quadriceps and hamstring tendon autografts yield comparably good results in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Hamstring tendon; Knee; Quadriceps tendon.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Year of publishing
2023
Abstract
Purpose: To perform a meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating donor site morbidity after bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB), hamstring tendon (HT) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
Methods: PubMed, OVID/Medline and Cochrane databases were queried in July 2022. All level one articles reporting the frequency of specific donor-site morbidity were included. Frequentist model network meta-analyses with P-scores were conducted to compare the prevalence of donor-site morbidity, complications, all-cause reoperations and revision ACLR among the three treatment groups.
Results: Twenty-one RCTs comprising the outcomes of 1726 patients were included. The overall pooled rate of donor-site morbidity (defined as anterior knee pain, difficulty/impossibility kneeling, or combination) was 47.3% (range, 3.8-86.7%). A 69% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.18-0.56) and 88% (95% CI: 0.04-0.33) lower odds of incurring donor-site morbidity was observed with HT and QT autografts, respectively (p < 0.0001, both), when compared to BTB autograft. QT autograft was associated with a non-statistically significant reduction in donor-site morbidity compared with HT autograft (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.14-1.03, n.s.). Treatment rankings (ordered from best-to-worst autograft choice with respect to donor-site morbidity) were as follows: (1) QT (P-score = 0.99), (2) HT (P-score = 0.51) and (3) BTB (P-score = 0.00). No statistically significant associations were observed between autograft and complications (n.s.), reoperations (n.s.) or revision ACLR (n.s.).
Conclusion: ACLR using HT and QT autograft tissue was associated with a significant reduction in donor-site morbidity compared to BTB autograft. Autograft selection was not associated with complications, all-cause reoperations, or revision ACLR. Based on the current data, there is sufficient evidence to recommend that autograft selection should be personalized through considering differential rates of donor-site morbidity in the context of patient expectations and activity level without concern for a clinically important change in the rate of adverse events.
Level of evidence: Level I.
Keywords: ACL; Anterior cruciate ligament; Autograft; Donor site; Meta-analysis; Morbidity; Network; Reconstruction.
© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Background: Multiple graft options exist for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in an adolescent athlete. Patellar tendon harvest can lead to anterior knee pain, while hamstring tendon harvest can affect knee flexion strength and alter mechanics. Allograft is less desirable in pediatric patients due to the higher failure rate and slight risk of disease transmission. Quadriceps tendon autograft has rarely been reported for adolescent ACL reconstruction in the USA, but is an excellent option due to its large size, low donor site morbidity, and versatility. The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes of adolescents who have undergone ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft.
Methods: Twenty-two ACL reconstructions using the quadriceps autograft were performed on 21 pediatric patients by the senior author between 2010 and 2017. The patient's demographics, injury characteristics, imaging, physical examination findings, operative findings, outcomes and sports were recorded.
Results: The average age at the time of surgery was 15 years. Two patients had open physes; the remainder had closing physes. 64% of patients had additional meniscal tears and 76% had bony contusions. The average duration of follow-up was 2.8 years (range 2-5 years). At final follow-up, there were no angular deformities or leg length discrepancies. The average quadriceps atrophy of the operative leg was 4 mm. The average Lysholm score was 98. 86% of patients returned to sports. No patients had re-rupture of their operative ACL. No incidences of infections, numbness, or anterior knee pain were reported. Two patients had a second arthroscopy for re-injury, revealing new meniscal tears but intact ACL grafts.
Conclusions: Use of quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction in adolescent patients allows reliable return to sport with minimal complications.
Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.
Keywords: Adolescent; Anterior cruciate ligament; Quadriceps; Reconstruction; Tendon.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Background: Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is being performed at an increasing rate. Previous literature has suggested that autograft ACL reconstruction is a better option than allograft in revision surgery, although the optimal autograft choice remains unknown. The all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (ASTQT) autograft has been found to be an effective option for primary ACL reconstruction. However, few studies have evaluated ASTQT autograft in revision ACL reconstruction.
Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ASTQT autograft in revision ACL reconstruction in athletes compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft. We hypothesized that the ASTQT autograft would lead to similar return to play, time to return to play, retear rate, and patient-reported outcomes compared with BTB autograft.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: A retrospective study was performed on all athletes undergoing revision ACL reconstruction between August 2013 and December 2019 at a single institution. Patients participating in high school or college athletics undergoing first-time revision with either ASTQT or BTB autograft with ≥2 years of follow-up were included. Demographic variables, complications, return to sports, and outcome scores including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm were collected and compared between the 2 cohorts.
Results: A total of 58 revision ACL reconstructions were included, with 32 in the ASTQT cohort and 26 in the BTB cohort. Return to sports at the same level occurred in 62.5% of the ASTQT group and 53.8% of the BTB group. The ASTQT group returned to sports significantly faster than the BTB group (8.9 vs 10.3 months; P = .020). There was no difference in retear rates (3.1%, ASTQT; 7.7%, BTB) or other complications between the 2 groups. The IKDC scores were significantly higher at the 6- and 12-month follow-up for the ASTQT autograft group compared with the BTB group (6 months: ASTQT, 71.3; BTB, 61.7, P = .001; 12 months: ASTQT, 82.7; BTB, 78.6; P = .021). Lysholm scores were also greater in the ASTQT cohort at these time points (6 months: ASTQT, 75.1; BTB, 63.6; P < .001; 12 months: ASTQT, 82.0; BTB, 74.5; P < .001). However, IKDC and Lysholm scores were similar between both groups at final follow-up (IKDC: ASTQT, 82.9; BTB, 81.7; P = .344; Lysholm: ASTQT, 83.0; BTB, 81.0; P = .104) There was no significant clinical difference in the absolute difference in scores or rate of achieving clinical thresholds between the 2 cohorts.
Conclusion: ASTQT autograft for revision ACL in athletes has similar outcomes compared with BTB autograft. However, the ASTQT may possibly afford quicker return to sports and better early improvements in patient-reported outcomes that normalize by 1 year. The soft tissue quadriceps autograft should be considered a viable graft option in revision ACL reconstruction in athletes.
Keywords: ACL; ACL reconstruction; anterior cruciate ligament; autograft; outcomes; patellar tendon; quadriceps tendon; revision ACL reconstruction.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Background: Autograft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains controversial, with increasing interest in the usage of quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft versus traditional hamstring tendon (HT) use. The current study undertakes an in-depth review and comparison of the clinical and functional outcomes of QT and HT autografts in ACLR.
Hypothesis: The QT autograft is equivalent to the HT autograft and there will be little or no significant difference in the outcomes between these 2 autografts.
Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: The PUBMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from their inception until November 2020. All observational studies comparing ACLR QT and HT autografts were assessed for their methodological quality. Patient outcomes were compared according to patient-reported outcome measures (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Cincinnati, Lysholm, Tegner, and visual analog scale [VAS] measures), knee extensor and flexor torque limb symmetry indices (LSIs), hamstring to quadriceps (H/Q) ratios, functional hop capacity, knee laxity, ipsilateral graft failure, and contralateral injury.
Results: A total of 20 observational studies comprising 28,621 patients (QT = 2550; HT = 26,071) were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. In comparison with patients who received an HT autograft, those who received a QT autograft had similar postoperative Lysholm (mean difference [MD], 0.67; P = .630), IKDC (MD, 0.48; P = .480), VAS pain (MD, 0.04; P = .710), and Cincinnati (MD, -0.85; P = .660) scores; LSI for knee flexor strength (MD, 6.06; P = .120); H/Q ratio (MD, 3.22; P = .160); hop test LSI (MD, -1.62; P = .230); pivot-shift test grade 0 (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; P = .180); Lachman test grade 0 (OR, 2.38; P = .320), side-to-side laxity (MD, 0.09; P = .650); incidence of graft failure (OR, 1.07; P = .830) or contralateral knee injury (OR, 1.22; P = .610); and Tegner scores (MD, 0.11; P = .060). HT autografts were associated with a higher (better) side-to-side LSI for knee extensor strength (MD, -6.31; P = .0002).
Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, the use of the QT autograft was equivalent to the HT autograft in ACLR, with comparable graft failure and clinical and functional outcomes observed. However, HT autografts were associated with better LSI knee extensor strength.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; autograft; hamstring tendon; meta-analysis; quadriceps tendon.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Importance: There have been several recent systematic reviews of quadriceps tendon autografts (QT), which have not shown any significant difference in outcomes between QT and hamstring tendon autograft (HS) for ACL reconstruction (ACLR). However, several recent comparative studies have been published comparing QT to HS for ACLR.
Aim: The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies comparing QT to HS for ACLR.
Evidence review: Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on the PRISMA guidelines, with a senior author arbitrating discrepancies. Cohort studies comparing QT with HS were included.
Findings: There were 15 studies comparing 611 patients with QT to 543 patients with HS, with a mean of 27.4 months follow-up. QT resulted in a significantly lower rate of graft re-rupture (2.5% vs 8.7%, p = 0.01), and donor site morbidity (17.6% vs 26.2%, p = 0.02). There was a significant difference in favour of QT for the positive pivot shift test (Grade I/II: 15.8% vs 23.0%, p = 0.02), but not in the rate of the positive Lachman test (Grade I/II: 18.3% vs 26.7%, p = 0.16). Additionally, there was no difference in the side to side difference in knee stability (1.8 mm vs 2.0 mm, p = 0.48). Functionally, both grafts had similar functional outcomes in terms of the IKDC score (88.0 vs 87.9, p = 0.69), and Lysholm score (89.3 vs 87.6, p = 0.15).
Conclusions and relevance: Our study showed that QT has a lower re-rupture rate than HS in ACLR, with lower donor site morbidity. QT appeared to be slightly better for residual pivot shift, but there was no difference in patient-reported outcomes.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Autograft; Hamstring tendon; Quadriceps tendon; Systematic review.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review is to report complications, graft failure, fixation methods, rehabilitation protocol, clinical and patient-reported outcomes, and return to sports with the use of quadriceps tendon graft with the bone block (QT-B) and without bone block (QT-S).
Methods: According to the PRISMA guidelines a comprehensive search was performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception until April 2022. Only prospective studies using quadriceps tendon autograft with a minimum of 20 patients were considered for inclusion. The outcome measures extracted from the studies were the KT-1000, Lysholm score, Subjective and Objective IKDC, Tegner, Marx Score, complications, failures and/or revision surgery, and rate of return to sports. Cochrane risk of bias and MINORS tool were used for the risk of bias assessment of all included studies.
Results: A total of 13 studies were included, consisting of 5 randomized controlled trials, 6 cohort studies, 1 case-control and 1 case series. A total of 484 patients received QT-S in 6 studies of which 224 (46.2%) were males and 212 (43.8%) females with a mean age of 21.5 ± 7.5 (range 14-58). While 243 patients received QT-B in 7 studies of which 167 (68.7%) were males and 76 (31.3%) females with a mean age of 28.9 ± 4.5 (range: 18-49). The studies analyzed had a mean MINORS score of 14.6 (range, 12-19). Both QT-B and QT-S for ACL reconstruction reported satisfactory results in terms of patient-reported outcome measures. Although, a slightly higher anterior laxity was found with the QT-S than with the QT-B.
Conclusion: Quadriceps tendon with a bone block (QT-B) or without bone block (QT-S) for ACL reconstruction is supported by current literature. Both grafts are safe and viable options for ACL reconstruction with comparable clinical outcomes, complications and revision rates.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Recent systematic reviews have shown anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon (QT) grafts to have superior clinical outcomes compared with traditional bone-patella tendon-bone and hamstring tendons grafts. Using minimally invasive techniques to harvest the QT graft can reduce postoperative pain and intraoperative surgical time. This technique is usually performed with a distal-to-proximal approach but often has issues of inadvertently harvesting a graft short of the desired length or causing a hematoma. As an alternative, we introduce a minimally invasive approach with a proximal-to-distal harvest technique that results in better visualization of tissue planes, more consistent graft sizes, lower risk of inadvertent arthrotomy, and reduced risk of hematoma. The minimally invasive QT graft harvest with a proximal-to-distal approach can offer unique advantages over the current standard distal-to-proximal approach
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the performance of the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft in pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE was conducted on March 1, 2021. Studies of all levels of evidence reporting outcomes and/or complications after QT autograft ACLR in pediatric patients (≤ 18 years old) were eligible for inclusion. Study demographics, patient demographics, reported outcomes, and complications were abstracted. Screening and data abstraction were designed in accordance with PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines. Descriptive statistics were presented when applicable, with data for heterogeneous outcomes presented in narrative summary fashion.
Results: A total of 14 studies examining 596 patients (46.3% female), mean age 15.4 years, were included in this systematic review. Mean postoperative Lysholm scores ranged from 94.0 to 99.5. Mean postoperative IKDC subjective scores ranged from 75.9 to 94.0. Limb symmetry index ranged from 96.8 ± 10.4 to 100.4 ± 7.6% across multiple hop tests. Return to sports (RTS) rates ranged from 88.9 to 91.7%. Eleven studies reported postoperative complications, whereby 16 patients (4.8%) experienced contralateral complications and injuries. Forty-six patients (9.4%) experienced ipsilateral complications, including ten graft failures (2.5%) and two growth disturbances (0.6%).
Conclusions: QT autograft ACLR in the pediatric population retains the potential of regaining a preinjury level of knee stability, and yields promising postoperative function and rates of RTS, yielding comparable outcomes relative to HT autograft and the reference-standard BPTB ACLR that have previously been described in the literature. Moreover, use of the QT autograft is associated with low rates of postoperative complications, including graft failure and growth disturbances in this active and high-risk patient population in observational studies to date. Therefore, clinical equipoise exists to further appraise the influence of QT autograft on postoperative outcomes compared to aforementioned autograft options in a randomized control trial fashion.
Level of evidence: IV.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Knee; Pediatric; Quadriceps tendon.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether there was a difference in clinical outcomes between patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (sQT) autograft versus QT with bone block (bQT).
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 708 patients who underwent QT ACLR was conducted. Primary ACLR patients with at least 1 year of follow-up were identified and those who received sQT were compared to those who received bQT. Data collection entailed patient demographics, surgical variables, patient reported outcomes (PROs), knee stability testing, and complications. The primary outcome of interest was International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, reported as mean score, pre- and postoperative difference, and number who met minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Secondary outcomes included Lachman and pivot shift grade, other patient reported outcomes (PROs), complication rates, and return to sport (RTS).
Results: A total of 195 patients (147 sQT, 48 bQT) who underwent primary QT ACLR met criteria for analysis, with mean follow-up of 17.0 ± 7.9 months. No difference was detected between cohorts with respect to postoperative IKDC score (sQT: n = 120, 81.0 ± 18.9, bQT: n = 10, 80.9 ± 20.4, n.s.), proportion of patients who met MCID (sQT: 68/78 [87%], bQT: 6/7 [86%], n.s.), or results of stability testing. In the sQT cohort, 86% (106/123) of athletes achieved full RTS, compared to 85% (34/40) in the bQT cohort (n.s.). Time to RTS was less than a year in both cohorts (sQT: 10.5 ± 3.8 months [n = 106], bQT: 11.1 ± 3.9 months [n = 31], n.s.). Graft rupture occurred in 7 (5%) sQT patients and 3 (6%) bQT patients (n.s.), and all clinical failures were due to graft rupture (n.s.). No differences were detected for rates of postoperative complications.
Conclusion: No differences in clinical outcomes were detected between patients who underwent primary ACLR with sQT autograft versus bQT autograft. Currently, the decision to employ sQT or bQT is largely determined by surgeon preference. This study demonstrates excellent outcomes with both preparations and supports the use of either graft type at the discretion of the treating surgeon.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Anterior cruciate ligament; Knee; Quadriceps tendon autograft; Sports medicine.
Year of publishing
2022
Background: The quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft is a commonly used and effective graft option for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Surgical techniques vary, and there is no current standard of care for management of the QT autograft harvest site.
Purpose: To examine the literature on patient-reported outcomes and complications after ACLR with a QT autograft and to further clarify the frequency with which the harvest site is closed and potential biomechanical implications.
Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: A systematic review according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was performed using multiple medical databases. Level 1 to 4 studies on patients undergoing ACLR with a QT autograft were included. There were 2 independent reviewers who analyzed all studies. Study quality was analyzed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies checklist.
Results: Overall, 13 studies with a total of 650 patients were included. The mean patient age for all studies was 31 years (range, 14-59 years) with a mean follow-up of 21.2 months (range, 6-84 months). Of the 13 studies, 12 studies (92%) documented patient sex, comprising 331 female patients (55%) and 274 male patients (45%). There were 8 studies (62%) that reported the use of a bony QT autograft in 273 patients, and 5 studies (38%) reported the use of a soft tissue QT autograft in 377 patients. The graft length harvested was most commonly 7 to 8 cm, while the tendon width harvested was 10 mm. Moreover, 5 studies (38%) did not discuss closure of the harvest site, while 2 studies (15%) only closed the harvest site if a capsular rent was present. The surgical technique for harvest-site closure varied when reported in 7 studies (54%). Good to excellent clinical outcomes were reported in 80% of patients when the harvest site was closed.
Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, there is no consensus on whether the QT defect should be closed after harvesting the graft for ACLR. It has been reported that closure of the harvest site is performed if there is a capsular rent present. Several techniques are utilized to close the QT autograft harvest site; however, it is unclear if there is a difference in outcomes based on the technique used. Future studies should further clarify whether there are any biomechanical and clinical advantages to closing the QT autograft harvest site.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; quadriceps tendon autograft; sports medicine.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Background: This systematic review explores the differences in the intrinsic biomechanical properties of different graft sources used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction as tested in a laboratory setting.
Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, two authors conducted a systematic review exploring the biomechanical properties of ACL graft sources (querying PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases). Using the keywords "anterior cruciate ligament graft," "biomechanics," and "biomechanical testing," relevant articles of any level of evidence were identified as eligible and included if they reported on the biomechanical properties of skeletally immature or mature ACL grafts solely and if the grafts were studied in vitro, in isolation, and under similar testing conditions. Studies were excluded if performed on both skeletally immature and mature or non-human grafts, or if the grafts were tested after fixation in a cadaveric knee. For each graft, failure load, stiffness, Young's modulus, maximum stress, and maximum strain were recorded.
Findings: Twenty-six articles were included. Most studies reported equal or increased biomechanical failure load and stiffness of their tested bone-patellar tendon-bone, hamstring, quadriceps, peroneus longus, tibialis anterior and posterior, Achilles, tensor fascia lata, and iliotibial band grafts compared to the native ACL. All recorded biomechanical properties had similar values between graft types.
Interpretation: Most grafts used for ACL reconstruction are biomechanically superior to the native ACL. Utilizing a proper graft, combined with a standard surgical technique and a rigorous rehabilitation before and after surgery, will improve outcomes of ACL reconstruction.
Keywords: Anterior; Autograft; Biomechanics; Cruciate; Ligament; Reconstruction.
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
Purpose: The choice of graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains controversial. The quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft is a good alternative for ACL reconstruction. However, concerns regarding its use in short-statured patients, related to donor site morbidity, anterior knee pain, or loss of muscle strength remain. This study aimed to compare muscle strength and morbidity between patients with short and normal statures following ACL reconstruction with a QT autograft.
Methods: A total of 73 female patients (mean age, 33.8 ± 11.5 years) who underwent primary ACL reconstruction between 2016 and 2019 were included. Patients were categorized into two groups: group S, with a height ≤ 163 cm, and group L, with a height > 163 cm. Muscle strength, harvesting site morbidity, and ACL-return to sport after injury scale (ACL-RSI) were evaluated, with a mean timing of the follow-up of 9.0 ± 2.3 months.
Results: The mean quadriceps strength for the isokinetic measurements at 60° and 240° was 65.0% and 74.0% in group S, respectively, and 70.0% and 75.7% in group L, respectively. There was no significant difference in the postoperative muscle strength or mean ACL-RSI (group S, 70.0; group L, 65.9) between the groups. No donor site morbidity was observed in either group.
Conclusion: Muscle strength recovery, morbidity, and readiness to return to sports were similar in both groups, which supports the possibility of QT autografts for patients with a small stature. The results of this study may provide useful information for surgeons who are hesitant to perform QT autografts because of patient physique.
Level of evidence: IV.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Graft choice; Muscle strength; Quadriceps tendon; Small stature patient.
Year of publishing
2022
Objective: This study proposes to systematically review the literature and compare data on (1) function, (2) pain, (3) return to sport, and (4) complications after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft (QT) and hamstring tendon autograft (HT).
Methods: In June 2021, a systematic review of the EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and LILACS databases was performed, based on PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy included the keywords: "Previous Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction," "ACL reconstruction," "quadriceps tendon autograft," "quadriceps graft," "Hamstring-Tendon Autografts." Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager software (RevMan Web).
Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding function according to Lysholm score (MD 3.01; CI-0.30, 6.33, p = 0.08), the presence of pain (RR 0.89; CI-0.57, 1.39, p = 0.60), and re-rupture (RR 0.60; IC-0.19, 1.88, p = 0.38).
Conclusion: QT and HT autografts show comparatively good results in ACL reconstruction without significant differences regarding function, pain, and rupture after surgical intervention. Level of Evidence II, Systematic Review of Level II Studies.
Keywords: Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Hamstring Tendons; Quadriceps Muscle; Tendons.
Year of publishing
00.00.0000
Abstract
Background: The best type of autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains debatable.
Hypothesis: Compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts, the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has comparable graft survival as well as clinical function and pain outcomes.
Study design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to July 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting comparisons of QT versus BPTB or HT autografts for ACL reconstruction were included. All analyses were stratified according to study design: RCTs or observational studies.
Results: A total of 24 studies were included: 7 RCTs and 17 observational studies. The 7 RCTs included 388 patients, and the 17 observational studies included 19,196 patients. No significant differences in graft failure (P = .36), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score (P = .39), or the side-to-side difference in stability (P = .60) were noted between QT and BPTB autografts. However, a significant reduction in donor site morbidity was noted in the QT group compared with the BPTB group (risk ratio [RR], 0.17 [95% CI, 0.09-0.33]; P < .001). No significant differences in graft failure (P = .57), the IKDC subjective score (P = .25), or the side-to-side stability difference (P = .98) were noted between QT and HT autografts. However, the QT autograft was associated with a significantly lower rate of donor site morbidity than the HT autograft (RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.93]; P = .02). A similar graft failure rate between the QT and control groups was observed after both early and late full weightbearing, after early and late full range of motion, and after using the QT autograft with a bone plug and all soft tissue QT grafts. However, a significantly lower rate of donor site morbidity was observed in the QT group compared with the control group after both early and late full weightbearing, after early and late full range of motion, and after using the QT autograft with a bone plug and all soft tissue QT grafts. No difference in effect estimates was seen between RCTs and observational studies.
Conclusion: The QT autograft had comparable graft survival, functional outcomes, and stability outcomes compared with BPTB and HT autografts. However, donor site morbidity was significantly lower with the QT autograft than with BPTB and HT autografts.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; bone–patellar tendon–bone; hamstring tendon; quadriceps tendon
Year of publishing
2022
Abstract
The ideal graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) continues to be debated. Although first described in 1984, use of the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has only recently gained popularity. The biomechanical properties of the QT autograft are favourable compared to bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and doubled hamstring (HS) grafts with a higher load to failure and a modulus of elasticity that more closely approximates the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The QT graft can be harvested with or without a bone plug, as either a full thickness or a partial thickness graft, and even through minimally invasive techniques. The surgeon must be aware of potential harvest risks including patellar fracture or a graft that is of insufficient length. Numerous short-term studies have shown comparable results when compared to BPTB or hamstring HS autografts with similar graft failure rates, patient-reported outcomes. A major advantage of QT ACLR is reduced donor site morbidity compared to BPTB. However, some persistent quadriceps weakness after QT ACLR has also been reported. The current literature shows that use of the QT autograft for ACLR provides equivalent clinical results compared to other autografts with less donor site morbidity. However, future studies with longer follow-up and higher level of evidence are needed to identify specific populations where the QT may have additional advantage.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Autograft; Quadriceps tendon.
Year of publishing
2021
Introduction: Comparable data of functional outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either hamstring- or quadriceps tendon grafts is controversial. This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to provide data comparing both grafts regarding the functional outcome.
Materials and methods: A two centre trial involving symptomatic patients 18 years of age or older with an anterior cruciate ligament tear was conducted. We randomly assigned 27 patients to quadruple hamstring tendon reconstruction and 24 to quadriceps tendon reconstruction. The patients were evaluated preoperatively, at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery. The primary outcome parameter was the side-to-side knee laxity measured with an arthrometer. Secondary outcomes included results in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm Scores and isokinetic testing of strength in knee extension and flexion.
Results: Forty-four patients (86%) completed the 2-year follow-up. There was significantly improved knee stability at all time intervals with no difference between the two study groups. The manual side-to-side displacement improved by 4.7 ± 3.0 mm in patients with hamstring tendon reconstruction and 5.5 ± 2.9 mm in patients with quadriceps tendon reconstruction. In addition, muscle strength and outcome scores (IKDC and Lysholm Score) did not show any differences between the hamstring tendon group and the quadriceps tendon group. Patients in the hamstring tendon group returned to their pre-injury activity level after 95.2 ± 45.5 days while patients in the quadriceps tendon group needed 82.1 ± 45.6 days.
Conclusion: Quadriceps and hamstring tendon autografts yield comparably good results in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Hamstring tendon; Knee; Quadriceps tendon.
Year of publishing
2021
Objective: To determine if anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon (QT) could achieve faster postoperative recovery compared with hamstring tendon (HT) ACL reconstruction.
Methods: Thirty-seven QT patients were matched for gender, age and preinjury activity level with 74 HT patients. A 6-month postoperative assessment included standardised reported outcome measures: patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (International Knee Documentation Committee-subjective knee evaluation form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-knee related quality of life subscale, ACL-Return to Sport after Injury scale, Marx activity scale, anterior knee pain), range of motion (active, standing and passive), anterior knee laxity testing, hop tests (single and triple crossover hop for distance) and isokinetic strength testing of the knee extensors and flexors. T-tests or Mann Whitney U tests were used to compare data between groups.
Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups for any of the PROMs. The HT group had reduced active and standing knee flexion range compared with the QT group (p<0.001). Isokinetic strength testing showed significant deficits in limb symmetry indices for both concentric hamstring peak torque at 60°/s (p<0.001) and 180°/s (p=0.01) in the HT group. There were significantly greater deficits in limb symmetry indices for concentric quadriceps peak torque at 60°/s (p<0.001) and 180°/s (p=0.001) in the QT group.
Conclusion: The QT graft does not appear to offer a more rapid recovery in terms of knee symptoms or function which could have allowed for faster progression to the dynamic phases of rehabilitation.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Keywords: autografts; knee; reconstructive surgical procedures.
Year of publishing
2021
Purpose: To evaluate trends in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R), with emphasis on intra-articular findings, grafts, and concurrent procedures. It was hypothesized that revision ACL-Rs over time show a trend toward increased complexity with increased use of autografts over allografts.
Methods: This was a two-center retrospective study including patients undergoing revision ACL-R between 2010 and 2020. Demographic and surgical data including intra-articular findings and concurrent procedures were collected and compared for the time periods 2010-2014 and 2015-2020. All collected variables were compared between three pre-defined age groups (< 20 years, 20-30 years, > 30 years), right and left knees, and males and females. A time series analysis was performed to assess trends in revision ACL-R.
Results: This study included 260 patients with a mean age of 26.2 ± 9.4 years at the time of the most recent revision ACL-R, representing the first, second, third, and fourth revision ACL-R for 214 (82%), 35 (14%), 10 (4%), and 1 (< 1%) patients, respectively. Patients age > 30 years showed a significantly longer mean time from primary ACL-R to most recent revision ACL-R (11.1 years), compared to patients age < 20 years (2.2 years, p < 0.001) and age 20-30 years (5.5 years, p < 0.05). Quadriceps tendon autograft was used significantly more often in 2015-2020 compared to 2010-2014 (49% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). A high rate of concurrently performed procedures including meniscal repairs (45%), lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET; 31%), osteotomies (13%), and meniscal allograft transplantations (11%) was shown. Concurrent LET was associated with intact cartilage and severely abnormal preoperative knee laxity and showed a statistically significant and linear increase over time (p < 0.05). Intact cartilage (41%, p < 0.05), concurrent medial meniscal repairs (39%, p < 0.05), and LET (35%, non-significant) were most frequently observed in patients aged < 20 years.
Conclusion: Quadriceps tendon autograft and concurrent LET are becoming increasingly popular in revision ACL-R. Intact cartilage and severely abnormal preoperative knee laxity represent indications for LET in revision ACL-R. The high rate of concurrent procedures observed demonstrates the high surgical demands of revision ACL-R.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Keywords: ACL; Allograft; Anterior cruciate ligament; Lateral extra-articular tenodesis; Quadriceps tendon; Revision.
Year of publishing
2021
Objectives: To examine knee flexion range-of-motion, quadriceps strength, and knee self-efficacy trajectory curves over 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), stratified by patients' Month-6 sports activity level.
Design: Prospective longitudinal study.
Setting: Hospital outpatient physiotherapy department.
Participants: 595 individuals after unilateral ACLR (mean age, 27 years).
Main outcome measures: At 2-, 3-, and 6-months post-surgery, knee flexion range-of-motion, quadriceps strength, and self-efficacy were quantified. Flexion range-of-motion was additionally measured at 2- and 4-weeks post-surgery. Sports activity levels were assessed using the Tegner Activity Score at 6-months post ACLR.
Results: The various measures improved nonlinearly over time, with substantial improvements observed in the first 2-4 months post-surgery. In multivariable generalized least squares models, greater knee flexion range-of-motion, quadriceps strength, and self-efficacy over time were significantly associated with higher Month-6 Tegner levels (all P values < 0.01). Additionally, receiving a bone-patellar-tendon-bone graft or meniscal repair was associated with lower quadriceps strength trajectories (P-values<0.001) while female sex was associated with lower knee self-efficacy trajectories (P = 0.02).
Conclusions: Greater knee flexion range-of-motion, quadriceps strength, and self-efficacy were associated with higher Month-6 Tegner levels. The derived trajectory curves may be useful for effective management decision making and adequate results interpretation during the rehabilitation process.
Keywords: ACL; Psychosocial factors; Quadriceps; knee.
Year of publishing
2021
Purpose: To examine existing literature on objective and patient-reported outcomes and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with bone-quadriceps-tendon (B-QT) or soft tissue-quadriceps tendon (S-QT) to further clarify the role of graft type in primary ACLR.
Methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Medline were searched in October 2019 for English-language, human studies of all evidence levels on patients undergoing primary ACLR with B-QT or S-QT autograft.
Results: 24 of 1,381 studies satisfied criteria, with 20 using B-QT (1,534 patients, mean age 29.6 years [range 14 to 59], mean follow-up 41.2 months [range 12 to 120]) and 5 using S-QT (181 patients, mean age 32.4 years [range 15 to 58), mean follow-up 25.5 months [range 12 to 46]). International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were 67.3 to 89.5 with B-QT and 80.4 to 81.6 with S-QT. Lysholm scores were 85.7 to 97.4 with B-QT and 81.6 to 89.2 with S-QT. More B-QT patients demonstrated rotatory laxity on pivot shift compared with S-QT (0% to 39% versus 0%, respectively). The most common complication was graft rupture, and no differences were observed between graft choices (B-QT 0% to 9% versus S-QT 0% to 3.8%).
Conclusions: The main findings from this review report that more B-QT patients demonstrated postoperative rotatory instability than S-QT patients, and that there are no differences in graft rupture between the 2 graft choices. Although statistical conclusions may not be drawn because of heterogeneity in reporting, it appears that the B-QT group featured much wider major and minor complication profiles.
Level of evidence: IV, systematic review of level I-IV studies.
Year of publishing
2021
Purpose: To compare patient reported outcomes and functional knee recovery following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using either a quadriceps tendon (QT) or hamstring tendon (HT) autograft.
Methods: Thirty-five QT patients (age 20; range 15-34 years) participated in this study and were matched for gender, age and pre-injury activity level to 70 HT (age 20; range 15-32 years) patients. The following assessments were performed at 6 and 12 months post-operatively; standardized patient-reported outcome measures (IKDC, KOOS-QOL, ACL-RSI, Marx activity, anterior knee pain), knee range of motion (passive and active), anterior knee laxity, hop tests (single and triple crossover hop for distance), and isokinetic strength of the knee extensors and flexors. All dependent variables were analysed using a two-way mixed ANOVA model, with within (Time; 6 and 12 months) and between-subject (Graft; QT and HT) factors.
Results: Patient reported outcome measures and hop performance improved between 6 and 12 months (p < 0.001), however no significant differences in either patient-reported outcomes or hop performance were found between the two grafts. Isokinetic strength testing showed both groups improved their peak knee extensor strength in the operated limb between 6 and 12 months (p < 0.001), but the QT group had significantly lower knee extensor strength symmetry at both time points compared to HT at 60 deg/s (p < 0.001) and 180 deg/s (p < 0.01). In contrast, the QT group had significantly greater knee flexor strength symmetry at both time points compared to HT at 60 deg/s (p < 0.01) and 180 deg/s (p = 0.01), but knee flexor strength limb symmetry did not significantly improve over time in either group.
Conclusion: Recovery of knee function following either QT or HT ACL reconstruction continues between 6 and 12 months after surgery. However, knee extensor strength deficits in the QT group and knee flexor strength deficits in the HT persisted at 12 months. This may have implications for decisions regarding return to sport.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Knee; Quadriceps tendon autograft.
Year of publishing
2021
Purpose: Compare side-to-side differences for knee kinematics between anatomic single-bundle (SB) and anatomic double-bundle (DB) ACLR during downhill running at 6 and 24 months post ACLR using high-accuracy dynamic stereo X-ray imaging. It was hypothesized that anatomic DB ACLR would better restore tibio-femoral kinematics compared to SB ACLR, based on comparison to the contralateral, uninjured knee.
Methods: Active individuals between 14 and 50 years of age that presented within 12 months of injury were eligible to participate. Individuals with prior injury or surgery of either knee, greater than a grade 1 concomitant knee ligament injury, or ACL insertion sites less than 14 mm or greater than 18 mm were excluded. Subjects were randomized to undergo SB or DB ACLR with a 10 mm-wide quadriceps tendon autograft harvested with a patellar bone block and were followed for 24 months. Dynamic knee function was assessed during treadmill downhill running using a dynamic stereo X-ray tracking system at 6 and 24 months after surgery. Three-dimensional tibio-femoral kinematics were calculated and compared between limbs (ACLR and uninjured contralateral) at each time point.
Results: Fifty-seven subjects were randomized (29 DB) and 2-year follow-up was attained from 51 (89.5%). No significant differences were found between SB and DB anatomic ACLR for any of the primary kinematic variables.
Conclusions: Contrary to the study hypothesis, double-bundle reconstruction did not show superior kinematic outcomes compared to the single-bundle ACLR. While neither procedure fully restored normal knee kinematics, both anatomic reconstructions were similarly effective for restoring near-normal dynamic knee function. The findings of this study indicate both SB and DB techniques can be used for patients with average size ACL insertion sites.
Level of evidence: Level I.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Anatomic double-bundle; Anatomic single-bundle; Anterior cruciate ligament; Kinematics; Randomized clinical trial.
Year of publishing
2020
Quadriceps tendon is a promising alternative graft option for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, which can be harvested with or without a bone block as well as a full or partial thickness graft. Therefore, quadriceps tendon graft could be used in primary and revision ACL reconstruction based on the requirements (tunnel size, tunnel position, etc.). The all soft tissue, partial thickness quadriceps tendon graft in detail and pitfalls of the harvest are described in the present review. After quadriceps tendon harvest, especially in soccer players, who need a strong quadriceps to strike a ball with power, the postoperative rehabilitation may need to be adapted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL); Graft; Quadriceps tendon; Reconstruction.
Year of publishing
2021
Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes, radiographic characteristics, and surgical factors between patients with single and multiple anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failures. It was hypothesized that patients experiencing multiple ACL graft failures exhibit lower patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) and a higher (steeper) posterior tibial slope (PTS) than patients with single ACL graft failure.
Methods: Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included in this retrospective cohort study. Based on the number of ACL graft failures, patients were assigned either to the group "single ACL graft failure "or" multiple ACL graft failures ". The PTS was measured on strict lateral radiographs. Validated PROs including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm Score, Tegner Activity Scale, ACL-Return to Sport after Injury Scale, and Visual Analogue Scale for pain were collected.
Results: Overall, 102 patients were included with 58 patients assigned to the single ACL graft failure group and 44 patients to the multiple ACL graft failures group. Quadriceps tendon autograft was used significantly more often (55% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) and allografts were used significantly less often (31% vs. 66%, p < 0.001) as the graft for first revision ACL reconstruction in patients with single versus multiple ACL graft failures. Patients with multiple ACL graft failures were associated with statistically significantly worse PROs (IKDC: 61.7 ± 19.3 vs. 77.4 ± 16.8, p < 0.05; Tegner Activity Scale: 4 (range, 0-7) vs. 6 (range 2-10), p < 0.05), higher PTS (12 ± 3° vs. 9 ± 3°, p < 0.001), and higher rates of subsequent surgery (73% vs. 14%, p < 0.001) and complications (45% vs. 17%, p < 0.05) than patients with single ACL graft failure.
Conclusion: Compared to single ACL graft failure in this study multiple ACL graft failures were associated with worse PROs, higher PTS, and allograft use. During the first revision ACL reconstruction, it is recommended to avoid the use of allografts and to consider slope-reducing osteotomies to avoid multiple ACL graft failures and improve PROs.
Level of evidence: Level 3.
Keywords: ACL; Allograft; Anterior cruciate ligament; Failure; Quadriceps tendon; Revision; Tibial slope.
Year of publishing
2020
Objective: We performed a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using either quadriceps tendon graft (QT) or semitendinosus/gracilis hamstring (STG) graft. We compared subjective outcome (primary outcome) and knee stability, donor site morbidity and function (secondary outcomes).
Methods: From 2013 to 2015, we included 99 adults with isolated ACL injuries in the RCT. Fifty patients were randomised to QT grafts and 49 to STG grafts and followed for 2 years. Patient evaluated outcomes were performed by subjective International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Kujala and Tegner activity scores. Knee laxity was measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer. Donor site morbidity was evaluated by the 'donor site-related functional problems following ACLR score'. One-leg hop test tested limp strength symmetry.
Results: At 2-year follow-up, there was no difference between the two graft groups regarding subjective patient outcome, knee stability and reoperations. Also, at 2 years, donor site symptoms were present in 27% of patients in the QT group and 50% of patients in the STG group. The donor site morbidity score was 14 and 22 for the QT and STG, respectively. Hop test demonstrated lower limp symmetry for QT graft than STG graft of 91% and 97% respectively.
Conclusion: QT graft for ACLR did not result in inferior subjective outcome compared with STG graft. However, QT graft was associated with lower donor site morbidity than STG grafts but resulted in more quadriceps muscle strength deficiency than hamstring grafts. Both graft types had similar knee stability outcome.
Trial registration number: NCT02173483.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; clinical outcomes; hamstring tendon; quadriceps tendon.
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: Quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft ACL reconstruction was hypothesized to possess less anterior knee laxity, pivot shift laxity, and lower failure rates than hamstring tendon (HT) autografts.
Methods: Terms "hamstring tendon autograft" and "ACL reconstruction" or "quadriceps tendon autograft" and "ACL reconstruction" were searched in Embase and PubMed. Inclusion criteria required that studies included patients treated for primary ACL injury with reconstruction using either a QT autograft (Group 1) or a HT autograft (Group 2) and instrumented anterior knee laxity assessment. Extracted information included surgical fixation method, graft type, graft thickness or diameter, single vs. double bundle surgical method, publication year, time between the index knee injury and surgery, % women, initial and final subject number, subject age, follow-up length, side-to-side anterior knee laxity difference, Lysholm Score, Subjective IKDC score, anterior knee laxity side-to-side difference grade, ipsilateral pivot shift laxity grade, and failure rate. The Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies was used to evaluate study methodological quality.
Results: The QT group (Group 1) had 17 studies and the HT group (Group 2) had 61 studies. Overall, Group 2 had greater pivot shift laxity (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.59, p = 0.005). Group 2 suspensory femoral fixation had greater pivot shift laxity (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.01-1.58, p = 0.02) than Group 1 compression femoral fixation. Group 2 compression femoral fixation also had more anterior knee laxity (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.52, p = 0.01) than Group 1 compression femoral fixation and higher failure rates based on initial (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.4, p = 0.002) and final (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.32-2.71, p = 0.0003) subject number. Failure rate for HT compression femoral fixation was greater than suspensory femoral fixation based on initial (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.52-2.84, p < 0.0001) and final (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.63-3.16, p < 0.0001) subject number.
Conclusions: Overall, QT autografts had less pivot shift laxity and lower failure rates based on final subject number than HT autografts. Compression QT autograft femoral fixation had lower pivot shift laxity than suspensory HT autograft femoral fixation. Compression QT autograft femoral fixation had less anterior knee laxity and lower failure rates than compression HT autograft femoral fixation. Suspensory HT autograft femoral fixation had lower failure rates than compression HT autograft femoral fixation. Greater knee laxity and failure rates may be related to a combination of HT autograft diameter and configuration (tissue quality and dimensions, strands, bundles, and suturing method) variability and fixation mode.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Laxity; Patient outcome; Reconstruction.
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: To compare the active joint position sense (JPS), muscle strength, and knee functions in individuals who had anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft, hamstring tendon autograft, tibialis anterior allograft and healthy individuals. It was hypothesized that when compared to an age and gender-matched healthy control group, subjects who were post-ACL reconstruction would display impaired active joint position sense, knee extensor and flexor strength symmetry and knee function at 1 year post-surgery. A secondary hypothesis was that differences would exist between the quadriceps tendon autograft, hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior allograft groups.
Methods: Sixty-seven patients with ACL reconstruction and 20 healthy individuals were included. Active JPS reproduction was measured at 15°, 45° and 75° of knee flexion. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score and one-leg hop test were used to assess the functional status of the patients.
Results: The JPS detection was different at the 15° target angle between groups (F3.86 = 24.56, p < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of quadriceps tendon autograft group patients failed to identify the 15° active JPS assessment position compared to the other groups (p < 0.0001). The quadriceps index was lower in patients compared to healthy individuals (p < 0.001), while the hamstring index was similar (n.s.). The knee functional outcomes were similar between ACL reconstructed groups and healthy controls (n.s.).
Conclusion: Knee proprioception deficits and impaired muscle strength were evident among patients at a mean 13.5 months post-ACL reconstruction compared with healthy controls. Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon autograft may be more likely to actively over-estimate knee position near terminal extension. Physiotherapists may need to focus greater attention on terminal knee extension proprioceptive awareness among this patient group.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Hamstring tendon autograft; Proprioception; Quadriceps tendon autograft; Tibialis anterior tendon allograft.
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: Various grafts were selected for restoring knee stability and regaining pre-injury activity levels after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. This review aimed to compare the short-term knee outcomes of different tendon grafts for primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR).
Methods: Databases of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were retrieved for identifying the published RCT comparing the short-term (≤ 2 years) knee outcomes of different tendon grafts for ACLR. The main outcomes include the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and objective scores, side-to-side difference on knee laxity, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Lysholm score, Tegner score, all recorded complications and graft re-ruptures.
Results: A total of 32 trials involving 2962 patients and 17 grafts were included. Superior IKDC subjective score was found for quadriceps tendon autograft (QTB) when compared with autografts including bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), four-strand hamstring tendon (4S-HT), and double-bundle HT. The 4S-HT autograft was associated with poorer anteroposterior and rotational knee stability than the BPTB autograft. Artificial ligament also was found to provide lower knee stability compared with the autografts including the BPTB, patellar tendon, 4S-HT, 4S-HT with preserved tibial insertion, 6S-HT, and four-strand semitendinosus tendon. Additionally, the BPTB allograft showed a statistically higher knee laxity than 6S-HT allograft, while no difference was found between the genuine autografts and non-irradiated allografts.
Conclusions: QTB was recommended to be used even over the BPTB and 4S-HT autografts. BPTB autograft was more effective on restoring the knee stability than 4S-HT autograft. Non-irradiated allografts could be safely used as alternatives to autografts. However, artificial ligaments were not recommended for primary ACLR for significantly increased risk of knee laxity.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Artificial ligament; Knee function; Knee stability; Tendon allograft; Tendon autograft.
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: Restoration of knee muscle strength is associated with better outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but little is known about the outcome of strength following quadriceps tendon autograft (QT) ACL reconstruction in relation to other graft types. The aim of this review was to evaluate strength outcomes of the knee extensors and knee flexors following QT ACL reconstruction compared to (1) the non-reconstructed contralateral limb and (2) alternative ACL graft types.
Methods: Four electronic databases were searched up until 21st February 2020. Summary meta-analyses were performed comparing knee strength outcomes following QT ACL reconstruction to the contralateral limb by way of limb symmetry index (LSI). Comparative meta-analyses were performed comparing QT ACL reconstruction to alternative ACL grafts for the two most frequently reported strength outcome measures which were peak knee extensor torque LSI, and peak knee flexor torque LSI at the following post-operative periods: 3, 5-8, 9-15, 24, 36-60 months.
Results: In total, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. Knee strength outcomes of 952 QT ACL reconstructions were included and compared to either the contralateral limb or 1 of 4 alternative ACL graft types; 245 hamstring tendon autograft (HT), 143 patellar tendon autograft (PT), 45 quadriceps tendon allograft, and 21 tibialis anterior allograft. Knee extensor strength LSI following QT ACL reconstruction did not reach 90% even at 24 months post-operatively. Conversely, knee flexor strength LSI following QT ACL reconstruction exceeded 90% at the 9-15 months post-operative period. Knee extensor strength at 5-8 months following QT ACL reconstruction appears similar to PT but weaker than HT ACL reconstruction. In addition, peak knee flexor LSI was significantly greater at 5-8 months in QT ACL reconstruction patients compared to HT patients.
Conclusion: The decision to utilize a QT graft for ACL reconstruction should include consideration of strength outcomes. Knee extensor strength recovery following QT ACL reconstruction appears not to be restored before 24 months.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Year of publishing
2020
Introduction: The use of quadriceps tendon-patellar bone (QTB) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is gaining momentum. Yet, long-term results that compare this procedure with established methods are lacking. The aim of this study was to report and compare long-term results of ACL reconstruction using QTB autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts, both anchored using a hardware-free press-fit fixation technique.
Materials and methods: 60 athletes (Tegner score ≥6) with primary ACL rupture were prospectively randomized into two groups. 56 patients were evaluated after a mean duration of 12.2 ± 1.9 months (range 10-14) and 43 patients after 10.3 ± 0.2 years (range 10-11).
Results: On final follow-up, 90% of patients scored very good and good results in the functional Lysholm score (mean 99 ± 7.1, range 74-100 points). Normal or almost normal IKDC score was reported by 84% of the patients (mean 97 ± 9.5, range 60-100 points). The activity level decreased in the Tegner score from median of 7 before injury to 6 after 10 years. The KT-1000 arthrometer showed a difference in the anterior translation of less than 3 mm (mean 1.0 ± 1.2, range - 1 to 5 mm) in 91% of the patients. Significant degeneration was radiologically detected in one patient per group. No tunnel widening was seen in any patient. Up to 97% of all patients were satisfied with the operative procedure. No significant differences were found in the mentioned parameters between the two groups and also in comparison with the 1-year results. The only significant difference was in the donor site morbidity. Significantly more patients in the BPTB group had complaints during kneeling both at 1 (p < 0.001) and 10 years (p = 0.019). Squatting was also subjectively more problematic in the BPTB group than in the QTB group both after 1 (p = 0.003) and 10 years (p = 0.046).
Conclusions: This study shows equally good functional, clinical and radiological long-term results for both hardware-free methods of ACL reconstruction. These results clinically confirm the safety of press-fit anchoring after 10 years. The failure rate in this study was very low, with only one re-rupture in 10 years. The increased donor site morbidity when using the BPTB autograft compared to the QTB autograft supports already reported data. It was also seen in this study for the implant-free press-fit techniques.
Study design: Prospective and randomized, level of evidence 2.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Athletes; Patellar tendon; Press-fit fixation; Quadriceps autograft.
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: The quadriceps tendon (QT) has recently gained interest as an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) autograft. There is a paucity of data from large cohort studies on failures and revision rates after ACLR using the QT graft. The purpose of the present study is to use the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry (DKRR) to compare revision rates, objective knee stability and subjective clinical outcomes in patients who have undergone ACLR with QT, hamstring tendon (HT), and patellar tendon (PT) as a graft for ACLR. It was hypothesized that QT autografts would result in similar objective knee stability and revision rates as HT and PT autografts.
Methods: Data on primary ACLRs in the DKRR from 2005 through 2017 were analyzed. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS), Tegner activity scale scores, sagittal knee laxity, pivot-shift tests at 1-year follow-up and revision rates at 2-year follow-up were compared for the three autograft cohorts.
Results: A total of 531 QT, 14,213 HT and 1835 PT ACLR were registered in the DKLR between 2005 and 2017. QT autograft was associated with statistically significant increased laxity (1.8 mm) compared to HT autograft (1.5 mm) (p < 0.001) and more positive pivot shift. There was a significant higher revision rate for QT (4.7%), compared to PT (1.5%) and HT (2.3%) autografts at 2-year follow-up (p < 0.002).
Conclusion: Quadriceps tendon autografts for ACLR was associated with higher revision rates than HT and PT grafts. QT graft was also associated with small increased objective knee laxity and more positive pivot shift than HT and PT grafts.
Level of evidence: III.
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) using an All-Inside Full Thickness Quadriceps Reconstruction technique at 5 years follow up.
Methods: This is a Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. Inclusion criteria for this report were isolated primary ACL reconstructions without chondral lesions (Grade III/IV Outerbridge), using autologous full-thickness quadriceps tendon (FQT) graft with bone block, with an "all-inside" technique. Functional scales of Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner and objective results of side to side difference (KT1000) were used for this evaluation. Additionally, complications and comorbidities were also analyzed.
Results: Two hundred and ninety-one ACL reconstructions were retrospectively reviewed at 5 years postoperatively; 268 (92.1%) were men and 23 (7.90%) women. Lysholm Score improved from 64 (SD = 6.09) to 91 (SD = 6.05) points average. IKDC showed 59.79%, excellent and 3.4% good results. Arthrometric analysis showed that 259 knees (89%) had a difference of less than 3 mm. Median pre-injury Tegner score was 9 (Range 4-10), while final median Tegner activity level at 5 years was 8 (Range 4-10). Among comorbidities, 5.15% of the patients presented anterior knee pain. No visualization difficulties or significant hematomas were found.
Conclusion: Use of all inside FQT for ACL reconstruction in a young, high demand sports population, present at 5 years, good to excellent results, functionally and objectively, with low rates of complications and comorbidities.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; All inside; Quad tendon.
Year of publishing
2020
This review is aimed to compare suspensory and aperture quadriceps tendon autograft femoral and tibial fixations in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R), and the clinical outcomes and complication profiles of each fixation method. Greater understanding of the optimal graft fixation technique for quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts may assist surgeons in improving outcomes after ACL-R. PubMed, Embase, and Medline were searched from database inception to September 2017, and again to July 2018, and identified 3,670 articles, 21 studies of which satisfied inclusion/exclusion criteria. Across included studies, 1,155 QT ACL-R patients (mean age, 28.7 years [range, 15-59 years], with mean postoperative follow-up of 36.1 months [range, 3.4-120 months]), were analyzed. Suspensory fixation on both sides demonstrated a higher percentage of patients (81.7%) achieving the highest rating of "A or B" on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee ligament examination form compared with aperture fixation on both sides (67.7%). Moreover, suspensory fixation had a lower side-to-side difference in anterior laxity (1.6 mm) when compared with aperture fixation (2.3 mm). Among studies which reported graft failure, all of which employed aperture fixation, the rate was 3.2%. Across available data, primary ACL-R using QT grafts appears to have successful short-term outcomes with a short-term graft failure rate of 3% independent of fixation method. While there is limited data regarding the comparison of aperture and suspensory soft-tissue quadriceps tendon (SQT) fixation in ACL-R, the findings of this systematic review suggest that suspensory fixation and aperture fixation in both the femoral and tibial tunnels are equally efficacious based on clinical outcome data on IKDC grade and measured laxity. This is a level IV, systematic review study.
Year of publishing
2020
Significant controversy exists regarding the optimal surgical technique for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in adolescents with 1 to 3 years of skeletal growth remaining. Graft choice and physeal injury remain primary concerns given significantly elevated rates of failure of hamstring autograft reconstructions in this population, as well as risks of leg-length discrepancy and growth axis deviation. Traditional (more vertical) transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel can reduce risks of physeal injury but has been shown to have less accuracy in restoring the native femoral ACL footprint and associated incomplete knee stabilization. On the other hand, anteromedial and outside-in drilling yields improvements in the tunnel location and biomechanics but at the cost of a more oblique trajectory and greater risk of physeal injury. A hybrid transtibial pin technique using a Pathfinder guide facilitates femoral drilling with the "best of both worlds," allowing for reproduction of the native ACL footprint and a more physeal-respecting femoral tunnel. When combined with an all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft and suspensory fixation, the hybrid transtibial method yields a reliable, safe, and robust construct with promising results for the young athlete. We describe our preferred graft harvest, tunnel drilling, and fixation techniques to minimize physeal risks and optimize outcomes.
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: Recent registry data have demonstrated a higher revision rate of quadriceps tendon (QT) graft compared with hamstring tendon (HT) and patellar tendon (PT) grafts. Clinic routines could be an important factor for revision outcomes. The purpose of this study is to use the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry (DKRR) to compare revision rates in patients who have undergone ACLR with QT, HT and PT grafts related to individual clinic surgical routine.
Methods: Data on primary ACLRs entered in the DKRR from 2012 through 2019 were analysed since QT graft usage started in 2012. Revision rates for QT, HT and PT grafts were compared according to clinic activity (0-100 and > 100 procedures). Revision rates for the three autograft cohorts are presented, as well as adjusted revision hazard rates. Instrumented knee stability and pivot-shift tests were performed at a one-year follow-up.
Result: QT revision rate (6.4%) for low-activity clinics was higher than for high-activity clinics (2.9%) (p = 0.003). The adjusted revision hazard ratio for low-activity clinics was 2.3 (p = 0.01). QT autograft was associated with statistically significant, increased side-to-side laxity at follow-up (1.4 mm) compared with HT and PT autografts (1.0 mm) (p < 0.01), as well as an increased positive pivot-shift rate.
Conclusion: QT autografts for ACLR were associated with higher revision rates in clinics with lower than 100 procedures performed from 2012 to 2019. QT graft usage is not associated with a high revision rate when routinely performed. Learning curve is an important factor when introducing QT ACLR.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Clinical outcomes; Hamstring tendon; Patellar tendon; Quadriceps tendon.
Year of publishing
2020
Background: One of the most common grafts used to repair anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is the hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. However, another proposed option to repair the ACL is the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft. This study aimed to compare the pain and clinical results between patients with ACL injury treated with QT autograft and with HT autograft.
Materials and methods: The Ethics and Investigation Committee of our institution approved the study. The patients were randomized into two groups: one group was treated with QT autograft and the other group was treated with HT autograft. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the Lysholm-Tegner score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, and visual analog scale (VAS), at 2 weeks and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Results: A total of 28 patients with a primary ACL injury were included in the study. No significant differences in VAS pain, Lysholm knee and Tegner activity scale scores, and IKDC score between the HT and QT groups were observed at any time point. All patients had favorable outcomes and significantly improved evaluation scores.
Conclusion: The patients treated with QT autograft had clinical results and post-operative pain similar to those of patients treated with HT autograft for ACL reconstruction.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament injury; Escala Lysholm-Tegner; Hamstring tendon; Isquiotibiales; Lesión de ligamento cruzado anterior; Lysholm score; Quadriceps tendon; Tendón cuádriceps.
Year of publishing
2020
Background: The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in the adolescent population is increasing. The quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft (QPA) has been established as a reliable graft choice for ACL reconstruction in the adult population.
Purpose: To investigate graft failure, ability to return to sport, patient-reported functional outcomes, joint laxity, and subsequent injury among adolescent patients >2 years after primary ACL reconstruction with the QPA.
Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent QPA ACL reconstruction performed by a single surgeon were identified from an existing database. Information available in the database included demographics, concomitant/subsequent injuries, surgical procedures, graft failure, return to sport, and Lachman examination collected by medical record review. Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC) and Lysholm scores were collected by telephone or during a clinic visit >2 years postoperatively.
Results: The final cohort included 81 of 104 consecutive adolescent patients aged 10 to 18 years (mean ± SD, 15.9 ± 1.7 years at the time of surgery) for whom follow-up information was collected at >2 years after surgery. The cumulative incidence of graft failure within the 36-month follow-up period was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-11.4%). The rate of ipsilateral non-ACL injuries was similar (1.2%; 95% CI, 0.2%-7.6%). Contralateral ACL and non-ACL injuries requiring surgical intervention were documented in 9.8% (95% CI, 4.9%-19.5%). The median Pedi-IKDC score was 94 (interquartile range, 89-98). The median Lysholm score was 99.5 (interquartile range, 89.0-100.0). At 36 months after surgery, 87.9% (95% CI, 81.4%-94.9%) of individuals had returned to play.
Conclusion: The quadriceps tendon-patellar autograft is a novel graft that demonstrates excellent stability and favorable patient-reported outcomes. Based on these results, the QPA is a reliable choice for primary ACL reconstruction in adolescent patients.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; anterior cruciate ligament; pediatrics; quadriceps tendon–patellar autograft.
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: Comparing scar cosmesis and regional hypoesthesia at the incision site between quadriceps tendon (QT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Methods: Ninety patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with QT, HT or BPTB were evaluated at 1-year post-op. Scar cosmesis was assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) and length of the incision. Sensory outcome was analyzed by calculating the area of hypoesthesia around the scar. The classical ACL reconstruction functional follow-up was measured using the Lysholm score and KOOS.
Results: Concerning QT versus BPTB group, QT patients have a significantly lower mean POSAS (24.8 ± 6.3 vs. 39.6 ± 5.8; p < 0.0001), shorter mean incision (2.8 ± 0.4 cm vs. 6.4 ± 1.3 cm; p < 0.0001), lower extent of hypoesthesia (8.7 ± 5.1 cm2 vs. 88.2 ± 57 cm2; p < 0.0001), and better Lysholm score (90.1 ± 10.1 vs. 82.6 ± 13.5; n.s.). No significant difference was seen in KOOS (90.7 ± 7.2 vs. 88.4 ± 7.0; n.s.). Concerning QT versus HT group, no significant difference was found regarding mean POSAS score (24.8 ± 6.3 vs. 31.8 ± 6.2; n.s.), mean length of the incision (2.8 ± 0.4 cm vs. 2.5 ± 0.6 cm; n.s.), KOOS (90.7 ± 7.2 vs. 89.8 ± 8.2; n.s.) and mean Lysholm score (90.1 ± 10.1 vs. 87.8 ± 0.6; n.s.). The mean measured area of hypoesthesia was significantly higher in the HT group (70.3 ± 77.1 cm2 vs. 8.7 ± 5.1 cm2; p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Quadriceps tendon harvesting technique has the safest incision by causing less sensory loss compared to BPTB and HT. It also has the advantage of a short incision with more cosmetic scar compared to BPTB, with no difference compared to HT. However, no significant difference in terms of functional outcome was shown between the three autografts. These findings provide surgeons evidence about their clinical practice and help with graft choice decisions.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Cosmesis; Regional hypoesthesia; Sensory outcome.
Year of publishing
2020
Objective: To evaluate clinical effect of quadriceps tendon autograft and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by Meta-analysis.
Methods: From the time of building databases to May 2019, literatures on case control study on quadriceps tendon and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were searched form PubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane library, Wanfang and CNKI database. Literature screening, quality evaluation and data extraction were carried out according to include and exclude standard. Difference of forward displacement between the affected and health knee, Lachman test, axial shift test, Lysholm score, international knee documentation committee (IKDC) objective grade, anterior knee joint pain and transplant failure rate were analyzed by Meta analysis.
Results: Totally 6 literatures were included, including 915 patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 495 patients with quadriceps tendon autograft and 420 patients with bone patellar tendon bone autograft. There were no statistical differences in anterior displacement of tibia was less than 3 mm[OR=1.53, 95%CI(0.68, 3.44), P=0.31], 3 to 5 mm [OR=0.64, 95%CI(0.31, 1.35), P=0.24], greater than 5 mm[OR=1.18, 95%CI(0.33, 4.22), P=0.80], negative rate of Lachman test[OR=0.88, 95%CI(0.38, 2.02), P=0.76], negative rate of axial shift test[OR=0.63, 95%CI(0.24, 1.68), P=0.36] between two groups. There were no differences in Lyshlom score[MD=-0.56, 95%CI(-2.00, 0.89), P=0.45], IKDC objective grade A and B[OR=0.87, 95%CI (0.47, 1.60), P=0.66], and transplant failure rate [OR=0.76, 95%CI (0.28, 2.02), P= 0.58]. In reducing anterior knee pain, quadriceps tendon autograft was better than that of bone patellar tendon bone autograft [OR=0.16, 95%CI (0.09, 0.29), P<0.000 01].
Conclusion: Quadriceps tendon autograft and bone patellar tendon bone autograft on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has equal clinical and functional outcomes, transplant failure rate, quadriceps tendon autograft could reduce anterior knee pain. For patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, quadriceps tendon autograft could be seen as suitable alternative bone graft substitutes for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts; Meta-analysis; Quadriceps muscle.
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: Injury to the infra-patellar branches of the saphenous nerve (IPBSN) is the main neurological complication of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedures. A surgical technique using quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft allows a less invasive tibial approach potentially protecting the IPBSN. The aim of this study was to compare the numbness surface of the cutaneous area supplied by the IPBSN after ACL reconstruction using either hamstring tendon (HT) or QT autografts.
Methods: This was a retrospective comparative cohort study including 51 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (27 QT and 24 HT) between January 2017 and April 2018. A sensory clinical evaluation was performed on each patient: length of the tibial scar, eventual numbness surface area and the type of sensory disorder were reported. To be considered as an IPBSN lesion, the numbness area had to spread at least one centimeter away from the scar.
Results: The average follow-up was 15 months. In the HT group, the numbness area surface measured 21.2 ± 19 cm2 (0-77) and the scar length was on average 31.3 ± 5.6 mm. In the QT group, the numbness area was reduced to 5 ± 10 cm2 (P = .0007) as well as the scar length (13.3 ± 2.8 mm, P < .0001). We counted five (17.8%) and 19 (76%) real IPBSN lesions in the QT and HT groups, respectively (P = .0002). Hypoesthesia was the main sensory disorder observed (87.5%).
Conclusion: Numbness area of the cutaneous surface supplied by the IPBSN after ACL reconstruction is reduced using QT autograft compared with HT autograft.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Infra-patellar branch; Numbness; Saphenous nerve.
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: To determine and compare the incidence of postoperative septic arthritis following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (R-ACLR) with autologous quadriceps tendon (with patellar bone block) compared to autologous hamstring tendons (semitendinosus and gracilis).
Methods: A total of 1638 isolated R-ACLR with either autologous hamstring tendons (n = 1004, 61.3%) or quadriceps tendon (n = 634; 38.7%) were performed between 2004 and 2017 and were retrospectively analysed with regard to the occurrence of post-operative septic arthritis. The technique of R-ACLR did not significantly change during the years of the study. All patients received pre-op i.v.antibiotics, but no presoaking of the grafts in vancomycin was performed in the years of the study. The individual decision of graft choice was based on graft availability, tunnel position and the presence of tunnel widening. Generally, hamstring tendons were preferred. There were no clinically relevant differences between the groups regarding gender or age. Routine follow-up examination was performed 6 weeks after the index operation (follow-up rate 96.5%), and patients unsuspicious for septic arthritis at that time were classified as non-infected.
Results: Fourteen patients with septic arthritis were identified, resulting in an overall incidence of 0.85%. There was one patient with septic arthritis in the quadriceps tendon group (incidence: 0.16%) and 13 patients in the hamstring tendons group (incidence: 1.29%), respectively. The difference was significant (p = 0.013).
Conclusion: In this series, the incidence of post-operative septic arthritis after R-ACLR was lower when quadriceps tendon graft was used compared to hamstring tendon grafts.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: ACL; Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Complication; Graft; Hamstrings; Infection; Quadriceps; Revision; Septic arthritis; Tendon.
Year of publishing
2020
Background: The effects of different autograft types for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) on muscle function are sparsely investigated in randomized controlled trials. Our aim was to investigate the effects of quadriceps tendon autograft (QTB) vs. semitendinosus-gracilis autograft (StG) on thigh muscle strength and functional capacity, and a patient-reported outcome 1 year after ACL-R, and to compare the results to healthy controls.
Methods: ACL-R patients (n = 100) and matched controls (CON, n = 50) were recruited, with patients being randomly assigned to QTB (n = 50) or StG (n = 50) ACL-R. One year after ACL-R, bilateral knee extensor (KE) and flexor (KF) muscle strength (isometric, dynamic, explosive, limb symmetry index [LSI], hamstring:quadriceps ratio [HQ ratio]) were assessed by isokinetic dynamometry, along with functional capacity (single leg hop distance [SHD]) and a patient-reported outcome (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] score).
Results: KE muscle strength of the operated leg was lower (9-11%) in QTB vs. StG as was KE LSI, while KF muscle strength was lower (12-17%) in StG vs. QTB as was KF LSI. HQ ratios were lower in StG vs. QTB. Compared with the controls, KE and KF muscle strength were lower in StG (10-22%), while KE muscle strength only was lower in QTB (16-25%). Muscle strength in the StG, QTB, and CON groups was identical in the non-operated leg. While SHD and IKDC did not differ between StG and QTB, SHD in both StG and QTB was lower than CON. The IKDC scores improved significantly 1 year following ACL-R for both graft types.
Conclusion: One year after ACL-R, muscle strength is affected by autograft type, with StG leading to impairments of KE and KF muscle strength, while QTB results in more pronounced impairments of KE only. Functional capacity and patient-reported outcome were unaffected by autograft type, with the former showing impairment compared to healthy controls.
Clinical trials registration number: NCT02173483.
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of various graft options for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using network meta-analysis.
Methods: A medical literature search was conducted of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, SCOPUS, and Web of Science from their inception through March 1, 2019. The outcomes, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, Lachman test, Lysholm score, Pivot shift test, and Tegner score, were evaluated among graft options. Data extraction was carried out according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a network meta-analysis was performed using STATA 14.0.
Results: A total of 45 trials with 3992 patients were included. The forest plots revealed no significant differences in IKDC, Lysholm, or Tegner score among the grafts. In Lachman score, a significant difference was found in the comparisons of hamstring tendon allograft (HT-AL) versus patellar tendon autograft (PT-AU) and HT-AL versus hamstring tendon autograft (HT-AU). In pivot shift test, PT-AU was superior to all the other grafts, and quadriceps tendon autograft (QT-AU) was superior to HT-AL and artificial ligament (Art-L) in the number of cases with negative results. According to surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA), PT-AU had the highest probability to be the best intervention in Lachman test and Tegner score; tibialis anterior tendon allograft (TA-AL) in IKDC and Lysholm score; and QT-AU in pivot shift test. Based on the cluster analysis of SUCRA, PT-AU was considered the most appropriate intervention by IKDC and Lachman test.
Conclusion: This study suggests that PT-AU may be the most appropriate graft for ACL reconstruction according to IKDC and Lachman test results.
Level of evidence: Level I, network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: To determine and compare the incidence of postoperative septic arthritis following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (R-ACLR) with and without soaking of the graft in vancomycin solution prior to implantation in a large single-centre series.
Methods: A total of 2155 isolated R-ACLR with autologous tendons were performed from 2004 to 2019 and were reviewed with regard to the occurrence of postoperative septic arthritis. From February 2017 onwards, all grafts were wrapped in a vancomycin-soaked (5 mg/ml) gauze swab between harvest and implantation (517 patients, treatment group (2), prospectively followed). These were compared to 1638 patients before that date (control group (1), retrospectively evaluated). The technique of R-ACLR did not significantly change during the years of the study. Hamstring tendons were used in 1310 patients (60.8%) and quadriceps tendons with patellar bone block were used in 845 patients (39.2%), respectively, with no difference between the groups (n.s.). Routine follow-up examination was performed 6 weeks postoperatively (follow-up rate 96.5%), and patients with no treatment for septic arthritis until that time were classified as non-infected.
Results: There were 14 cases of postoperative septic arthritis in group 1 (incidence 0.9%), and none in group 2 (incidence 0.0%), respectively. The difference was significant (p = 0.029).
Conclusion: Soaking of the graft in vancomycin solution prior to implantation dramatically reduces the incidence of postoperative septic arthritis in R-ACLR.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: ACL; Anterior cruciate ligament; Antibiotics; Arthroscopy; Complication; Failure; Infection; Local; Prevention; Revision; Septic arthritis; Vancomycin.
Year of publishing
2021
The quadriceps tendon is gaining preference as an autograft over conventional grafts for the primary reconstruction of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments and of the medial patello-femoral ligament. In the past, the use of the quadriceps tendon was associated with considerable morbidity and less favourable outcomes compared to other grafts, specifically due to post-operative weakness of the quadriceps and other complications such as patellar fracture and rupture of the extensor apparatus. These problems are partially ascribable to the graft harvesting method used (large incision, bone block>2cm, and full-thickness tendon harvesting). Recent technical advancements have made reproducible harvesting of quadriceps grafts possible, thereby largely preventing the complications. In this study we describe an original quadriceps tendon harvesting technique in which a minimally invasive approach allows the collection of a sufficiently long graft, while sparing the deep layer of the quadriceps tendon. This technique decreases intra-operative morbidity and improves the post-operative outcomes.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Minimally invasive surgery; Quadriceps tendon.
Year of publishing
2004
Aim: The goal of this prospective randomized study was to compare the isokinetic recovery of thigh strength after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by using patellar or quadriceps tendon as graft at the 6th month follow-up.
Methods: The authors evaluated 48 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon (PT group) or quadriceps tendon (QT group) as autograft after a 6 months follow-up undergoing the following tests: the Ergojump Bosco System springboard and Universal's FITNET computerized isokinetic system.
Results: The counter movement jump (CMJ) test showed a 24% (p<0.01) strength deficit in patients operated with patellar tendon and 11% in the quadriceps tendon group. Also in the leg press test the greater differences in strength (p<0.05) were verified in the patellar tendon group, above all the peak torque (PT) test carried out at 3 repetitions (15%).
Conclusions: The strength deficit found in the subjects operated with quadriceps tendon were statistically lower in comparison to that verified in the patellar tendon group. A good recovery in thigh strength after 6 months in patients operated with quadriceps tendon could encourage the use of this kind of graft in order to achieve an easier rehabilitation and a faster release of the patient to daily and sports activity.
Year of publishing
2019
Objective: We performed a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using either quadriceps tendon graft (QT) or semitendinosus/gracilis hamstring (STG) graft. We compared subjective outcome (primary outcome) and knee stability, donor site morbidity and function (secondary outcomes).
Methods: From 2013 to 2015, we included 99 adults with isolated ACL injuries in the RCT. Fifty patients were randomised to QT grafts and 49 to STG grafts and followed for 2 years. Patient evaluated outcomes were performed by subjective International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Kujala and Tegner activity scores. Knee laxity was measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer. Donor site morbidity was evaluated by the 'donor site-related functional problems following ACLR score'. One-leg hop test tested limp strength symmetry.
Results: At 2-year follow-up, there was no difference between the two graft groups regarding subjective patient outcome, knee stability and reoperations. Also, at 2 years, donor site symptoms were present in 27% of patients in the QT group and 50% of patients in the STG group. The donor site morbidity score was 14 and 22 for the QT and STG, respectively. Hop test demonstrated lower limp symmetry for QT graft than STG graft of 91% and 97% respectively.
Conclusion: QT graft for ACLR did not result in inferior subjective outcome compared with STG graft. However, QT graft was associated with lower donor site morbidity than STG grafts but resulted in more quadriceps muscle strength deficiency than hamstring grafts. Both graft types had similar knee stability outcome.
Trial registration number: NCT02173483.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; clinical outcomes; hamstring tendon; quadriceps tendon.
Year of publishing
2021
Purpose: Compare side-to-side differences for knee kinematics between anatomic single-bundle (SB) and anatomic double-bundle (DB) ACLR during downhill running at 6 and 24 months post ACLR using high-accuracy dynamic stereo X-ray imaging. It was hypothesized that anatomic DB ACLR would better restore tibio-femoral kinematics compared to SB ACLR, based on comparison to the contralateral, uninjured knee.
Methods: Active individuals between 14 and 50 years of age that presented within 12 months of injury were eligible to participate. Individuals with prior injury or surgery of either knee, greater than a grade 1 concomitant knee ligament injury, or ACL insertion sites less than 14 mm or greater than 18 mm were excluded. Subjects were randomized to undergo SB or DB ACLR with a 10 mm-wide quadriceps tendon autograft harvested with a patellar bone block and were followed for 24 months. Dynamic knee function was assessed during treadmill downhill running using a dynamic stereo X-ray tracking system at 6 and 24 months after surgery. Three-dimensional tibio-femoral kinematics were calculated and compared between limbs (ACLR and uninjured contralateral) at each time point.
Results: Fifty-seven subjects were randomized (29 DB) and 2-year follow-up was attained from 51 (89.5%). No significant differences were found between SB and DB anatomic ACLR for any of the primary kinematic variables.
Conclusions: Contrary to the study hypothesis, double-bundle reconstruction did not show superior kinematic outcomes compared to the single-bundle ACLR. While neither procedure fully restored normal knee kinematics, both anatomic reconstructions were similarly effective for restoring near-normal dynamic knee function. The findings of this study indicate both SB and DB techniques can be used for patients with average size ACL insertion sites.
Level of evidence: Level I.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Anatomic double-bundle; Anatomic single-bundle; Anterior cruciate ligament; Kinematics; Randomized clinical trial.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: Comparing scar cosmesis and regional hypoesthesia at the incision site between quadriceps tendon (QT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Methods: Ninety patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with QT, HT or BPTB were evaluated at 1-year post-op. Scar cosmesis was assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) and length of the incision. Sensory outcome was analyzed by calculating the area of hypoesthesia around the scar. The classical ACL reconstruction functional follow-up was measured using the Lysholm score and KOOS.
Results: Concerning QT versus BPTB group, QT patients have a significantly lower mean POSAS (24.8 ± 6.3 vs. 39.6 ± 5.8; p < 0.0001), shorter mean incision (2.8 ± 0.4 cm vs. 6.4 ± 1.3 cm; p < 0.0001), lower extent of hypoesthesia (8.7 ± 5.1 cm2 vs. 88.2 ± 57 cm2; p < 0.0001), and better Lysholm score (90.1 ± 10.1 vs. 82.6 ± 13.5; n.s.). No significant difference was seen in KOOS (90.7 ± 7.2 vs. 88.4 ± 7.0; n.s.). Concerning QT versus HT group, no significant difference was found regarding mean POSAS score (24.8 ± 6.3 vs. 31.8 ± 6.2; n.s.), mean length of the incision (2.8 ± 0.4 cm vs. 2.5 ± 0.6 cm; n.s.), KOOS (90.7 ± 7.2 vs. 89.8 ± 8.2; n.s.) and mean Lysholm score (90.1 ± 10.1 vs. 87.8 ± 0.6; n.s.). The mean measured area of hypoesthesia was significantly higher in the HT group (70.3 ± 77.1 cm2 vs. 8.7 ± 5.1 cm2; p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Quadriceps tendon harvesting technique has the safest incision by causing less sensory loss compared to BPTB and HT. It also has the advantage of a short incision with more cosmetic scar compared to BPTB, with no difference compared to HT. However, no significant difference in terms of functional outcome was shown between the three autografts. These findings provide surgeons evidence about their clinical practice and help with graft choice decisions.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Cosmesis; Regional hypoesthesia; Sensory outcome.
Year of publishing
2019
Background: It is unclear what the optimal graft choice is for performing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in a skeletally immature patient.
Purpose: To evaluate outcomes and complications of skeletally immature patients undergoing transphyseal ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft versus a quadriceps tendon autograft.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Between 2012 and 2016, 90 skeletally immature patients from a single institution underwent primary transphyseal ACL reconstruction with either a quadriceps tendon autograft or a hamstring tendon autograft based on surgeon preference (n = 3). Patient demographic, injury, radiographic, and surgical variables were documented. Outcome measures included the Lysholm score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Tegner activity score, pain, satisfaction, and complications such as graft tears and physeal abnormalities.
Results: A total of 83 patients (56 hamstring tendon, 27 quadriceps tendon) were available for a minimum follow-up of 2 years or sustained graft failure. The mean age of the patients was 14.8 ± 1.4 years at the time of ACL reconstruction. No differences in chronological age, bone age, sex, patient size, or mechanism of injury were noted between groups. There were no differences in surgical variables, except that the quadriceps tendon grafts were larger than the hamstring tendon grafts (9.6 ± 0.6 mm vs 7.8 ± 0.7 mm, respectively; P < .001). Patient outcomes at a mean follow-up of 2.8 ± 0.9 years revealed no differences based on graft type, with mean Lysholm, SANE, pain, satisfaction, and Tegner scores of 96, 93, 0.6, 9.6, and 6.6, respectively, for the quadriceps tendon group and 94, 89, 0.9, 9.2, and 7.1, respectively, for the hamstring tendon group. While there were no physeal complications in either group, patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft were more likely to tear their graft (21% vs 4%, respectively; P = .037).
Conclusion: Skeletally immature patients undergoing ACL reconstruction can be successfully managed with either a quadriceps tendon autograft or a hamstring tendon autograft with good short-term outcomes, high rates of return to sport, and low rates of physeal abnormalities. The primary differences between grafts were that the quadriceps tendon grafts were larger and were associated with a lower retear rate. ACL reconstruction performed with a quadriceps tendon autograft may reduce early graft failure in skeletally immature patients.
Keywords: quadriceps tendon; skeletally immature; transphyseal ACL reconstruction.
Year of publishing
2017
Purpose: Graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is crucial, however the optimal graft source remains a topic of controversy. The purpose of this study is to compare subjective and functional patient-reported outcomes (PRO) after single-bundle ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon (QT) or hamstring tendon (HT) autografts for single-bundle ACL reconstruction. We hypothesize that there is no difference in patient-reported functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction using either HT- or QT autograft.
Methods: All data were extracted from a prospectively collected ACL registry. A total of 80 patients with at least 2-year follow-up were included in this study. A total of 40 patients with primary ACL reconstruction using a QT autograft harvested via a minimally invasive technique were matched by sex, age and pre-injury Tegner and Lysholm score to 40 patients who received HT autografts. Subjective and functional PRO scores including Lysholm score, Tegner activity level and visual analogue scale for pain were obtained at 6, 12 and 24 months after index surgery.
Results: No significant difference between the QT and the HT group was seen at any follow-up in regard to any of the PRO scores for function or pain. 24 months post-surgery the mean Tegner activity score of the HT group was significantly (p = 0.04) lower compared to the pre-injury status. At final follow-up, 27 patients (67.5%) in the QT group and 32 patients (80.0%) in the HT returned to their pre-injury activity level (n.s.). A total of 37 patients (92.5%) of the QT cohort and 35 patients (87.5%) of the HT cohort reported "good" or "excellent" results according to the Lysholm score (n.s.). "No pain" or "slight pain" during severe exertion was reported by 33 patients (82.5%) with QT autograft and 28 patients (82.4%) with HT autograft (n.s.).
Conclusion: There is no significant difference between PRO 2 years post-operative using either QT or HT autografts. Both QT and HT grafts show acceptable and comparable PRO scores making the QT a reliable graft alternative to HT for primary ACL reconstruction.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior knee pain; Hamstring tendon; Patient-reported outcome; Quadriceps tendon.
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: To determine and compare the incidence of postoperative septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with and without soaking of the graft in vancomycin solution prior to implantation in a large single-centre case series.
Methods: From 2004 to 2019, a total of 10,516 primary ACLR were performed and reviewed with regard to the occurrence of postoperative septic arthritis. From February 2017 onwards, all grafts were wrapped in a vancomycin-soaked (5 mg/ml) gauze swab between harvest and implantation (2294 patients, treatment group (2), prospectively followed). These were compared to 8222 patients before that date (control group (1), retrospectively evaluated). The technique of ACLR did not significantly change during the years of the study. There was no difference between the groups with regard to graft choice: Hamstring tendons were used in 99% and quadriceps tendons were used in 1% in both groups, respectively (n.s.). Routine follow-up examination was performed at 6 weeks (follow-up rate 97.1%) postoperatively. Patients with no treatment for septic arthritis at that time were classified as non-infected.
Results: There were 35 cases of postoperative septic arthritis in group 1 (incidence: 0.4%), and none in group 2 (incidence 0.0%), respectively. The difference was significant (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Soaking of the graft in vancomycin solution prior to implantation dramatically reduces the incidence of postoperative septic arthritis in primary ACLR and should, therefore, be used in prevention of this major complication.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: ACL; Anterior cruciate ligament; Antibiotic; Complication; Infection; Local; Presoaking; Septic arthritis; Vancomycin.
Year of publishing
2020
Purpose: To determine and compare the incidence of post-operative septic arthritis following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (R-ACLR) with autologous quadriceps tendon (with patellar bone block) compared to autologous hamstring tendons (semitendinosus and gracilis).
Methods: A total of 1638 isolated R-ACLR with either autologous hamstring tendons (n = 1004, 61.3%) or quadriceps tendon (n = 634; 38.7%) were performed between 2004 and 2017 and were retrospectively analysed with regard to the occurrence of post-operative septic arthritis. The technique of R-ACLR did not significantly change during the years of the study. All patients received pre-op i.v.antibiotics, but no presoaking of the grafts in vancomycin was performed in the years of the study. The individual decision of graft choice was based on graft availability, tunnel position and the presence of tunnel widening. Generally, hamstring tendons were preferred. There were no clinically relevant differences between the groups regarding gender or age. Routine follow-up examination was performed 6 weeks after the index operation (follow-up rate 96.5%), and patients unsuspicious for septic arthritis at that time were classified as non-infected.
Results: Fourteen patients with septic arthritis were identified, resulting in an overall incidence of 0.85%. There was one patient with septic arthritis in the quadriceps tendon group (incidence: 0.16%) and 13 patients in the hamstring tendons group (incidence: 1.29%), respectively. The difference was significant (p = 0.013).
Conclusion: In this series, the incidence of post-operative septic arthritis after R-ACLR was lower when quadriceps tendon graft was used compared to hamstring tendon grafts.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: ACL; Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Complication; Graft; Hamstrings; Infection; Quadriceps; Revision; Septic arthritis; Tendon.
Year of publishing
2019
Background: Quadriceps tendon (QT)-bone autografts used during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have provided comparable outcomes and decreased donor-site morbidity when compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts. No study has directly compared the outcomes of the all-soft tissue QT autograft with that of the BPTB autograft.
Hypothesis: Patient-reported knee outcome scores and rates of postoperative complication after primary ACL reconstruction with QT autografts are no different from BPTB autografts at a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: A total of 75 patients who underwent primary autograft ACL reconstruction with QT or BPTB autografts between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2016, at a single hospital center were contacted by telephone and asked to complete the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation, Tegner activity level scale, and Lysholm knee scoring scale. Information about the subsequent surgeries performed on the operative knee was also collected. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Fisher exact test for categorical data.
Results: Fifty patients (28 QT, 22 BPTB) completed the surveys at a mean follow-up of 33.04 months (range, 24-44 months). For the QT versus the BPTB group respectively, the median IKDC scores were 94.83 (interquartile range [IQR], 7.61) versus 94.83 (IQR, 10.92) (P = .47), the median Tegner scores were 6 (IQR, 2.5) versus 6 (IQR, 2.75) (P = .48), and the median Lysholm scores were 95 (IQR, 9) versus 95 (IQR, 13) (P = .27). Additionally, 2 QT patients and 3 BPTB patients required follow-up arthroscopy for arthrolysis (P = .64). There was 1 graft failure in the QT group requiring revision surgery.
Conclusion: There was no statistical difference in patient-reported knee outcomes or graft complication rates between the QT and BPTB autograft groups at a minimum 2-year follow-up after primary ACL reconstruction. This study highlights that the all-soft tissue QT autograft may be a suitable graft choice for primary ACL reconstruction.
Keywords: all–soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft; quad tendon anterior cruciate ligament.
Year of publishing
2019
Purpose: Quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft ACL reconstruction was hypothesized to possess less anterior knee laxity, pivot shift laxity, and lower failure rates than hamstring tendon (HT) autografts.
Methods: Terms "hamstring tendon autograft" and "ACL reconstruction" or "quadriceps tendon autograft" and "ACL reconstruction" were searched in Embase and PubMed. Inclusion criteria required that studies included patients treated for primary ACL injury with reconstruction using either a QT autograft (Group 1) or a HT autograft (Group 2) and instrumented anterior knee laxity assessment. Extracted information included surgical fixation method, graft type, graft thickness or diameter, single vs. double bundle surgical method, publication year, time between the index knee injury and surgery, % women, initial and final subject number, subject age, follow-up length, side-to-side anterior knee laxity difference, Lysholm Score, Subjective IKDC score, anterior knee laxity side-to-side difference grade, ipsilateral pivot shift laxity grade, and failure rate. The Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies was used to evaluate study methodological quality.
Results: The QT group (Group 1) had 17 studies and the HT group (Group 2) had 61 studies. Overall, Group 2 had greater pivot shift laxity (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.59, p = 0.005). Group 2 suspensory femoral fixation had greater pivot shift laxity (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.01-1.58, p = 0.02) than Group 1 compression femoral fixation. Group 2 compression femoral fixation also had more anterior knee laxity (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.52, p = 0.01) than Group 1 compression femoral fixation and higher failure rates based on initial (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.4, p = 0.002) and final (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.32-2.71, p = 0.0003) subject number. Failure rate for HT compression femoral fixation was greater than suspensory femoral fixation based on initial (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.52-2.84, p < 0.0001) and final (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.63-3.16, p < 0.0001) subject number.
Conclusions: Overall, QT autografts had less pivot shift laxity and lower failure rates based on final subject number than HT autografts. Compression QT autograft femoral fixation had lower pivot shift laxity than suspensory HT autograft femoral fixation. Compression QT autograft femoral fixation had less anterior knee laxity and lower failure rates than compression HT autograft femoral fixation. Suspensory HT autograft femoral fixation had lower failure rates than compression HT autograft femoral fixation. Greater knee laxity and failure rates may be related to a combination of HT autograft diameter and configuration (tissue quality and dimensions, strands, bundles, and suturing method) variability and fixation mode.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Laxity; Patient outcome; Reconstruction.
Year of publishing
2019
Background: Comprehensive studies evaluating quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are lacking. The optimal choice of graft between bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), hamstring tendon (HT), and QT is still debatable.
Hypothesis: The current literature supports the use of QT as a strong autograft with good outcomes when used in ACL reconstruction.
Study design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Ovid databases to identify published articles on clinical studies relevant to ACL reconstruction with QT autograft and studies comparing QT autograft versus BPTB and HT autografts. The results of the eligible studies were analyzed in terms of instrumented laxity measurements, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Lysholm score, objective and subjective International Knee Documentation committee (IKDC) scores, donor-site pain, and graft failure.
Results: Twenty-seven clinical studies including 2856 patients with ACL reconstruction met the inclusion criteria. Comparison of 581 QT versus 514 BPTB autografts showed no significant differences in terms of instrumented mean side-to-side difference (P = .45), Lachman test (P = .76), pivot-shift test grade 0 (P = .23), pivot-shift test grade 0 or 1 (P = .85), mean Lysholm score (P = .1), mean subjective IKDC score (P = .36), or graft failure (P = .50). However, outcomes in favor of QT were found in terms of less donor-site pain (risk ratio for QT vs BPTB groups, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.18-0.36; P < .00001). Comparison of 181 QT versus 176 HT autografts showed no significant differences in terms of instrumented mean side-to-side difference (P = .75), Lachman test (P = .41), pivot-shift test grade 0 (P = .53), Lysholm score less than 84 (P = .53), mean subjective IKDC score (P = .13), donor-site pain (P = .40), or graft failure (P = .46). However, outcomes in favor of QT were found in terms of mean Lysholm score (mean difference between QT and HT groups, 3.81; 95% CI, 0.45-7.17; P = .03).
Conclusion: QT autograft had comparable clinical and functional outcomes and graft survival rate compared with BPTB and HT autografts. However, QT autograft showed significantly less harvest site pain compared with BPTB autograft and better functional outcome scores compared with HT autograft.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; bone–patellar tendon–bone; hamstring tendon; quadriceps tendon.
Year of publishing
2017
Background: The quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft is known as an effective graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and shows a similar functional outcome to the bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) in randomized controlled trials, with a lesser incidence of complications. Up until now, only 2 studies have compared QT to hamstring tendon (HT) autograft.
Hypothesis: The functional outcomes of the QT technique are at least as good as those of the HT technique, with the same morbidity.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Ninety-five patients underwent isolated ACL reconstruction between January 1 and December 31, 2012. Fifty underwent ACL reconstruction with the QT and 45 with the HT. The same surgical technique, fixation method, and postoperative protocol were used in both groups. The following parameters were evaluated: surgical revisions, functional outcome (Lysholm, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Tegner, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee), joint stability (KT-1000, Lachman, pivot shift), anterior knee pain (Shelbourne-Trumper score), and isokinetic strength. Descriptive statistics are presented for these variables using the Student t test.
Results: Eighty-six patients (45 QT, 41 HT) were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 3.6 ± 0.4 years; minimum follow-up was 3 years. There were 4 reoperations in the QT group (including 1 ACL revision) and 3 in the HT group (including 2 ACL revisions) ( P > .05). The Lysholm (89 ± 6.9 vs 83.1 ± 5.3), KOOS Symptoms (90 ± 11.2 vs 81 ± 10.3), and KOOS Sport (82 ± 11.3 vs 67 ± 12.4) scores were significantly better in the QT group than in the HT group. In terms of stability, the mean side-to-side difference was 1.1 ± 0.9 mm for the QT group and 3.1 ± 1.3 mm for the HT group based on KT-1000 measurements ( P < .005). The negative Lachman component was higher in the QT group than in the HT group (90% vs 46%, P < .005). There was a trend for the negative pivot-shift component to be higher in the QT group than in the HT group (90% vs 64%, P = .052). The Shelbourne-Trumper score was the same in both groups. There was no difference between groups in terms of isokinetic strength.
Conclusion: The use of a QT graft in ACL reconstruction leads to equal or better functional outcomes than does the use of an HT graft, without affecting morbidity.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; quadriceps tendon; sports medicine.
Year of publishing
2017
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the pain levels and analgesic consumption after single bundle ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendon autograft.
Patients and methods: A total of 48 patients scheduled for anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction were randomized into two groups: the free quadriceps tendon autograft group (24 patients) and the hamstring tendons autograft group (24 patients). A basic multimodal analgesic postoperative program was used for all patients and rescue analgesia was provided with tramadol, at pain scores over 30 on the Visual Analog Scale. The time to the first rescue analgesic, the number of doses of tramadol and pain scores were recorded. The results within the same group were compared with the Wilcoxon signed test.
Results: Supplementary analgesic drug administration proved significantly higher in the group of subjects with hamstring grafts, with a median (interquartile range) of 1 (1.3) dose, compared to the group of subjects treated with a quadriceps graft, median = 0.5 (0.1.25) (p = 0.009). A significantly higher number of subjects with a quadriceps graft did not require any supplementary analgesic drug (50%) as compared with subjects with hamstring graft (13%; Z-statistics = 3.01, p = 0.002). The percentage of subjects who required a supplementary analgesic drug was 38% higher in the HT group compared with the FQT group.
Conclusion: The use of the free quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction leads to less pain and analgesic consumption in the immediate postoperative period compared with the use of hamstrings autograft.
Level of evidence: Level I Therapeutic study.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Free quadriceps tendon; Hamstring tendons; Pain.
Year of publishing
2016
Quadriceps tendon autograft is the least utilized choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, but use is expected to increase. Harvest of the full thickness of the distal quadriceps tendon is of concern, but morbidity seems low.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2016
Background: The choice of graft type is an important factor to the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Purpose: To compare knee joint stability and functional outcomes of anatomic ACL reconstruction with double-bundle hamstring tendon (DBHT) and bone-quadriceps tendon (BQT) autografts.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Ninety-six patients underwent ACL reconstruction with either DBHT (hamstring group) or BQT autograft (quadriceps group). Each group included 48 patients who were retrospectively matched on the basis of age, sex, and body mass index; there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (all P > .05). All patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Outcome evaluations included the manual laxity test, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective evaluation, Tegner activity score, modified Lysholm score, anterior knee pain questionnaire, KT-2000 arthrometer side-to-side difference, Cybex II isokinetic testing, and tunnel position evaluation by quadrant method.
Results: Manual laxity test results were significantly improved in both groups after surgery (all P < .05). The maximum KT-2000 arthrometer side-to-side difference improved from 4.0 to 1.9 mm in the hamstring group and 3.9 to 2.1 mm in the quadriceps group (P = .65). Modified Lysholm scores in the hamstring and quadriceps groups improved from 69.4 and 70.2 to 88.4 and 92.1 (P = .30), and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective evaluation scores improved from 56.0 and 60.3 to 77.9 and 80.2 (P = .37), respectively. Tegner activity scores for the hamstring and quadriceps groups were 4.7 and 4.6 preoperatively and 4.6 and 4.7 (P = .80) at final follow-up, respectively. There were no between-group differences on postoperative anterior knee pain (P > .05 for all questionnaire categories), nor were there differences in recovered extensor muscle strength during isokinetic testing (82.9% vs 81.0% at 60 deg/s, P = .71; 85.1% vs 83.8% at 180 deg/s, P = .81). However, flexor muscle strength recovery was better in the quadriceps group (86.6% vs 92.2% at 60 deg/s, P = .22; 87.1% vs 99.6% at 180 deg/s, P = .01). There were no significant differences in tunnel positioning between the 2 groups (all P > .05).
Conclusion: Anatomic ACL reconstruction with the BQT autograft showed similar knee stability and functional outcome scores when compared with the DBHT autograft. Additionally, better flexor muscle strength recovery was found in the quadriceps group, indicating a potential advantage of the BQT autograft in ACL reconstruction.
Keywords: anatomic reconstruction; anterior cruciate ligament; bone–quadriceps tendon; double-bundle; hamstring tendon.
© 2016 The Author(s).
Year of publishing
2016
The exclusive autograft choice for medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction that has been described until today is the semitendinosus tendon. However, this has some potential disadvantages in a knee with combined MCL-anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, including weakening of the hamstring's anterior restraining action in an already ACL-injured knee and nonanatomic distal MCL graft insertion when leaving the semitendinosus insertion intact at the pes anserinus during reconstruction. Moreover, because some surgeons prefer to use the hamstring for autologous ACL reconstruction, the contralateral uninjured knee hamstring needs to be harvested as a graft source for the MCL reconstruction if autografts and not allografts are the surgeons' preference. We describe a technique for performing combined reconstruction of the MCL and ACL using ipsilateral quadriceps tendon-bone and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts. This technique of MCL reconstruction spares the hamstring tendons and benefits from the advantage provided by bone-to-bone healing on the femur with distal and proximal MCL tibial fixation that closely reproduces the native MCL tibia insertion.
Year of publishing
2016
Purpose: To evaluate the subjective outcomes, knee stability, and donor-site morbidity after revision ACL reconstruction using either autologous ipsilateral quadriceps tendon or contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis tendon.
Methods: A sample size calculation suggested that we needed 25 patients in each group to detect equality between both groups. Therefore, we evaluated 30 consecutive patients who underwent an ACL revision surgery with ipsilateral bone-quadriceps tendon grafts and 30 consecutive patients with the contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis grafts between January 2010 and December 2012. Because of follow-up and exclusion criteria, finally 51 patients were evaluated. All patients were followed prospectively for at least 2 years with KT1000 arthrometer testing and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective grading. At the 24-month follow-up, additional clinical scores were evaluated: the Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Lysholm score, assessing pain during kneeling, and anterior knee pain.
Results: The KT1000 postoperative arthrometer side-to-side difference was 2.0 ± 1.2 mm for the quadriceps group and 3.0 ± 2.9 mm for the semitendinosus-gracilis group. The difference was not statistically significant (P = .461). There was also no difference in the rate of positive pivot-shift tests between groups (P = .661). The Lysholm score was 82.5 ± 18 in the quadriceps group and 73.8 ± 19 in the semitendinosus-gracilis group. The difference was not statistically significant (P = .060). There was also no significant difference in the single KOOS subscores, assessing pain while kneeling and anterior knee pain (included in the KOOS score). No rerupture occurred during follow-up.
Conclusions: Revision ACL reconstruction using the quadriceps tendon graft showed clinical outcomes similar to those of the contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis graft in terms of knee stability and function. Thus, the bone-quadriceps tendon graft may be a good alternative to the contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis tendon graft for revision ACL reconstruction.
Level of evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2015
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report the potential differences associated with graft maturity measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between quadriceps tendon with bone block and hamstring tendon autografts 6 months after ACL reconstruction.
Methods: Twenty-six patients (15 male, 11 female; mean age 29.4 ± 17 years, range 13-46 years) who had undergone anatomic SB ACL reconstruction with either hamstring or quadriceps tendon with bone block autografts and had postoperative MRI 6 months after surgery. In 12 cases, the quadriceps tendon with bone block was used and hamstring in 14 cases. The signal/noise quotient was calculated to compare the difference between quadriceps tendon with bone block and hamstring autografts.
Results: Mean signal/noise quotient is lesser in quadriceps tendon with bone block (1.74 ± 0.39) compared with HS (2.44 ± 0.61) autografts (p = 0.020). For hamstring autograft, the distal region showed a significantly lower mean signal/noise quotient value compared with middle region, and the mean signal/noise quotient value in proximal region was the highest (distal vs middle p < 0.001; middle vs proximal p = 0.007; proximal vs distal p < 0.001). The mean signal/noise quotient of proximal region in quadriceps tendon with bone block autograft was lesser than that in hamstring. The middle region of the quadriceps tendon with bone block graft demonstrated the greatest signal/noise quotient [distal vs middle p = 0.001; middle vs proximal p = 0.027; proximal vs distal (n.s.)].
Conclusion: The maturity of quadriceps tendon with bone block was better in comparison with hamstring 6 months after anatomic SB ACL reconstruction. This study is clinically relevant in that modifying the individual rehabilitation according to the extent of graft maturity may be necessary to optimize patient function and prevent re-injury of the ACL graft.
Year of publishing
2015
All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has recently gained popularity, in part because of its bone-sparing socket preparation and reported lower pain levels after surgery. However, because this technique uses suture loops and cortical suspension buttons for graft fixation, it has mostly been limited to looped graft constructs (e.g., hamstring autograft, peroneus longus allograft). Quadriceps tendon autograft offers several advantages in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction but, until recently, has not been compatible with suture-loop and cortical suspensory fixation. We describe a technique that allows a relatively short (<75 mm) quadriceps tendon autograft (without bone block) to be used with established all-inside anatomic techniques.
Year of publishing
2014
Purpose: In August 2011, orthopaedic surgeons from more than 20 countries attended a summit on anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The summit offered a unique opportunity to discuss current concepts, approaches, and techniques in the field of ACL reconstruction among leading surgeons in the field.
Methods: Five panels (with 36 panellists) were conducted on key issues in ACL surgery: anatomic ACL reconstruction, rehabilitation and return to activity following anatomic ACL reconstruction, failure after ACL reconstruction, revision anatomic ACL reconstruction, and partial ACL injuries and ACL augmentation. Panellists' responses were secondarily collected using an online survey.
Results: Thirty-six panellists (35 surgeons and 1 physical therapist) sat on at least one panel. Of the 35 surgeons surveyed, 22 reported performing "anatomic" ACL reconstructions. The preferred graft choice was hamstring tendon autograft (53.1 %) followed by bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft (22.8 %), allograft (13.5 %), and quadriceps tendon autograft (10.6 %). Patients generally returned to play after an average of 6 months, with return to full competition after an average of 8 months. ACL reconstruction "failure" was defined by 12 surgeons as instability and pathological laxity on examination, a need for revision, and/or evidence of tear on magnetic resonance imaging. The average percentage of patients meeting the criteria for "failure" was 8.2 %.
Conclusions: These data summarize the results of five panels on anatomic ACL reconstruction. The most popular graft choice among surgeons for primary ACL reconstructions is hamstring tendon autograft, with allograft being used most frequently employed in revision cases. Nearly half of the surgeons surveyed performed both single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions depending on certain criteria. Regardless of the technique regularly employed, there was unanimous support among surgeons for the use of "anatomic" reconstructions using bony and soft tissue remnant landmarks.
Year of publishing
2014
Purpose: The purpose of this randomized controlled study was to compare knee stability, kneeling pain, harvest site pain, sensitivity loss, and subjective clinical outcome after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with either bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or quadriceps tendon-bone (QTB) autografts in a noninferiority study design.
Methods: From 2005 to 2009, a total of 51 patients were included in the present study. Inclusion criteria were isolated ACL injuries in adults. Twenty-five patients were randomized to BPTB grafts and 26 to QTB grafts. An independent examiner performed follow-up evaluations 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Anteroposterior knee laxity was measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA). Anterior knee pain was assessed clinically and by knee-walking ability. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score were used for patient-evaluated outcome.
Results: Anterior knee laxity was equal between the 2 groups with KT-1000 values of 1.1 ± 1.4 mm and 0.8 ± 1.7 mm standard deviation (SD) at follow-up in QTB and BPTB groups, respectively (P = .65), whereas positive pivot shift test results were seen less frequently (14% compared with 38%, respectively; P = .03). Anterior kneeling pain, evaluated by the knee walking ability test, was significantly less in the QTB group, with only 7% of patients grading knee walking as difficult or impossible compared with 34% in the BPTB group. At 1 and 2 years' follow-up, there was no difference between the 2 groups in subjective patient-evaluated outcome. The IKDC score was 75 ± 13 patients and 76 ± 16 SD at 1-year follow-up in QTB and BPTB groups, respectively (P = .78). At 2 years, 12 patients were lost to follow-up, resulting in 18 in the BPTB group and 21 in the QTB group.
Conclusions: The use of the QTB graft results in less kneeling pain, graft site pain, and sensitivity loss than seen with BPTB grafts; however, similar anterior knee stability and subjective outcomes are seen. The results of this study show that QTB is a viable option for ACL reconstruction.
Level of evidence: Level II, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Copyright © 2014 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2014
Background: There has been no previous study regarding graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for smoking patients.
Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction between smokers and nonsmokers and to find an optimal graft in ACL reconstruction with regard to clinical outcomes for smoking patients.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: A total of 487 patients who underwent unilateral ACL reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed. Included patients were divided into 2 groups according to their history of smoking. Group 1 was composed of patients who had never smoked (n = 322), and group 2 consisted of patients who had reported smoking before ACL reconstruction and during rehabilitation (n = 165). Additionally, each group was divided into 4 subgroups according to the selected graft type (bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft, hamstring [semitendinosus-gracilis] tendon autograft, quadriceps tendon-bone autograft, or Achilles tendon-bone allograft). Patients were assessed for knee instability with the Lachman and pivot-shift tests as well as anterior translation measured by the KT-2000 arthrometer. Functional outcomes were evaluated with the Lysholm knee score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, and IKDC objective grade.
Results: The minimum follow-up period was 24 months. At the final follow-up evaluation, there were significant mean between-group differences regarding the side-to-side difference in anterior translation (group 1, 2.15 ± 1.11 mm; group 2, 2.88 ± 1.38 mm; P < .001), Lysholm knee score (group 1, 90.25 ± 6.18; group 2, 84.79 ± 6.67; P < .001), IKDC subjective score (group 1, 89.16 ± 5.01; group 2, 83.60 ± 7.48; P < .001), and IKDC objective grade (group 1, grade A = 151, B = 130, C = 36, D = 5 patients; group 2, grade A = 48, B = 71, C = 37, D = 9 patients; P < .001). With regard to differences in outcomes between the selected grafts within each group, the Achilles tendon-bone allograft showed the worst outcomes, with statistically significant mean differences for smoking patients in the side-to-side difference in anterior translation (3.59 ± 1.26 mm), Lysholm knee score (81.05 ± 2.82), and IKDC subjective score (79.73 ± 4.29).
Conclusion: Unsatisfactory outcomes with regard to stability and functional scores were shown in the smoking group compared with the nonsmoking group. In smokers, the patients receiving an Achilles tendon-bone allograft had poorer outcomes than those with autografts. The bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft is recommendable for ACL reconstruction in a smoking patient.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; arthroscopic surgery; graft; reconstruction; risk factor; smoking.
Year of publishing
2014
Objective: Restore function of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).
Indications: Chronic functional instability with rupture of the ACL, giving way phenomena, acute rupture of the ACL with concomitant meniscus repair, rerupture of ACL graft with anatomical tunnels.
Contraindications: Local infection of the skin at the knee joint, local soft tissue damage, after rupture of the quadriceps tendon, enthesopathia of the quadriceps tendon, lack of patient compliance.
Surgical technique: Harvest quadriceps tendon graft with a bone block via a 4-5 cm long incision, starting from the middle third of the proximal patella pole without damaging the tendon fibers. Drill the femoral tunnel via a deep anteromedial portal with the knee flexed of more than 110° (tunnel diameter 0.5-1 mm smaller in diameter than bone block). Gentle tunnel preparation using dilators. In absence of an ACL stump the lateral meniscus anterior horn serves as tibial landmark. In case of revision surgery, remove graft material and implants from the tunnel. Graft fixation using press fit method in the femoral tunnel. Tibial graft fixation archieved with a resorbable interference screw and a button.
Postoperative management: Goal of the inflammatory phase (weeks 1-2) is pain and inflammation control (20 kg partial weight bearing). During the proliferative phase (weeks 2-6), load and mobility slowly increased (closed-chain exercises). During the remodeling phase (> 6 weeks), strength and coordination exercises are performed. In revision cases and in case of concomitant injuries, longer partial weight-bearing period might be necessary. Athletes should not return to competitive sports before 6-8 months.
Results: In a prospective study, 33 patients (age 16-48 years) were examined after replacement of the ACL with a quadriceps tendon graft after a minimum follow-up (FU) of 2 years (12 revision; 21 primary surgery). No post- or perioperative complications. Postoperative radiographs showed an anatomical tunnel location and no dislocation of the bone block. After 2 years the difference of a-p translation compared to the other leg was assessed by the use of KT 1000. The revision group improved from an average of 7.2 mm (pre-op) to 2.2 mm (FU). The group with primary surgery improved from 6.4 mm (pre-op) to 1.7 mm (FU). A sliding pivot shift phenomenon was detected in 2 patients in the revision group and 1 patient in the primary surgery group.
Year of publishing
2013
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate midterm clinical results of the use of two autogenous graft types.
Patients and methods: Between June 2005 and November 2010, clinical data of 44 patients who were operated were retrospectively analyzed. Quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft was used for reconstruction surgery in 23 patients (QT-PB group), while quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft was used in 21 patients (HT group). The Tegner's activity scale, Lysholm scoring system, single-leg-hop test and KT-2000 arthrometric measurements were used for data collection.
Results: The mean length of follow-up was 37.6 months. Although the mean Lysholm score increased in both groups, excellent results in HT group were two-fold higher compared to QT-PB group. The mean laxity for the operated knee joint was 5.65 mm (3.5 to 8.0 mm) in QT-PB group and 3.67 mm (3.0 to 5.5 mm) in HT group. Head-to-head analysis using KT-2000 arthrometer demonstrated that 12 patients (52.1%) in QT-PB group and two patients (9.6%) in HT group had more than 3 mm of anterior laxity difference.
Conclusion: Quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft is superior to central quadriceps tendon-patellar bone in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.
Year of publishing
2013
Introduction: Although known as a possible graft option for decades, quadriceps tendon grafts have often been termed a second-line graft option. We report a consecutive case series using this method as the primary treatment line. The rationale for this study was to evaluate the midterm results of this method in a prospective and consecutive case series. The primary study question was to determine the clinical results 24-36 months after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a bone plug-free quadriceps tendon autograft fixed with bioabsorbable cross-pins.
Materials and methods: The study population included 55 patients, of whom 24 were female (43.6%). The mean age at the index procedure was 31.7 years (15-58 years). All patients received an ACL construction using a bone block-free quadriceps tendon graft fixed with resorbable cross-pins. The postoperative regimen included partial weight-bearing for 3 weeks and flexion limited to 90° for six weeks; an orthosis was not used. The mean follow-up duration was 29.5 months (24.3-38.5 months) after the index procedure. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score and examination form was assessed, as well as the Lysholm and Gillquist score and the Tegner activity index. The Rolimeter arthrometer was used to assess the anterior laxity of the knee.
Results: Graft harvesting was possible in all cases; a bony extension was never required. On average, graft length was measured at 8.8 cm (7.5-10 cm). The mean IKDC subjective score at follow-up was 80.44 points (55.17-100 points, standard deviation [SD] 12.05). The mean preinjury Tegner activity index was 4.98 (2-7) compared to a mean value of 4.16 (2-7, SD 0.8) at follow-up. There was a mean loss of 0.82 index points. The average Lysholm and Gillquist score was 89 points (65-100, SD 17.7). Of the results, 89.1% were in the good or very good groups; in one case (1.8%), the result was poor, while the rest were fair.
Conclusion: ACL reconstruction using a bone plug-free quadriceps tendon autograft achieved satisfactory results in a midterm review.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; arthroscopic treatment; clinical case series; quadriceps tendon.
Year of publishing
2013
A multitude of graft options exist including both allograft and autograft sources for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. With recent concerns regarding the early graft failure and cost-effectiveness of allograft sources, more attention has been directed toward autograft options. However, autograft harvest has been associated with specific morbidity that can result in suboptimal outcomes. The quadriceps tendon is an excellent biomechanical and biologic option.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2013
Purpose: To determine the suitability of the quadriceps autograft in primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Methods: A systematic review was undertaken to identify all clinical studies reporting on the use of the quadriceps tendon autograft in ACL reconstructions. Studies that reported on clinical and functional outcomes, morbidity and complications were selected.
Results: Seventeen articles met our inclusion criteria with a total of 1,580 reconstructions studied. This included four comparative studies which compared the quadriceps tendon to either hamstring or patella tendon autografts. The quadriceps tendon autograft had clinical (Lachman, Pivot-shift testing) and functional outcomes (Lysholm and IKDC scores) similar to those reported for the patella tendon and hamstring grafts in the literature. Comparative studies also reported no significant difference between the grafts for any outcome measure.
Conclusions: The quadriceps tendon autograft is a promising alternative for primary ACL reconstructions with good outcomes and minimal donor site morbidity. Further studies are required, however, to determine whether the quadriceps graft is as good as or better than other autografts.
Level of evidence: IV.
Year of publishing
2012
Context: Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common surgical procedure; however, there is no consensus to what the best graft option is to replace the injured ACL. The main options available consist of allografts and autografts, which include patellar tendon, hamstring tendon, and quadriceps tendon autografts.
Evidence acquisition: The PubMed database was searched in August 2010 for English-language articles pertaining to ACL grafts.
Results: Postoperative outcome variables were analyzed to determine similarities and differences among the different graft options. These variables include stability, strength, function, return to sports, patient satisfaction, complications, and cost.
Conclusions: Both allografts and the 3 main options for autografts can provide excellent results in ACL reconstruction and lead to a high percentage of satisfied patients. However, differences exist among the graft choices. Both the similarities and the differences are important to discuss with a patient who will be undergoing ACL reconstruction so that he or she has the best information available when making a choice of graft.
Keywords: allograft; anterior cruciate ligament; autograft; reconstruction.
Year of publishing
2012
Background: This article describes an arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction technique with a quadriceps tendon autograft using an anteromedial portal technique.
Methods: A 5 cm quadriceps tendon graft is harvested with an adjacent 2 cm bone block. The femoral tunnel is created through a low anteromedial portal in its anatomical position. The tibial tunnel is created with a hollow burr, thus acquiring a free cylindrical bone block. The graft is then passed through the tibial tunnel and the bone block, customized at its tip, is tapped into the femoral tunnel through the anteromedial portal to provide press-fit fixation. The graft is tensioned distally and sutures are tied over a bone bridge at the distal end of the tibial tunnel. From the cylindrical bone block harvested from the tibia the proximal end is customized and gently tapped next to the graft tissue into the tibial tunnel to assure press fitting of the graft in the tibial tunnel. The distal part of the tibial tunnel is filled up with the remaining bone.All patients were observed in a prospective fashion with subjective and objective evaluation after 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months.
Results: Thirty patients have been evaluated at a 12 months follow-up. The technique achieved in 96.7% normal or nearly normal results for the objective IKDC. The mean subjective IKDC score was 86.1 ± 15.8. In 96.7% the Tegner score was the same as before injury or decreased one category. A negative or 1+ Lachman test was achieved in all cases. Pivot-shift test was negative or (+) glide in 86.7%. The mean side-to-side difference elevated by instrumental laxity measurement was 1.6 ± 1.1 mm. Full ROM has been achieved in 92.3%. The mean single one-leg-hop index was 91.9 ± 8.0 at the follow-up.
Conclusions: Potential advantages include minimum bone loss specifically on the femoral side and graft fixation without implants.
Year of publishing
2011
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is among the most common orthopaedic procedures in the United States, with >200,000 performed annually. Much has been published regarding the use of autograft versus allograft. Bone-patellar tendon-bone is the most frequently used autograft, but hamstring and quadriceps tendon grafts are common alternatives. Each graft has distinct advantages and disadvantages, and selection is individualized. Fixation methods vary by graft type. Fixation resulting in a construct that is too rigid may restrict knee range of motion. Donor site morbidity must be considered, as well. Autograft harvest may result in anterior knee pain, kneeling pain, anterior knee numbness, muscle weakness, and patellar fracture. Appropriate graft selection is essential to optimize outcomes.
Year of publishing
2011
The anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a common procedure that improves stability and function of the knee. The surgical technique continues to evolve and many issues are still under debate. These mainly include: (1) graft selection (patellar tendon, hamstring, quadriceps tendon, or allografts), (2) surgical technique (double versus single bundle), and (3) femoral tunnel drilling. Currently, the most controversial one is the femoral tunnel drilling (transtibial vs. anteromedial portal drilling). Common opinion is that drilling the femoral tunnel through the anteromedial (AM) allows a more anatomic placement of the graft and a better rotational stability; therefore, this technique is gaining in popularity compared with the transtibial drilling despite a greater difficulty and the risk of medial condyle damage, tunnel back wall blowout, and inadequate socket length. The aim of this article is to describe the surgical technique of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (single and double bundle), drilling the femoral tunnel through the AM portal.
Year of publishing
2011
Background: One major concern in the treatment of ACL lesions in children and adolescents with open physes is the risk of iatrogenic damage to the physes and a possibly resulting growth disturbance.
Purpose: The primary purpose of this article is to describe our technique of a transphyseal ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon-bone autograft in children and adolescents with open growth plates. The secondary aim is to report our early results in terms of postoperative growth disturbances which are considered to be a major concern in this challenging group of patients. It was our hypothesis that with our proposed technique no significant growth disturbances would occur.
Methods: From January 1997 to December 2007 49 consecutive children and adolescents with open growth plates were treated for a torn ACL using the aforementioned surgical technique. The patients (28 males and 21 females) with a median age at surgery of 13 (range 8-15) years were retrospectively evaluated. Outcome measures were follow-up radiographs (weight-bearing long leg radiographs of the injured and uninjured knee, anteroposterior and lateral views, a tangential view of the patella and a tunnel view of the injured knee) and follow-up notes (6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 months and until closing of physes) for occurrence of any tibial and/or femoral growth changes.
Results: All of the 49 patients had a sufficient clinical and radiological follow-up (minimum 5 years, rate 100%). 48 cases did not show any clinical and radiological growth disturbance. One case of growth disturbance in a 10.5 years old girl was observed. She developed a progressive valgus-flexion deformity which was attributed to a malplacement of the autograft bone block within the femoral posterolateral epiphyseal plate leading to an early localized growth stop. None of the patients were reoperated due to ACL graft failure. Five of the patients underwent revision ACL surgery due to another adequate sports trauma after the growth-stop. The tibial fixation screw had to be removed under local anaesthesia in 10 patients.
Conclusions: The described ACL reconstruction technique represents a promising alternative to previously described procedures in the treatment of children and adolescents with open growth plates. Using quadriceps tendon future graft availability is not compromised, as the most frequently used autograft-source, ipsilateral hamstring tendons, remains untouched.
Year of publishing
2010
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and operative characteristics of cyclops lesion in a consecutive series of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) double-bundle reconstruction.
Methods: Included were 387 patients who underwent an ACL double-bundle reconstruction with quadriceps or hamstring tendons and were followed up at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months for clinical examination. When a persistent extension deficit was observed 3 months postoperatively, magnetic resonance imaging was performed to eventually diagnose a cyclops syndrome, and arthroscopic removal of the nodule was performed in these cases. The aspect of the nodule was explored before debridement. These patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 12 months (minimum, 6 months; maximum, 20 months) after nodule debridement for evaluation.
Results: There were 14 patients who had cyclops syndrome (3.61%); 10 cases (5.37%) occurred in the quadriceps tendon group and 4 cases (1.99%) in the hamstring tendon group. In the postoperative period these patients had a mean loss of extension of 6° (range, 5° to 15°), and 78.6% had pain and/or swelling. At the 6-week follow-up, 78.6% of the 14 patients had a significant quadriceps dysfunction associated with an active extension deficit. During arthroscopic debridement, the cyclops lesion was always located on the roof of the intercondylar notch. At the last follow-up, 12 patients had full range of motion, but an extension loss was still present in 2 patients. On the International Knee Documentation Committee objective evaluation, 78.5% of patients were graded A, 14.3% were graded B, and 7.2% were graded C.
Conclusions: Cyclops syndrome after double-bundle ACL reconstruction was more frequently observed with quadriceps tendon graft than with hamstring graft. Its unique characteristic is that the nodule localization is from the roof of the intercondylar notch. The majority of the patients with cyclops syndrome presented with a significant quadriceps dysfunction and an active extension deficit in the immediate postoperative period.
Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2010 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2010
Tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most common ligamentous injury of the knee. Reconstructing this ligament is often required to restore functional stability of the knee. Many graft options are available for ACL reconstruction, including different autograft and allograft tissues. Autografts include bone-patellar tendon-bone composites (PT), combined semitendinosus and gracilis hamstring tendons (HT), and quadriceps tendon. Allograft options include the same types of tendons harvested from donors, in addition to Achilles and tibialis tendons. Tissue-engineered anterior cruciate grafts are not yet available for clinical use, but may become a feasible alternative in the future. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess whether one of the popular grafts (PT and HT) is preferable for reconstructing the ACL. For this objective, the authors selected only true level I studies that compared these graft choices in functional clinical outcomes, failure rates, and other objective parameters following reconstruction of the ACL. In addition, this review discusses mechanical considerations related to different allograft tissues.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2010
Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament is a well-known entity and causes anteroposterior and rotational instability of an injured knee. Rupture of the medial patellofemoral ligament is less frequent, and its insufficiency causes patellar instability. Several techniques have been described for the reconstruction of each ligament. The 2 lesions and following instabilities can coexist, and both ligaments can be reconstructed simultaneously. We report on 2 cases, 1 recreational sportswoman and 1 high-level sportswoman, with coexisting lesions treated surgically by a single-step procedure using ipsilateral graft of the quadriceps tendon for reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament. The advantage of this procedure is that there is only 1 donor site, and thus lower donor-site morbidity, while the strength of either neoligament is not sacrificed. The technique is described here.
2010 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Year of publishing
2009
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare postoperative anterior knee pain, knee stability, and functional scores of an autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft and a quadriceps tendon-bone (QTB) graft.
Methods: A total of 48 patients--27 who had anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by use of an autogenous BPTB graft and 21 who had ACL reconstruction by use of a QTB graft--were assessed at a minimum follow-up of 24 months after surgery. An accelerated rehabilitation program was adapted, and the rehabilitation protocol was identical for both groups.
Results: The mean side-to-side difference as measured with a KT-2000 arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) was 2.73 mm (SD, 1.45 mm) in the BPTB group and 2.79 mm (SD, 1.32 mm) in the QTB group (P = .880). Postoperatively, the International Knee Documentation Committee score was grade A or B in 23 patients (85.2%) in the BPTB group and 18 (85.7%) in the QTB group (P = .997). The mean anterior knee pain score was 86.9 in the BPTB group as compared with 90.2 in the QTB group (P = .107). In a kneeling posture, 13 BPTB patients reported discomfort (moderate in 10 and severe in 3) whereas only 4 QTB patients had moderate discomfort (P = .029). No significant differences were found with regard to other activities surveyed.
Conclusions: A QTB graft attached with the EndoPearl device (Linvatec, Largo, FL) appears to be an effective alternative for single-bundle ACL reconstruction. When followed with an accelerated rehabilitation program, reconstruction with a QTB graft provided knee stability comparable to a BPTB graft but with less kneeling pain than a BPTB graft.
Year of publishing
2009
Several techniques of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) double-bundle reconstruction have been introduced to improve the functional outcome and restore normal kinematics of the knee. Meanwhile, a remnant-preserving technique was developed to preserve the proprioception and to enhance the revascularization of the reconstructed ACL. We developed double-bundle ACL reconstruction technique using autogenous quadriceps tendon graft while preserving the remnant. With this technique, two femoral sockets and one tibial tunnel are made. To preserve the remnant of the ACL, the rotational direction of the reamer was set to counterclockwise just before perforation of the tibial tunnel. To pass the graft more easily without disturbance of the remnant, the graft passage was achieved through the tibial tunnel. We suggest that the remnant-preserving technique could be an effective alternative considering its mechanical stability as well as the proprioception and vascularization recovery in arthroscopic double-bundle ACL reconstruction.
Year of publishing
2009
Background: In a patient with generalized ligamentous laxity, the risk of instability is greater with a conventionally reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction done with a double-bundle technique with use of a quadriceps tendon-bone autograft and that of a single-bundle reconstruction with use of a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft in patients with generalized ligamentous laxity.
Methods: The records of sixty-one patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between June 2002 and October 2005 were evaluated. Thirty-two patients underwent a single-bundle reconstruction (group 1), and twenty-nine patients underwent a double-bundle reconstruction (group 2). Clinical outcomes were determined from data obtained before surgery and at the twenty-four-month follow-up visit.
Results: Postoperatively, the mean side-to-side difference (and standard deviation) in anterior tibial translation, measured with use of a KT-2000 arthrometer, was greater for group 1 (3.37 +/- 1.76 mm; range, 1.00 to 8.00 mm) than for group 2 (2.03 +/- 1.11 mm; range, 0.00 to 3.50 mm) (p = 0.02). Three patients in group 1 had a grade-1+ pivot shift, while no patient in group 2 had an abnormal pivot shift. The mean score on the Hospital for Special Surgery knee ligament questionnaire was 90.8 in group 1 and 92.1 in group 2, and the mean Lysholm score was 89.4 in group 1 and 91.1 in group 2.
Conclusions: On the basis of the evaluation of ligamentous laxity measured by the KT-2000 arthrometer, a double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with use of a quadriceps tendon-bone autograft allows less anterior translation than does a single-bundle reconstruction with use of a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. However, we could not identify a significant difference in the functional outcome between the two techniques.
Year of publishing
2009
Objective: Assess clinical results using two different protocols, 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery with the central third of quadriceps muscle tendon (QT).
Method: Between November /1997 and April/1998, 25 patients were submitted to 25 ACL reconstructions with QT by transtibial technique. The bone portion of the graft was fixated on femoral tunnel with interference screw and the tendinous portion of tibial tunnel with screw with washer. Two patients injured the new when playing soccer. Six patients were not available for follow-up (24%). Seventeen patients were evaluated, 15 men and two women, with mean age at surgery time of 28.53 ± 6.64 years. All patients were examined at six months, one year, and ten years after surgery. Clinical evaluation was made by the Lysholm scale, and the knee evaluation, with the Hospital for Special Surgery scale.
Results: The patients had their injuries operated after 9.87 ± 14.42 months of the accident. According to Lysholm scale, the results at the end of the first year were 98.71 ± 2.47 and, after 10 years, 97.35 ± 3.12. Using the Hospital for Special Surgery scale, the mean score was 95.07 ± 5.23 in one year, and 94.87 ± 4.16 in 10 years. All patients returned to their professional activities with the same previous status. Fifteen (88.24%) patients were able to return to their sports activities, one by modifying the practice, while another one switched to another sport. No patient complained of pain on the donor area in the medium and long term. The sports return rate was excellent, and no changes were found on the femoropatellar joint.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Knee; Muscle skeletal; Quadriceps muscle.
Year of publishing
2009
Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative outcome and functional scores after single bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with the use of quadriceps tendon autografts after a 16 (12-24) month follow-up.
Method: 54 patients (9 women, 45 men, body mass index [BMI] 25.3 [18.1-36.3 kg/m (2)]) were included in this prospective series, treated between January 2004 and December 2005. Ligament stability was assessed with the Lachmann and pivot-shift tests and a KT 1000 arthrometer. Tegner index, Lysholm-Gilquist score and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) were employed to evaluate the functional outcomes. In addition, the single leg hop test was performed.
Results: Ligament arthrometry using the KT 1000 arthrometer demonstrated a mean side-to-side difference of 1.53 mm (0.2-4.1 mm). Regarding the Lachmann test, 17 patients (32%) showed 1+ laxity and no patient had an abnormal pivot-shift. The mean Tegner activity score was 4.22 (1-10), the mean Lysholm score was 80.8 (20-100) and the mean IKDC score 68.1 (29-87). Results of the single leg hop test revealed a mean decline of the treated leg to 87.7% (70-100%) of the contralateral side. The mean extension was reduced by 1.7 degrees (0-10 degrees) on the treated knee and the flexion by 2.1 degrees (0-10 degrees), compared to the contralateral knee.
Conclusion: Single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon demonstrates highly satisfactory results. Due to a moderate donor site morbidity and preservation of the medial stabilizing structures of the knee a wider use in primary cruciate ligament reconstruction may arise in the future.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart, New York.
Year of publishing
2009
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the intermediate-term outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by use of bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), quadriceps tendon with a bone plug (BQT), and quadriceps tendon without a bone plug (QT).
Methods: We evaluated 198 primary ACL reconstructions in 191 patients at a mean of 55.6 months postoperatively. Assessment included side-to-side comparison of range of motion, arthrometer values, presence of effusion, anterior knee pain, and numbness. Comparisons were made between QT and BQT patients and between men and women. The results were compared with data from 30 patients in a previous study who had undergone ACL reconstruction by the same surgeon (W.R.S.) with BPTB.
Results: Range of motion averaged -3.2 degrees +/- 2.2 degrees of extension to 134.3 degrees +/- 10.2 degrees of flexion for the operative extremity compared with -3.6 degrees +/- 2.07 degrees to 134.2 degrees +/- 10.6 degrees for the contralateral extremity at final follow-up. KT-1000 manual maximum measurements (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) of the operative extremity averaged 0.94 mm more than those of the normal contralateral knee. When compared with BPTB autograft, the quadriceps tendon autograft showed significantly better results, with less anterior knee pain (4.56% v 26.7%), less anterior numbness (1.5% v 53.3%), a higher percentage of arthrometer measurements showing a side-to-side difference of 0 to 3 mm (88% v 68%), and better extension (mean loss, 0.55 degrees v 2.77 degrees ). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to loss of flexion, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, presence of effusion, or number of failures.
Conclusions: Central quadriceps tendon autograft, QT or BQT, produces equivalent results when compared directly with BPTB autograft in arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction. There was no difference in results between men and women with a quadriceps tendon autograft, either with or without the use of a bone plug. ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft is an effective surgical option that reduces donor-site morbidity.
Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Year of publishing
2008
The bone-patellar tendon-bone has been widely used and considered a good graft source. The quadriceps tendon was introduced as a substitute graft source for bone-patellar tendon-bone. We compared the clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using central quadriceps tendon-patellar bone and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts. We selected 72 patients who underwent unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone between 1994 and 2001 and matched for age and gender with 72 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon-patellar bone. All patients were followed up for more than 2 years. We assessed anterior laxity, knee function using the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores, and quadriceps strength, the means of which were similar in the two groups. More patients (28 or 39%) in the bone-patellar tendon-bone group reported anterior knee pain than in the quadriceps tendon-patellar bone group (six patients or 8.3%). Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the central quadriceps tendon-patellar bone graft showed clinical outcomes comparable to those of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the patellar tendon graft, with anterior knee pain being less frequent in the former. Our data suggest the quadriceps tendon can be a good alternative graft choice.
Level of evidence: Level III Therapeutic study.
Year of publishing
2008
The quadriceps tendon autograft can be used for primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Despite several successful clinical reports, graft fixation issues remain, and the ideal technique for fixation continues to be controversial. We present a technique of ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft (QTA) using a patellar bone block. The tendon end is fixed in the femoral tunnel and the bone plug in the tibial tunnel using reabsorbable interference screws. The advantages of this technique are related to the increase in stiffness of the graft, the achievement of a more anatomic fixation, and a reduction in synovial fluid leakage.
Year of publishing
2007
The use of the BPTB-autograft is a very common method for ACL reconstruction. Nevertheless, the problem of the typical donor-site-morbidity is unresolved. Recently, a transplant of quadriceps tendon, with an attached bone block (BQT) has been increasingly relied upon. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical results of a group of patients after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using either BPTB or quadriceps tendon autograft after a minimum follow-up of 2 years in terms of knee joint stability and function using both subjective and objective criteria. Retrospective study. A total of 260 patients with ACL ruptures were operated between 1995 and 2000; 124 received a BQT-autograft, including 8 revisions; 136 patients received a BPTB-autograft, exclusively primary interventions. The results were evaluated using the IKDC-, Noyes- and Lysholm-Scores. It was possible to re-evaluate 194 patients after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, 64 of 260 patients (25%) were lost to follow-up. Ninety-seven percent of the operated knee joints in the BPTB-group were judged as normal or almost normal with the IKDC evaluation, as were 83% in the BQT-group (P < or = 0.001). The BQT-group showed a significantly better result in the evaluation of the donor-site-morbidity. We found no significant differences in the functional outcome according to the Lysholm- and Noyes-Score. In comparison to the results after using a BQT-transplant for reconstruction of a ruptured ACL the use of the BPTB-transplant is in favour concerning patient satisfaction and IKDC evaluation. For patients with activities involving kneeling or prolonged flexion of the knee joint BQT-transplants can be a good alternative, however.
Year of publishing
2007
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery with the central third quadriceps tendon can yield a stable, high-functioning knee with little associated morbidity. Both the quadriceps tendon-patellar bone graft and the free tendon graft are reported to produce good to excellent outcomes at more than 2 years of follow-up. The decreased donor-site morbidity and absence of anterior knee pain suggest that the quadriceps free tendon autograft offers a reliable, pain-free, low-morbidity autograft alternative in ACL reconstruction. Recent data suggest that this graft may be the least morbid of the currently used ACL autograft reconstruction alternatives.
Year of publishing
2007
Objective: To test an intra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee in 10 human cadavers by replacing 2 anterior cruciate ligament bundles, with the purpose of producing a surrogate that would be structurally more similar to the anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and would provide the knee with more stability.
Methods: We reconstructed the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles using a quadriceps muscle tendon graft that included a patellar bone segment. The anteromedial bundle was replaced in 10 knees (5 right and 5 left knees from different cadavers) by a quadriceps-bone tendon graft, and the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles were replaced in the matching pairs of these knees. In the latter, the bone segment was fixed to the tibia, and the tendinous portion of the graft was divided longitudinally creating two 5-mm wide bundles that were inserted individually into the femur through 2 independent bone tunnels. Then, the knees were tested mechanically to evaluate the tibial anterior dislocation in relation to the femur, as well as the rigidity of the graft. The control group was formed by the knees with intact anterior cruciate ligaments, before being resected to be reconstructed.
Results: The results obtained did not show superiority of double-bundle reconstruction over single-bundle reconstruction, and neither technique provided the knee with the same stability and rigidity of the intact anterior cruciate ligament.
Conclusion: Our hypothesis, based on the anatomy and biomechanics of the knee, that reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using 2 bundles would result in a more anatomic reconstruction and provide better containment of the anterior tibial translation was not supported by the results of this study.
Year of publishing
2006
Surgical procedures for double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, which currently use hamstring graft, have been described, but some concerns remain regarding graft fixation and the ability to obtain adequate bundle size. We report an original double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique using a quadriceps tendon graft and a simplified outside-in femoral tunnel-drilling process. The graft consists of a patellar bone block with its attached tendon split into superior and inferior portions, which yields 2 bundles. The anteromedial tunnel is drilled from the outside through a small lateral incision by use of a guide. The posterolateral tunnel is made through the same incision with a specific guide engaged in the anteromedial tunnel. A single tibial tunnel is created. The graft is routed from the tibia to the femur with the bone block in the tibial tunnel and the 2 bundles in their respective femoral tunnels. After fixation of the bone block in the tibia, the 2 bundles are tensioned and secured separately in their femoral tunnels.
Year of publishing
2006
Background: The quadriceps tendon is a viable graft source for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Purpose: To determine the functional results and graft failure rates in knees in which the patellar tendon had been previously harvested or was unavailable, expanded tunnels precluded the use of a semitendinosus-gracilis graft, or patients requested autogenous tissues instead of allografts for revision reconstruction.
Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: The authors observed 21 patients for a mean of 49 months postoperatively after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon graft. The results were determined by KT-2000 arthrometer testing, the Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and the International Knee Documentation Committee Rating System. Fifteen knees required a concurrent procedure, including reconstruction of posterolateral structures in 5 knees, meniscal repairs in 5 knees, and high tibial osteotomy in 2 knees.
Results: Significant improvements occurred in symptoms (P < .0001), daily activities (P < .05), sports activities (P < .01), and the overall rating scores (P < .0001). Eighteen patients rated their knee condition as improved. Total mean anterior-posterior displacements decreased from 8.4 +/- 3.1 mm preoperatively to 2.0 +/- 2.3 mm at follow-up (P < .001). On the International Knee Documentation Committee knee ligament rating, 17 knees were graded as normal or nearly normal, 3 were graded as abnormal, and 1 was graded as severely abnormal.
Conclusion: The revision operation provided reasonable results in this group of complex knees. However, the functional and overall results were inferior to those reported for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Many knees (90%) had compounding problems of articular cartilage damage, meniscectomy, varus malalignment, or additional ligamentous injury that most likely affected the results.
Year of publishing
2006
Recently, the interest in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with double-bundle technique has increased so as to reproduce the original load distribution and kinematics of the knee. We developed an arthroscopic double-bundle ACL reconstruction technique using autogenous quadriceps tendon with 2 split grafts and a patellar bone plug. The anteromedial bundle and posterolateral bundle of the ACL are replicated with each split graft of quadriceps tendon and fixed with biodegradable interference screws on the 2 femoral tunnels. The patellar bone plug of the quadriceps tendon is fixed with a biodegradable interference screw within the 1 tibial tunnel. We suggest that our technique using quadriceps tendon may be an alternative in arthroscopic double-bundle ACL reconstruction.
Year of publishing
2006
Tears of the anterior cruciate ligament in skeletally immature patients were operated with four different methods and their outcome compared to each other. Sixty-eight patients (33 males, 35 females), mean 12.5 years, were treated in four different centers from 1984 to 2001. Twenty-eight patients underwent the ACL-reconstruction with hamstring grafts, 16 patients with bone-patella-bone autografts, 12 patients with quadriceps grafts and 12 patients with facia lata. The mean follow-up was 32 months. Postoperative evaluation included radiographs, KT-1000/2000 stability measurements, Lysholm score, The Tegner activity scale and IKDC score. Neither leg length discrepancy nor angular deformities were noted. Mean KT-1000 difference was 2.1 mm, mean postoperative Lysholm knee score 93.3, IKDC 87% normal or nearly normal. The Tegner index decreased from 6.6 to 5.7. In total, six patients developed instability due to an adequate trauma 1 year after the index operation. Two patients showed mild arthrotic changes. All but two patients were able to return to the same level of preoperative sports participation. None of the four methods studied showed major differences in outcome compared to the other. No growth disturbance could be noted.
Year of publishing
2006
Purpose: To evaluate the cause of recurrent pathologic instability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery and the effectiveness of revision reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon autograft using a 2-incision technique.
Type of study: Retrospective follow-up study.
Methods: Between 1999 and 2001, 31 patients underwent ACL revision reconstruction because of recurrent pathologic instability during sports or daily activities. Twenty-eight patients were reviewed after a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (range, 3.3 to 5.6 years). The mean age at revision surgery was 27 years (range, 18 to 41 years). The average time from primary procedure to revision surgery was 26 months (range, 9 to 45 months). A clinical, functional, and radiographic evaluation was performed. Also magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scanning was performed. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner scales were used. A KT-1000 arthrometer measurement (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) by an experienced physician was made.
Results: Of the failures, 79% had radiographic evidence of malposition of their tunnels. In only 6 cases (21%) was the radiologic anatomy of tunnel placement judged to be correct on both the femoral and tibial side. The MRI or CT showed, in 6 cases, a too-centrally placed femoral tunnel. After revision surgery, the position of tunnels was corrected. A significant improvement of Lachman and pivot-shift phenomenon was observed. In particular, 17 patients had a negative Lachman test, and 11 patients had a grade I Lachman with a firm end point. Preoperatively, the pivot-shift test was positive in all cases, and at last follow-up in 7 patients (25%) a grade 1+ was found. Postoperatively, KT-1000 testing showed a mean manual maximum translation of 8.6 mm (SD, 2.34) for the affected knee; 97% of patients had a maximum manual side-to-side translation <5 mm. At the final postoperative evaluation, 26 patients (93%) graded their knees as normal or nearly normal according to the IKDC score. The mean Lysholm score was 93.6 (SD, 8.77) and the mean Tegner activity score was 6.1 (SD, 1.37). No patient required further revision. Five patients (18%) complained of hypersensitive scars from the reconstructive surgery that made kneeling difficult.
Conclusions: There were satisfactory results after ACL revision surgery using quadriceps tendon and a 2-incision technique at a minimum 3 years' follow-up; 93% of patients returned to sports activities.
Level of evidence: Level IV, case series, no control group.
Year of publishing
2006
Surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is indicated in the ACL-deficient knee with symptomatic instability and multiple ligaments injuries. In the present study, we describe the clinical results of quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft for ACL reconstruction. From 1996 to 1998, the graft has been used in 38 patients. Thirty-four patients with complete final follow-up for 4-7 years were analyzed. The average follow-up time was 62 (48-84) months. Thirty-two patients (94%) achieved good or excellent results by Lysholm knee rating. Twenty-six patients (76%) could return to moderate or strenuous activity after reconstruction. Twenty-eight patients (82%) had ligament laxity of less than 2 mm. Finally; 31 patients (91%) were assessed as normal or nearly normal rating by IKDC guideline. Twenty-five patients (73%) had less than 10 mm difference in thigh girth between their reconstructed and normal limbs. Thirty-two (94%) and 31 (91%) patients could achieve recovery of the extensor and flexor muscle strength in the reconstructed knee to 80% or more of normal knee strength, respectively. A statistically significant difference exists in thigh girth difference, extensor strength ratio, and flexor strength ratio before and after reconstruction. Tunnel expansion with more than 1 mm was identified in 2 (6%) tibial tunnels. Our study revealed satisfactory clinical subjective and objective results at 4-7 years follow-up. Quadriceps tendon autograft has the advantage of being self-available, relatively easier arthroscopic technique, and having a suitable size, making it an acceptable graft choice for ACL reconstruction. There is little quadriceps muscle strength loss after quadriceps harvest. A quadriceps tendon-patellar autograft is an adequate graft choice to ACL reconstruction.
Year of publishing
2006
Purpose: Free tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament have become more prevalent with the desire for reduced morbidity, earlier postoperative rehabilitation, and improved free tendon graft fixation. The central quadriceps tendon autograft is an alternative to bone-patellar tendon-bone and free hamstring autografts. The purpose of this study was to measure the postharvest reduction in quadriceps extensor mechanism strength when a central quadriceps free tendon graft is removed. The strength deficit was compared with that associated with harvesting a central free patellar tendon graft, excluding the effects of harvesting bone blocks.
Type of study: Experimental laboratory study.
Methods: Fourteen knee extensor mechanisms were divided into quadriceps and patellar tendon constructs. Constructs were tested to failure in tension in either the intact state or after removing 10-mm wide central free tendon grafts. Failure strengths of the quadriceps and patellar tendon constructs were compared statistically using paired and unpaired t tests.
Results: The average strength (+/-SD) measured for the native quadriceps tendon was 3,660 +/- 830 N, decreasing to 2,430 +/- 680 N after removing a partial-thickness 10-mm wide central free graft. The average strength measured for the native patellar tendon was 1,920 +/- 330 N, decreasing to 1,460 +/- 740 N after removing a 10-mm wide central free graft.
Conclusions: The tensile strength of the quadriceps tendon is reduced by approximately one third after harvesting a partial-thickness 10-mm wide central free tendon graft. This postharvest strength of the quadriceps tendon is higher than that of the intact patellar tendon.
Clinical relevance: Surgeons can be assured that harvest of a central quadriceps free tendon graft leaves a stronger extensor mechanism than harvest of a patellar tendon graft.
Year of publishing
2005
We describe a technique for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the middle third of the quadriceps tendon without a patellar bone block and absorbable tibial and femoral cross-pin fixation. The central part of the quadriceps tendon is harvested through a 5-cm long anterior skin incision without a patellar bone block. Tibial and femoral tunnels are prepared, the graft is passed up the tunnels, and is fixed both in the femur and the tibia using absorbable cross pins (Rigid Fix; Mitek, Johnson & Johnson, Norwood, MA). In this way, the graft is stabilized near the joint line, providing outlet fixation. In our practice, very good results have been obtained with the use of this technique.
Year of publishing
2004
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon autograft.
Type of study: A case series of patients who had received arthroscopic ACL reconstructions using quadriceps tendon autograft was retrospectively evaluated.
Methods: Sixty-seven ACL reconstructions were evaluated at a mean of 41 months (range, 27 to 49 months). Clinical assessment was made using a modified Lysholm score, documentation of International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the anterior knee pain questionnaire of Shelbourne and Trumper, and by KT-2000 arthrometric analysis. Isokinetic strength testing and radiographic assessments were also performed.
Results: Arthrometric analysis showed that 63 knees (94%) were graded A or B with a median laxity of 2 mm postoperatively. The Lysholm score improved postoperatively from 71 to 90 ( P < or = .05). Extension peak torque of the quadriceps muscle recovered to 82% and 89% of that of the contralateral knee at 180 degrees/second at 1 year and 2 years after surgery, respectively. The patellar position in terms of congruence angle and Insall-Salvati ratio did not show any significant change. Only 4 patients complained of moderate pain on kneeling and 1 patient complained of harvest-site tenderness.
Conclusions: ACL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon autograft showed satisfactory results with reduced donor-site morbidities. The quadriceps tendon can be a reliable source of graft, and is comparable to bone-patellar tendon-bone or hamstring tendon in ACL reconstruction.
Level of evidence: Level IV, Case Series (no, or historical, control group).
Year of publishing
2003
CQFT ACL reconstruction yields a stable, highly functional knee with little associated morbidity. Patient satisfaction has been very high, and objective follow-up data collected thus far is very encouraging.
Year of publishing
1991
Eighty-three patients with ACL reconstructions using the quadriceps patellar tendon graft were evaluated in a 10 year (mean, 5.5 years) follow-up study. A five-part analysis, consisting of physical examination, questionnaire, Genucom analysis, operative note review, and radiographs, was performed. Seventy-six percent were categorized as satisfactory. Ninety-two percent were content with their results, while only 4% were unsatisfied. Ninety-three percent of the patients had no significant pain and 95% had no giving way postreconstruction. Ninety-two percent had no more than a mild functional deficit. Eighty-seven percent and 90% of the patients had no significant Lachman or pivot shift by examination, respectively. Our results showed no increase in failure over time (1 to 10 years), although those operated on during the initial 5 years showed more radiographic degenerative changes. Plotting our results in classification systems of other authors yielded success rates as good as or better than those using our own criteria. An objective means by which to quantify laxity did not reliably correlate with the quantifying of laxity made by physical examination. Only the lack of a formal rehabilitation program greater than 4 months postoperatively and repaired tears of the medial or lateral collateral ligaments proved to be significant risk factors for poor recovery.
Year of publishing
1979
Both primary repair and late substitution of anterior cruciate ligaments can be accomplished by intra-articular methods. This principle is to provide temporary struts that are initially avascular but can later undergo revascularization and metaplasia to form a new ligament. The graft does afford initial support, however. An understanding of anatomic principles, suture placement, freedom of graft from impingement, avoidance of acute angular deviation of the graft, solid static stability, anatomic attachment points, and blood supply, is absolutely essential for success in this field of surgery.
Become a member